On Monday 2019-07-29 15:26:51 Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Switching options around did the trick and my ACLs meta data is now
> backed up.
>
> Unfortunately it only applies to files and folders that have been
> modified so my backups are not complete yet.
>
> I'm hoping the next full r
Hi all,
Switching options around did the trick and my ACLs meta data is now
backed up.
Unfortunately it only applies to files and folders that have been
modified so my backups are not complete yet.
I'm hoping the next full run (scheduled for Wednesday) will have them all.
Martin was also r
On Thursday 2019-07-25 09:58:18 Chandler wrote:
> Adam Weremczuk wrote on 7/25/19 04:42:
> > Does it mean it will apply missing attributes in an incremental
> > manner?
>
> You could always minimize your FileSet resource to backup just 1 or a
> few files with ACL's, just for testing. Then once th
Adam Weremczuk wrote on 7/25/19 04:42:
Does it mean it will apply missing attributes in an incremental manner?
You could always minimize your FileSet resource to backup just 1 or a few files
with ACL's, just for testing. Then once those restore fine you can go back to
your full set.
__
On 25/07/19 16:06, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
I saw that someone mentioned using Samba. Bacula does not save and
restore acl across NFS or Samba. To do so you must have a filesystem
that is mounted locally on the File Daemon.
Best regards,
Kern
Hi Kern,
Issue with missing ACLs only a
Hello,
I saw that someone mentioned using Samba. Bacula does not save and
restore acl across NFS or Samba. To do so you must have a filesystem
that is mounted locally on the File Daemon.
Best regards,
Kern
On 7/25/19 12:08 PM, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
On 25/07/19 10:55, Martin Simmons wrot
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:32:07 +0200, Josip Deanovic said:
>
> On Thursday 2019-07-25 13:12:49 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > Only the basic unix permissions are stored in the database, not the acl
> > and xattr info.
>
> I have just checked the database on bacula 7.0.5 and I don't think
> permiss
I think you need to provide the director config file not the client
config file
i.e.
bacula-dir -t /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf
On 25/07/2019 15:28, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
On 25/07/19 12:16, Josip Deanovic wrote:
When you perform some change you can always test the configuration
with the bacu
On 25/07/19 15:40, Josip Deanovic wrote:
If I understand correctly you have run bacula-dir -t with the the client
config excerpt.
You should run bacula-dir -t with the main bacula configuration file.
Yes, bacula-dir -t /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf doesn't complain about
anything so I should be
On Thursday 2019-07-25 15:28:09 Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> On 25/07/19 12:16, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> > When you perform some change you can always test the configuration
> > with the bacula-dir -t command.
>
> I get the following for every single client conf:
>
> bacula-dir -t /etc/bacula/clients/s
On Thursday 2019-07-25 13:12:49 Martin Simmons wrote:
> Only the basic unix permissions are stored in the database, not the acl
> and xattr info.
I have just checked the database on bacula 7.0.5 and I don't think
permissions are stored in the database either.
Also, if you try to do the bextract w
On 25/07/19 12:16, Josip Deanovic wrote:
When you perform some change you can always test the configuration
with the bacula-dir -t command.
I get the following for every single client conf:
bacula-dir -t /etc/bacula/clients/server.conf
25-Jul 15:19 bacula-dir: ERROR TERMINATION at parse_conf.c
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:36:20 +0200, Josip Deanovic said:
>
> Josip DeanovicOn Thursday 2019-07-25 13:18:31 wrote:
> > On Thursday 2019-07-25 12:11:58 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > I don't think this change will cause a full backup -- only changes to
> > > File= and Plugin= lines will do that.
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:03:09 +0200, Josip Deanovic said:
>
> On Thursday 2019-07-25 12:42:13 Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> > On 25/07/19 12:36, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> > > Just checked the documentation.
> > > @Martin, I think you are right.
> > >
> > >
> > > https://www.bacula.org/5.2.x-manuals
On Thursday 2019-07-25 12:42:13 Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> On 25/07/19 12:36, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> > Just checked the documentation.
> > @Martin, I think you are right.
> >
> >
> > https://www.bacula.org/5.2.x-manuals/en/main/main/Configuring_Director
> > .html#SECTION00147
> >
>
On 25/07/19 12:39, Josip Deanovic wrote:
About the deletion of old jobs...
What kind of storage type are using? Are you using real tapes or
files on disk?
See my "[Bacula-users] deleting data written to volume" post from about
an hour ago.
___
Bacu
On 25/07/19 12:36, Josip Deanovic wrote:
Just checked the documentation.
@Martin, I think you are right.
https://www.bacula.org/5.2.x-manuals/en/main/main/Configuring_Director.html#SECTION00147
"Any change to the list of the included files will cause Bacula to
automatically cr
On Thursday 2019-07-25 12:31:42 Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> On 25/07/19 12:18, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> > On Thursday 2019-07-25 12:11:58 Martin Simmons wrote:
> >> I don't think this change will cause a full backup -- only changes to
> >> File= and Plugin= lines will do that.
> >
> > Curious to hear i
Josip DeanovicOn Thursday 2019-07-25 13:18:31 wrote:
> On Thursday 2019-07-25 12:11:58 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > I don't think this change will cause a full backup -- only changes to
> > File= and Plugin= lines will do that.
>
> Curious to hear if this is correct. :-)
Just checked the documentat
On 25/07/19 12:18, Josip Deanovic wrote:
On Thursday 2019-07-25 12:11:58 Martin Simmons wrote:
I don't think this change will cause a full backup -- only changes to
File= and Plugin= lines will do that.
Curious to hear if this is correct. :-)
Thanks Josip.
I'm leaning towards agreeing with y
On Thursday 2019-07-25 12:11:58 Martin Simmons wrote:
> I don't think this change will cause a full backup -- only changes to
> File= and Plugin= lines will do that.
Curious to hear if this is correct. :-)
--
Josip Deanovic
___
Bacula-users mailing l
On Thursday 2019-07-25 11:08:53 Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> On 25/07/19 10:55, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > Yes, the FileSet may be the problem -- try reordering the Options
> > clauses so that the "default" Options clause containing xattrsupport
> > etc is the last one.
> >
> > The manual says: "However
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:08:53 +0100, Adam Weremczuk said:
>
> On 25/07/19 10:55, Martin Simmons wrote:
>
> > Yes, the FileSet may be the problem -- try reordering the Options clauses so
> > that the "default" Options clause containing xattrsupport etc is the last
> > one.
> >
> > The manual
On 25/07/19 11:44, Josip Deanovic wrote:
Additionally, the first one seems to be linked with Eset antivirus
library.
Well spotted :)
ESET Node32 was installed much later and it's just a silly experiment.
I wouldn't thought it could affect operations of Bacula client.
The suspicion is my config
On Thursday 2019-07-25 10:15:46 Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> On 25/07/19 03:52, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> > Can you also check ldd bacula-fd on both clients (working and not
> > working)?
> >
> > I cannot check now if samba is using libacl or its own implementation.
>
> client with working ACL backup/re
On 25/07/19 10:55, Martin Simmons wrote:
Yes, the FileSet may be the problem -- try reordering the Options clauses so
that the "default" Options clause containing xattrsupport etc is the last one.
The manual says: "However, one additional point is that in the case that no
match was found, Bacul
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 10:19:21 +0100, Adam Weremczuk said:
>
> On 24/07/19 16:49, Martin Simmons wrote:
>
> > What happens if you take a backup from the broken client and restore it on
> > the
> > working client? And vice versa?
> Restore from the broken client to a working one misses ACLs.
On 24/07/19 16:49, Martin Simmons wrote:
What happens if you take a backup from the broken client and restore it on the
working client? And vice versa?
Restore from the broken client to a working one misses ACLs.
Restore from working client to broken shows them correctly.
Could it be somethin
On 25/07/19 03:52, Josip Deanovic wrote:
Can you also check ldd bacula-fd on both clients (working and not
working)?
I cannot check now if samba is using libacl or its own implementation.
client with working ACL backup/restore:
ldd /usr/sbin/bacula-fd
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fffb519b0
On Wednesday 2019-07-24 16:39:02 Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> On 24/07/19 16:33, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> > On 24/07/19 16:24, Martin Simmons wrote:
> >> Have you checked if acl and xattr support is compiled into the
> >> bacula-fd?
> >>
> >> objdump -T ...path..to../bacula-fd | egrep 'acl|xattr'
> >>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:39:02 +0100, Adam Weremczuk said:
>
> On 24/07/19 16:33, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
>
> > On 24/07/19 16:24, Martin Simmons wrote:
> >
> >> Have you checked if acl and xattr support is compiled into the
> >> bacula-fd?
> >>
> >> objdump -T ...path..to../bacula-fd | egrep
On 24/07/19 16:33, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
On 24/07/19 16:24, Martin Simmons wrote:
Have you checked if acl and xattr support is compiled into the
bacula-fd?
objdump -T ...path..to../bacula-fd | egrep 'acl|xattr'
__Martin
objdump -T /usr/sbin/bacula-fd | egrep 'acl|xattr'
On 24/07/19 16:24, Martin Simmons wrote:
Have you checked if acl and xattr support is compiled into the bacula-fd?
objdump -T ...path..to../bacula-fd | egrep 'acl|xattr'
__Martin
objdump -T /usr/sbin/bacula-fd | egrep 'acl|xattr'
DF *UND* ACL_1.0 a
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:54:49 +0100, Adam Weremczuk said:
>
> On 23/07/19 19:16, Josip Deanovic wrote:
>
> > Have you checked both file systems for the ACL support?
> > ACL support might be disabled.
> The client in question (fd) also happens to be Bacula director and sd.
> An yes, it does s
On 23/07/19 19:16, Josip Deanovic wrote:
Have you checked both file systems for the ACL support?
ACL support might be disabled.
The client in question (fd) also happens to be Bacula director and sd.
An yes, it does support ACL:
cat /etc/mtab | grep acl | grep var
/dev/mapper/vg0-var /var ext4
On Tuesday 2019-07-23 16:33:38 Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> Strangely both options were already in client's config file, just failed
> to be executed for some reason:
>
> FileSet {
>Name = server_fileset
>Include {
> Options {
>signature = SHA1
>##sparse = yes
>xatt
Strangely both options were already in client's config file, just failed
to be executed for some reason:
FileSet {
Name = server_fileset
Include {
Options {
signature = SHA1
##sparse = yes
xattrsupport = yes
aclsupport = yes
noatime = yes
checkfilechan
Hi all,
With Bacula 5.2.6 (I know it's old) is it possible to preserve, e.g:
Check the FileSet reference, option aclsupport=yes and/or xattrsupport=yes,
https://www.bacula.org/5.2.x-manuals/en/main/main/Configuring_Director.html#SECTION00147
--
Chandler / Systems Administrator
38 matches
Mail list logo
