On Thursday 2019-07-25 10:15:46 Adam Weremczuk wrote: > On 25/07/19 03:52, Josip Deanovic wrote: > > Can you also check ldd bacula-fd on both clients (working and not > > working)? > > > > I cannot check now if samba is using libacl or its own implementation. > > client with working ACL backup/restore: [...]
> client with broken ACL backup/restore: [...] > Missing ACLs in restores are not specific to samba. > I've tried it for other folders and the behavior was the same (i.e. > missing ACLs when restored). That looks ok to me. Both clients have everything they need and there are no missing libraries. Additionally, the first one seems to be linked with Eset antivirus library. -- Josip Deanovic _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
