On Wednesday 2019-07-24 16:39:02 Adam Weremczuk wrote: > On 24/07/19 16:33, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > > On 24/07/19 16:24, Martin Simmons wrote: > >> Have you checked if acl and xattr support is compiled into the > >> bacula-fd? > >> > >> objdump -T ...path..to../bacula-fd | egrep 'acl|xattr' > >> > >> __Martin > > > > objdump -T /usr/sbin/bacula-fd | egrep 'acl|xattr' > > 0000000000000000 DF *UND* 0000000000000000 ACL_1.0 acl_valid > > 0000000000000000 DF *UND* 0000000000000000 ACL_1.0 > > acl_get_file 0000000000000000 DF *UND* 0000000000000000 > > GLIBC_2.3 lgetxattr 0000000000000000 DF *UND* > > 0000000000000000 ACL_1.0 acl_free 0000000000000000 DF *UND* > > 0000000000000000 ACL_1.0 acl_from_text 0000000000000000 DF > > *UND* 0000000000000000 ACL_1.0 > > acl_get_tag_type > > 0000000000000000 DF *UND* 0000000000000000 ACL_1.0 > > acl_get_entry 0000000000000000 DF *UND* 0000000000000000 > > GLIBC_2.3 lsetxattr 0000000000000000 DF *UND* > > 0000000000000000 ACL_1.0 acl_set_file 0000000000000000 DF > > *UND* 0000000000000000 ACL_1.0 acl_to_text 0000000000000000 > > DF *UND* 0000000000000000 GLIBC_2.3 llistxattr > > 0000000000000000 DF *UND* 0000000000000000 ACL_1.0 > > acl_delete_def_file > > I'm getting identical output on the other client ALC backups worked on.
Can you also check ldd bacula-fd on both clients (working and not working)? I cannot check now if samba is using libacl or its own implementation. -- Josip Deanovic _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
