On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
> (FUNCTION TROLL
> ((FUNCTION PRINT)
> "Hello World")))
You clearly don't know enough Lisp to even craft a joke properly.
Stick to what you know, that will suite you better.
Regards,
BG
--
Baishampayan Ghose
b.ghose at gmail.com
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
abpil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Santosh Rajan
> wrote:
>
> > Ok I will agree to stop, under one condition, can you please explain the
> > code I have written above?
> >
>
> Well, thank you for the wholesom
Precisely my question on your original post.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
> Are you talking to thin air? You haven't quoted anything???
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>
> > You're confusing open source, free software and free of cost softwa
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
> Ok I will agree to stop, under one condition, can you please explain the
> code I have written above?
>
Well, thank you for the wholesome entertainment you provided.
Well, it was fun while it lasted... Goodbye.
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 a
Ok I will agree to stop, under one condition, can you please explain the
code I have written above?
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Sirtaj Singh Kang wrote:
>
> On 18-May-11, at 6:27 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
>
> (FUNCTION TROLL
>> ((FUNCTION PRINT)
>> "Hello World")))
>>
>>
> Please ju
On 18-May-11, at 6:27 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
(FUNCTION TROLL
((FUNCTION PRINT)
"Hello World")))
Please just stop.
-Taj.
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
(FUNCTION TROLL
((FUNCTION PRINT)
"Hello World")))
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:57 PM, steve wrote:
> Hi Anand,
>
>
> On 05/18/2011 01:03 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote:
>
>> Dude, you seriously have lots of free time on your hands... Here is what
>> I (used to) do when I had time
Hi Anand,
On 05/18/2011 01:03 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote:
Dude, you seriously have lots of free time on your hands... Here is what
I (used to) do when I had time to waste as you do.
Don't feed the troll. I remarked at the fact that this person was deliberately
trolling in another re
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
> As Sartaj Singh Kang, correctly pointed out, there are big bad trainwrecks
> in this world. I think this whole thread must be a cumpulsory reading for
> all students of computer science, all over the world.
Aiming rather too high , aren't
Dude, you seriously have lots of free time on your hands... Here is what
I (used to) do when I had time to waste as you do.
1. Go to http://code.activestate.com/recipes
2. Think up a problem I like to solve on the day and write it up in Python
3. Submit as a Python recipe.
Of course you can do it
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 17:35 +0530, Santosh Rajan wrote:
> Hey, great argument, but I have some riders. Atleast, finally, I think
> we
> are on the same page.
did you not notice that he was pulling your leg?
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
http://lawgon.livejournal.com/
As Sartaj Singh Kang, correctly pointed out, there are big bad trainwrecks
in this world. I think this whole thread must be a cumpulsory reading for
all students of computer science, all over the world. Attleast they need to
now there are big bad trainwrecks still alive in this world.
On Tue, May
On 17-May-11, at 8:32 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
You still haven't seen the case I am making? In which case I shall
admit
defeat and rest my case!
Same. And I apologize to all for my part in this trainwreck.
-Taj.
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPy
You still haven't seen the case I am making? In which case I shall admit
defeat and rest my case!
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Sirtaj Singh Kang wrote:
>
> On 17-May-11, at 8:12 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
>
> great! so let us assume for arguments sake, that whatever you say or pose
>> is
>> ri
On 17-May-11, at 8:12 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
great! so let us assume for arguments sake, that whatever you say or
pose is
right! What answers do you have have for the questions posed below?
Huh? You started this thread, with the intention of modifying the
behaviour of "young immature id
great! so let us assume for arguments sake, that whatever you say or pose is
right! What answers do you have have for the questions posed below?
1. We've established that tech startups are at a disadvantage when based
> outside SV. Why is this so? Specifically, what is different about FOSS-model
>
On 17-May-11, at 5:35 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
[snip]
First of all, let us get one thing out of the way. Success in
software/hardware, no matter where you are, entirely depends on on
how
passionate you are about it. We can't quantify a person's passion
for some
thing. Apple's success, is St
Hey, great argument, but I have some riders. Atleast, finally, I think we
are on the same page.
First of all, let us get one thing out of the way. Success in
software/hardware, no matter where you are, entirely depends on on how
passionate you are about it. We can't quantify a person's passion fo
On 17-May-11, at 6:22 AM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
Ok let me tell you the whole story scientifically.
"The chances of anyone succeeding with an Open Source Project or
Startup
Company is inversely proportional to the square of the distance
between San
Fransisco and the location of this OpenSou
Yes Indeed, you are right.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:44 PM, steve wrote:
> On 05/16/2011 08:22 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
>
>> [...snip...]
>>
>> So my question is, what shit are you talking about based in India? Please,
>> Please Enlighten me?
>>
>>
>>
> /me thinks somebody just discovered a docu
On 05/16/2011 08:22 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
[...snip...]
So my question is, what shit are you talking about based in India? Please,
Please Enlighten me?
/me thinks somebody just discovered a document online describing the art of
trolling and now is aspiring to master it. It is fairly obviou
Agreed! Thanks!
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Gopalakrishnan Subramani <
gopalakrishnan.subram...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Intention of open source/free software is to save the cost, not to generate
> revenue. You can save the cost by using it out-of-box software or you can
> customize it to your
Intention of open source/free software is to save the cost, not to generate
revenue. You can save the cost by using it out-of-box software or you can
customize it to your need so that you will not produce the complete clone of
it.
My strong point is that "Generating money is left to a business/ind
Ya okay, so I agree with whatever you say. So what are you suggesting?
There are a lot of very intelligent people around here, and I can see that
you are one of them, my apologies for being a lesser brain damaged soul.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Balachandran Sivakumar <
benignb...@gmail.co
Hi,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
> And ya, and you still don't have anything to say for yourself!???
>
Well, I normally don't reply when people use strong and foul
language(No, don't ask me to quote it; the whole list knows) without
any valid reason. Now that yo
And ya, and you still don't have anything to say for yourself!???
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Balachandran Sivakumar <
benignb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Santosh Rajan
> wrote:
> > Are you talking to thin air? You haven't quoted anything???
> >
>
>
Hi,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
> Are you talking to thin air? You haven't quoted anything???
>
This is from your disclaimer:
Disclaimer 2. I am not an expert on the subject of free Vs paid.
and that's what Noufal said. Thanks
--
Thank you
Balachandran Sivaku
Are you talking to thin air? You haven't quoted anything???
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> You're confusing open source, free software and free of cost software.
> Also, your approach and choice of words is not one that kindles a
> healthy debate. I don't expect this t
You're confusing open source, free software and free of cost software.
Also, your approach and choice of words is not one that kindles a
healthy debate. I don't expect this thread to lead anywhere useful.
--
~noufal
http://nibrahim.net.in
___
BangPypers
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Venkatraman S wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Santosh Rajan
> wrote:
>
> > Hey, thanks for the good words, and I entirely agree with you. My humble
> > effort here is to try and put a mirror in the face of the entire Indian
> > software Industry. They n
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
> Hey, thanks for the good words, and I entirely agree with you. My humble
> effort here is to try and put a mirror in the face of the entire Indian
> software Industry. They need to look into the mirror and understand what is
> going on.
>
>
Hey, thanks for the good words, and I entirely agree with you. My humble
effort here is to try and put a mirror in the face of the entire Indian
software Industry. They need to look into the mirror and understand what is
going on.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Venkatraman S wrote:
> On Tue, M
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
> > Ridiculous is the right word not hilarious, when you make such
> > generalisation, and spins new theories
> >
>
> Thanks for pointing out how ridiculous what I said was, and I am glad you
> understood what I was talking about. Thanks Agai
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Ramdas S wrote:
> > Ok let me tell you the whole story scientifically.
> >
> > "The chances of anyone succeeding with an Open Source Project or Startup
> > Company is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between
> San
> > Fransisco and the location
> Ok let me tell you the whole story scientifically.
>
> "The chances of anyone succeeding with an Open Source Project or Startup
> Company is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between San
> Fransisco and the location of this OpenSource/Startup Project".
>
> Ya ya, this is hilari
Thanks for your great viewpoint Guru.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 20:22 +0530, Santosh Rajan wrote:
> > Disclaimer 2. I am not an expert on the subject of free Vs paid.
>
> this is obvious - I suggest you stick to things you are an expert on.
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 20:22 +0530, Santosh Rajan wrote:
> Disclaimer 2. I am not an expert on the subject of free Vs paid.
this is obvious - I suggest you stick to things you are an expert on.
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
http://lawgon.livejournal.com/
___
Ok let me tell you the whole story scientifically.
"The chances of anyone succeeding with an Open Source Project or Startup
Company is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between San
Fransisco and the location of this OpenSource/Startup Project".
Ya ya, this is hilarious. But thi
On 17-May-11, at 1:32 AM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
In that case why don't you explain your point in a very "coherent"
manner,
so that we lesser mortals get it. What are you saying with respect
to the
subject of this thread?
When you write something like this:
> So my question is, what shit a
> So my question is, what shit are you talking about based in India? Please,
Please Enlighten me?
I found your first mail rather offensive to begin with, and I find your
response even more so now that you've decided to get personal. Clearly you
consider yourself very l33t if you choose to address p
In that case why don't you explain your point in a very "coherent" manner,
so that we lesser mortals get it. What are you saying with respect to the
subject of this thread?
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Sirtaj Singh Kang wrote:
>
> On 17-May-11, at 12:59 AM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
> [snip]
>
>
On 17-May-11, at 12:59 AM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
[snip]
I think you must read this thread very carefully again. Where did I
say
anything against FOSS? Where did I say software must be charged?
Don't put
words into my mouth just for your arguments sake.
I could certainly quote bits of your o
>
> I've heard all sorts of arguments against FOSS*, but the idea that it is a
> moral/nationalistic imperative to charge for software? This one is new.
> Kudos.
>
I think you must read this thread very carefully again. Where did I say
anything against FOSS? Where did I say software must be charge
On 16-May-11, at 11:51 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
[snip]
As long as people like you don't see the problem, India will always
remain
a second class power in the software world. Do you know that the
entire
software exports of India today is only 5% of the total software
exports of
the world? T
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Sidu Ponnappa wrote:
> You missed
> 4) Found a company to sell services and support around your open source
> product. (MySQL, RedHat, Pentaho)
>
Great! so what percentage of the worldwide revenue of MySql, redhat, pentaho
etc etc you own? Next to Zilch!
> 5)
You missed
4) Found a company to sell services and support around your open source
product. (MySQL, RedHat, Pentaho)
5) Found a company whose commercial offerings (services/products) you
popularise by bouncing off the popularity of your open source (37 Signals,
Thoughtbot)
Does a business model ex
Thanks for your view and reply.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Santosh Rajan
> wrote:
> > I have been reading a few threads on this forum, and even participated in
> > them. However I thought I must write my views on this subject separate
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
> I have been reading a few threads on this forum, and even participated in
> them. However I thought I must write my views on this subject separately.
> Also before I start my tirade, I want to make a couple of disclaimers. Come
> to think of
I have been reading a few threads on this forum, and even participated in
them. However I thought I must write my views on this subject separately.
Also before I start my tirade, I want to make a couple of disclaimers. Come
to think of it, I should make a blog post of this. However since my mind wa
49 matches
Mail list logo
