On Thursday 2019-07-25 12:31:42 Adam Weremczuk wrote: > On 25/07/19 12:18, Josip Deanovic wrote: > > On Thursday 2019-07-25 12:11:58 Martin Simmons wrote: > >> I don't think this change will cause a full backup -- only changes to > >> File= and Plugin= lines will do that. > > > > Curious to hear if this is correct. :-) > > Thanks Josip. > I'm leaning towards agreeing with you on this. > If ACLs were not part of the last full backup and I'm going to change > that then it would make sense for a full backup to be forced. > That's why I'd like to delete the previous full first (which run last > night). > See my other post from today. > That also should force next full and you might never find out if you > were right :) > I simply don't have space on tape to squeeze 2 full ones. > Deletion should be easier than fiddling with schedules and juggling > tapes.
No, I think Martin was right but please to confirm when you run it. This is the excerpt from the documentation: "Any change to the list of the included files will cause Bacula to automatically create a new FileSet (defined by the name and an MD5 checksum of the Include/Exclude contents). Each time a new FileSet is created, Bacula will ensure that the next backup is always a Full save." About the deletion of old jobs... What kind of storage type are using? Are you using real tapes or files on disk? -- Josip Deanovic _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
