Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Director 13.0.4 service fails— PostgreSQL Connection Failure

Did you upgrade any other software on the Director or PostgreSQL servers at the same time? Did you edit this output? Two things seem strange to me: 1) The "Could not open Catalog" error has database "bacula" but the "Unable to connect" error has Database=baculadb. 2) The user name in the Postgr

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users schrieb am 16.06.25 um 16:32: On 6/15/25 2:19 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: As this surprisingly looked more like a changer, despite the error code=70, I changed the changer path in bacula-sd.conf to / dev//sg8 Then I ran a backup (catalogue

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Udo Kaune schrieb am 15.06.25 um 12:21: Am 15.06.25 um 10:19 schrieb Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users: Udo Kaune schrieb am 13.06.25 um 23:47: Hi Thorsten, Did you reboot the box recently and did by any chance your devices get reordered? What does lsscsi -g show and does that correspo

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

On 6/15/25 2:19 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: As this surprisingly looked more like a changer, despite the error code=70, I changed the changer path in bacula-sd.conf to / dev//sg8 Then I ran a backup (catalogue to make it quick): *And to my surprise - the backup worked agai

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users schrieb am 13.06.25 um 19:48: On 6/12/25 10:32 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: Hi Bill thank you for your as always helpful insights. You are more than welcome, Thorsten. :) I was not aware of the conflict between the libraries and baculas

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users schrieb am 13.06.25 um 19:48: On 6/12/25 10:32 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: Hi Bill thank you for your as always helpful insights. You are more than welcome, Thorsten. :) I was not aware of the conflict between the libraries and baculas

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Udo Kaune schrieb am 13.06.25 um 23:47: Hi Thorsten, Did you reboot the box recently and did by any chance your devices get reordered? What does lsscsi -g show and does that correspond to your bacula-sd.conf entries? Best regards, Udo Hi Udo, yes, I regularily reboot the system for main

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users schrieb am 13.06.25 um 19:48: On 6/12/25 10:32 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: Hi Bill thank you for your as always helpful insights. You are more than welcome, Thorsten. :) I was not aware of the conflict between the libraries and baculas

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Hi Thorsten, Did you reboot the box recently and did by any chance your devices get reordered? What does lsscsi -g show and does that correspond to your bacula-sd.conf entries? Best regards, Udo smime.p7s Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

On 6/12/25 10:32 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: Hi Bill thank you for your as always helpful insights. You are more than welcome, Thorsten. :) I was not aware of the conflict between the libraries and baculas autoclean feature. Immediately I turned the one of the lib off

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users schrieb am 12.06.25 um 18:03: On 6/12/25 1:43 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: Hi I am using a Neo 24 Tape library with an LTO-9 drive. The old one (Tandberg) broke recently and was replaced with a different one. Then the backups with Bacula work

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

On 6/12/25 1:43 AM, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: Hi I am using a Neo 24 Tape library with an LTO-9 drive. The old one (Tandberg) broke recently and was replaced with a different one. Then the backups with Bacula worked fine for some time. Now I get those errors (again): 12-Jun

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula or Drive problem?

On 12/6/25 17:43, Dr. Thorsten Brandau via Bacula-users wrote: Hi I am using a Neo 24 Tape library with an LTO-9 drive. The old one (Tandberg) broke recently and was replaced with a different one. Then the backups with Bacula worked fine for some time. Now I get those errors (again): 12-Jun

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 13.0.4 Upgrade with Existing PostgreSQL Database - Version Error

Hello Martin, Thank you for pointing that out. It was that older version script. I ran the updated version script and I was able to upgrade postgresql db catagories. Sincerely, Saiful On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 4:28 PM Martin Simmons wrote: > Which version of bacula-director-pgsql do you have on

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-web restore assistant : serching by windows root partition letters

users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-web restore assistant : serching by windows root partition letters [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de ganius...@gmail.com. Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] On Fri, 23 May 2025 at

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-web restore assistant : serching by windows root partition letters

On Fri, 23 May 2025 at 15:01, Lionel PLASSE wrote: > >.bvfs_lsdirs jobid=12345 path=D:/ > >.bvfs_lsfiles jobid=12345 path=D:/ > > Unfortunately those two commands don't return any results (with a good jobid) > nor with path=D:/mydir Hello Lionel, For empty results from the command with path=D:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-web restore assistant : serching by windows root partition letters

dir -Message d'origine- De : Marcin Haba Envoyé : jeudi 22 mai 2025 20:27 À : Lionel PLASSE Cc : bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-web restore assistant : serching by windows root partition letters [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de ganius

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-web restore assistant : serching by windows root partition letters

On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 13:43, Lionel PLASSE wrote: > > Hello, > > I notice, with my bacula-web restoration assistant, for the Windows file > group, that when I enter the prefix of the Windows partition alone, > it does not list the contents of D:/ for example, I have to specify D:/my_dir. > Befor

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-fd Instances Timing Out on `status client`, despite Running Jobs

Interesting.  I remember being confused about which `Maximum Concurrent Jobs` to use (the `bacula-fd.conf` vs the director's config), but your explanation makes a lot of sense.  I hadn't realized/considered the implications of having it set too low in the FD's config. I'll test it and if the p

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-fd Instances Timing Out on `status client`, despite Running Jobs

On 5/20/25 3:20 PM, Lloyd Brown wrote: Hi all, I'm running into an issue with some bacula-fd instances and hoping someone can point me in the right direction. In short: I have bacula-fd instances that are clearly running jobs (confirmed via strace), but they often time out when I run status c

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 13.0.4 Upgrade with Existing PostgreSQL Database - Version Error

Which version of bacula-director-pgsql do you have on the PostgreSQL server? You need 13.0.4. This line in your output shows that /usr/share/bacula-director/update_postgresql_tables is from an older version (probably 9.x.y): > This script can only update an existing version 12-15 database to vers

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 13.0.4 Upgrade with Existing PostgreSQL Database - Version Error

Hi Martin, I tried to run it from the postgresql database. But I got the following error: sudo -u postgres /usr/share/bacula-director/update_postgresql_tables -U baculadev -d baculadev -h localhost This script will update a Bacula PostgreSQL database from version 12-15 to 16 Depending on the c

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 13.0.4 Upgrade with Existing PostgreSQL Database - Version Error

Hi Saiful, You can probably run it from the PostgreSQL server. You will have to look at the update_bacula_tables and update_postgresql_tables scripts installed on the PostgreSQL server to ensure that the db_name variable is set to bacula_dev. To be safe, make a backup of the bacula_prod database

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 13.0.4 Upgrade with Existing PostgreSQL Database - Version Error

Hi Martin, Thanks for your reply. Could you please advise on the correct way to upgrade the bacula_dev database schema in this situation? Specifically, What is the exact command I should use with update_bacula_tables to target the bacula_dev database? I installed the bacula-director package in m

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 13.0.4 Upgrade with Existing PostgreSQL Database - Version Error

Yes, you need to run update_bacula_tables as root. Any arguments will be passed to psql for the password etc (but not the database name). update_bacula_tables just invokes update_postgresql_tables and you can check the db_name variable in that script to see which database it will update. If you

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Fedora/SELinux

Hi Rob, I've just followed you suggestion to suspend SELinux and that helped a lot: *sudo setenforce 0* # set to 'permissive', or 'selinux-disabled' mode Bacula-fd service is now working fine and I've managed to get regular backups from the new server. I'm busy installing all th

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Fedora/SELinux

Ismael, That is a strange problem. I would guess that the bacula packages installed in fedora are not 'selinux aware' and aren't setting the correct contexts for you. I am running bacula 13.0.3 and 15.0.2 on multiple rocky linux 9.x based machines. Rocky linux is based on RHEL (as I am sure you k

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Fedora/SELinux

Because you ran a bacula service as root, and to help you correct issues caused by that: Here is one of my /opt/bacula/working folders, to help you find your folder on fedora. You can troubleshoot permissions issues with the files in the working directory this way. [root@td-bacula ~]# ls -lah /op

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

Mandi! Sven Hartge In chel di` si favelave... > The "live" backports repository is disabled and archived for any release > that is moved to the LTS stage, so no wonder you could not find anything > on there. Thanks for the info. Anyway, for a sake of completeness, at the end i've simply put

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

On 26.04.25 09:58, Marco Gaiarin wrote: Mandi! Sven Hartge In chel di` si favelave... There was a Debian-Backports package for Buster for 9.6.7, availabe still via https://snapshot.debian.org/package/bacula/9.6.7-3~bpo10%2B1/#bacula-sd_9.6.7-3:7e:bpo10:2b:1 That will install cleanly without

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

Mandi! Martin Simmons In chel di` si favelave... > In general, you need the versions of the director and storage to be the same. > Anything else is untested. OK. Because of 'catalog datbase format remains unchanged' i hoped that DIR<->SD compatibility could/would be a 'major version only' thing

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

Mandi! Sven Hartge In chel di` si favelave... > There was a Debian-Backports package for Buster for 9.6.7, availabe still via > https://snapshot.debian.org/package/bacula/9.6.7-3~bpo10%2B1/#bacula-sd_9.6.7-3:7e:bpo10:2b:1 > That will install cleanly without the need for manual compilation. Uh!

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

On 25.04.25 20:39, Martin Simmons wrote: I think your simplest option is to build Bacula 9.6.7 yourself on the buster machines so you can upgrade all machines to that version before doing any OS upgrades. There was a Debian-Backports package for Buster for 9.6.7, availabe still via https://s

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.4 and 9.6 compatibility...

The catalog compatibility just means you don't need to update the catalog when you upgrade the director. That doesn't help with compatibility between the director and storage daemons, which is mainly affected by the communication between them. In general, you need the versions of the director and

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula + Zimbra: Run Before Backup

On 3/20/25 3:56 AM, Bruno Bartels (Intero Technologies) wrote: Hi Bill, thank you very much for your detailed answer. Reading the details from your answer, everythings seems convincingly. I have discussed the issue yesterday with an other admin/devops. I think I've stressed out the wrong poin

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula + Zimbra: Run Before Backup

t the whole backup because it generates Load on the Zimbra Server and users are working with Zimbra). Thank you very much! Bruno -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bill An: bacula-users Datum: Donnerstag, 20. März 2025 00:41 CET Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula + Zimbra: Run Before Backup On

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula + Zimbra: Run Before Backup

On 3/19/25 5:08 AM, Bruno Bartels \(Intero Technologies\) via Bacula-users wrote: Hi all, I am fiddeling with a problem. I am trying to set things up like mentioned here: https://www.bacula.lat/zimbra-network-edition-backup-with-bacula/?lang=en

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

I've been thinking and the conclusion I reached is that it's generally understandable that bacula doesn't fail backup or copy jobs that have failed part uploads. It's also understandable that bacula wouldn't 'fail' an admin job if the admin job ran into trouble in its script. After all, how should

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

Bill, Awesome. I'll check it out tomorrow. Regards, Robert Gerber 402-237-8692 r...@craeon.net On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:38 PM Bill Arlofski wrote: > @Rob Gerber, all... > > I have just pushed a new feature which will notify on Cloud jobs with > cloud part transfer errors. > > If there are cl

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

@Rob Gerber, all... I have just pushed a new feature which will notify on Cloud jobs with cloud part transfer errors. If there are cloud jobs that have part transfer errors, a new banner line will be at the top of the report above the job table telling you how many jobs had cloud transfer erro

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

This is the script I use in a run after clause in the cloud backup job. This does all cloud volumes without bothering to check what went and what didn't. Most of the time it does nothing, just resending parts when there is an upload error. #!/bin/bash #upload to cloud sleep 10 #wait 10secs echo "c

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

replies inline below. A lot of things can affect reliability, and who knows, maybe there are > intermittent issues during backup jobs and cloud > volume part uploads which are out of your control causing some parts to > fail to be uploaded during the backup job itself, but > those issues do not

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

I had exactly that problem with S3/Backblaze. I would sometimes get a "no tomes available" error message. I run a script after to upload the part files for all volumes all over again. The driver seems smart enough to not upload part files that are already there. -Chris- On Fri, 21 Feb 2025, 02:21

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 at 18:01, Rob Gerber wrote: >> What error message did you experience with Amazon driver? > > I saw errors like this: > > 22-Feb 10:28 td-bacula-sd JobId 97: Error: B2-TGU-Inc-0048/part.1 > state=error retry=10/10 size=263 B duration=56s > msg=/opt/bacula/plugins/aws_clo

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

Replies inline below. Regards, Robert Gerber 402-237-8692 r...@craeon.net On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 8:40 PM Marcin Haba wrote: > On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 03:21, Rob Gerber wrote: > > I'm using the s3 driver instead of the amazon driver. I read that the > new amazon driver is much better than the s

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

On 2/20/25 7:40 PM, Marcin Haba wrote: Hello Rob, What error message did you experience with Amazon driver? For Amazon driver and non-AWS S3 cloud storage in the Cloud configuration resource you need to define the BlobEndpoint directive. Otherwise it will not work. @Rob right on schedule, Marc

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

On 2/20/25 7:19 PM, Rob Gerber wrote: > Hello, [...snip...] Some parts are failing to upload. I verified with ls that the parts in question still remain on disk (I have set cloud cache to truncate on upload, so only part1 and parts that haven't uploaded should remain). In bconsole I ran 'clou

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 03:21, Rob Gerber wrote: > I'm using the s3 driver instead of the amazon driver. I read that the new > amazon driver is much better than the s3 driver, but in my testing the amazon > driver didn't seem to want to connect to a non-aws server. Hello Rob, What error message

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula - Backup's of LUKS Fully encrypted Disks

backups onto the local machine for me to move to a remote backup location. Regards, Jonathan Aquilina From: Udo Kaune Sent: 27 January 2025 16:47 To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula - Backup's of LUKS Fully encrypted Disks Am 25.01.25 um 07:16 schrieb Jon

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula - Backup's of LUKS Fully encrypted Disks

Am 25.01.25 um 07:16 schrieb Jonathan Aquilina via Bacula-users: Good Morning, Is it possible to use bacula to backup fully encrypted disks that are encrypted with LUKS? Regards, Jonathan Aquilina It's a bit unclear, what you want to accomplish. If you LUKS drive is mounted, the data on

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Backup Problem

On 1/15/25 7:25 AM, Gina Costa wrote: Hi, I´m using Bacula 9.6.5, and I ran a backup in a WIndows Client. The client´s status is OK, the job ran wtihout any error (as shown in job´s log), but when I try to do a recover  the backup is empty. I don´t understand what is happening? I also attac

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Backup Problem

OK Gina, I saw your screenshot. Based on that I saw thay there are no file records for the backup in question. The file records were probably purged from the database because of the file retention period specified. The actual files on the volume where they are stored should still be able to restore

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Backup Problem

Hello Gina, Sorry, your screenshot did not come through. I think the mailing list restricts large files. Maybe try uploading somewhere else and post the link here? Robert Gerber 402-237-8692 r...@craeon.net On Wed, Jan 15, 2025, 8:26 AM Gina Costa wrote: > Hi, > > I´m using Bacula 9.6.5, and I

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-Web won't play nice.

Testing your setup may help too https://www.bacula-web.org/docs/install/test Best, Davide On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 13:32 D. wrote: > > Daniel, > > Maybe try installing the "php-pdo" package...??? > > # dnf install php-pdo > > > If it is already installed, maybe you have a SELinux problem. You

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-Web won't play nice.

Daniel, Maybe try installing the "php-pdo" package...??? # dnf install php-pdo If it is already installed, maybe you have a SELinux problem. You can temporarily disable SELinux with the command: # setenforce permissive If it works after disabling SEL, you probably need to turn on the SE

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula: Backup Fatal Error of Client:pi-fd Fileset:docs Incremental

Hello Ana Thanks for asking. Yes, I did what you suggested and now everything is fine. Best -Chris- > On 28 Nov 2024, at 11:06, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: > > Hello Chris, > > Have you fixed this issue? > > By deleting the volume from the Catalog (bconsole delete volume command), > dele

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-Web won't play nice.

Hi Daniel, You need to update the pg_hba.conf on the postgres server side. Here's below an extract of one of my postgreSQL server pg_hba.conf # TYPE DATABASEUSERADDRESS METHOD ... hostbacula bacula 192.168.1.0/24 md5 ... You mu

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-Web won't play nice.

Hi Daniel, Am 27.11.2024 um 21:43 schrieb White, Daniel E. (GSFC-764.0)[AEGIS] via Bacula-users: ... about bacula-web, which I have not looked at for a *very* long time. But: 200~Bacula-Web logo Bacula-Web Oops, it looks like something went wrong somehow :( Database error SQLSTATE[0800

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula install pages are not working

Thanks Amo I had the install steps documenred for myself, so i am good, i try sending them a mail cheers On 2024-11-25 23:13, Arno Lehmann via Bacula-users wrote: Hi, Am 25.11.2024 um 15:10 schrieb Mehrdad Ravanbod: Hi guys bacula install pages for the community edition(actualy the whole

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula install pages are not working

Hi, Am 25.11.2024 um 15:10 schrieb Mehrdad Ravanbod: Hi guys bacula install pages for the community edition(actualy the whole site) at Bacula.lat bacula.lat is the turf of a company in Brazil (mostly) and the operators are not very active here. I would suggest reaching out via mail: cont.

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-15.x packages for Fedora (workstation)

Am 15.10.24 um 15:06 schrieb Dragan Milivojević: RH is a bit conservative, especially when it comes to server software that is not that widely used. In this case it was a good decision since the latest Bacula breaks the backups if you use accurate mode with pino5 settings. Anyway you can use copr

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-15.x packages for Fedora (workstation)

RH is a bit conservative, especially when it comes to server software that is not that widely used. In this case it was a good decision since the latest Bacula breaks the backups if you use accurate mode with pino5 settings. Anyway you can use copr repositories for the latest version: copr.fedorain

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 - Windows Clients name-fd.trace File Grows Extremely Fast

Hello, thanks for the report, I have uploaded a new version of the binary on bacula.org without the trace problem. It's called 15.0.2-3. The previous one is no longer on the main page. Best Regards, Eric On 9/21/24 00:15, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi Derek, Am 20.09.2024 um 20:37 schrieb Derek Babl

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 - Windows Clients name-fd.trace File Grows Extremely Fast

Hi Derek, Am 20.09.2024 um 20:37 schrieb Derek Bable: Hi All, I am having a strange issue regarding Bacula 15.0.2 on Windows Clients. Clients were installed using the Bacula 15.0.2 Binaries from bacula.org. We noticed that the C:\Program Files\Bacula\working\host-fd.trace file grows extreme

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula setup hangs, need help debugging

On 9/11/24 1:55 AM, Simon Flutura wrote: Hi, I inherited a bacula setup, backing several machines up on tape. Sadly the setup hangs, no network/cpu/io activity while jobs are running forever. We are running Bacula   11.0.6. Do you have any clue where to start in debugging the setup? Best,

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula rescue cdrom source code

On Sat, Aug 24, 2024, at 5:03 AM, Josip Deanovic via Bacula-users wrote: > On 2024-08-24 01:32, Jose Alberto wrote: >> rear with bacula? work??? Test >> >> https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/rear > > Hello, > > Yes, it works. > I am using it for several years now, with Centos 6, Centos

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula rescue cdrom source code

On 2024-08-24 01:32, Jose Alberto wrote: rear with bacula? work??? Test https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/rear Hello, Yes, it works. I am using it for several years now, with Centos 6, Centos 7, Centos 8, Debian 10, Debian 11 and Debian 12. In my case, bootable rear image is betwe

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula rescue cdrom source code

rear with bacula? work??? Test https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/rear On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 1:37 PM Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users < bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On 8/1/24 7:31 AM, William Rice wrote: > > > > Hello I'm trying to locate the bacula-rescue cdrom sour

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula rescue cdrom source code

Another thing of note is the Relax and Recover (rear) project. It's capable of building full system images using tar, or just recreating the partitions on the host system prior to you doing a full fileset restore using Bacula. relax-and-recover.org Robert Gerber 402-237-8692 r...@craeon.net On

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula rescue cdrom source code

On 8/1/24 13:35, Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users wrote: On 8/1/24 7:31 AM, William Rice wrote: > Hello I'm trying to locate the bacula-rescue cdrom source code so I can make a Bare Metal Recovery cdrom for bacula-9.0.8 Any help would be greatly appreciated! For what it's worth: What I do

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

Thank you, Marcin. That link (https://baculum.app/doc/brief/installation.html#manual-installation) led me to the newest Baculum. BTW, I do use your Bacularis and like it. It is just that I want both especially since I am still fairly new to Bacula and I see no harm in having both. Thank

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 14:16, Mehrdad Ravanbod wrote: > Hi > > I have recently installed Bacula and Bacularis, i did not install v. 15 > simply because it is too new, but installing bacularis I have seen no > mention of incompatibilities with verion 15, and I have not seen it > mentioned anywhere

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

Hi I have recently installed Bacula and Bacularis, i did not install v. 15 simply because it is too new, but installing bacularis I have seen no mention of incompatibilities with verion 15, and I have not seen it mentioned anywhere, and I am pretty sure Marcin would have mentioned it, since h

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 03:29, Rob Gerber wrote: > > I hope someone else on this list can shed some light on this. Perhaps > Marcin? > Hello Everybody, Thanks, Rob. Yes, I will try to explain it. The latest Baculum release is 15.0.2 released as usual together with Bacula 15.0.2. It can be inst

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

Ah, I see you are correct. Sorry for the incorrect information. I read the bacula release notes for 15.0.2 and they mentioned changes to baculum. That's pretty confusing, given that the latest version of baculum hosted in the baculum repo appears to be 11.x. Things I found while looking for this:l

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

I do have a key and there is no Baculum to be found there; just the Bacula repositories. The only place I have found Baculum is here and the last version is 11.0.6: https://www.bacula.org/downloads/baculum/ A newer version of Baculum is nowhere to be found. :( --- On 8/18/2024 12:58 PM, Ro

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

Dirk, Baculum packages should be available from this official bacula repository. To get access together repository you must sign up with your name and email at the below link. They will provide a repo link with a custom alphanumeric component (your secret repo key). They should send you an email w

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

Can someone link me to the newest Baculum repository? I cannot find it. I can only find the old Baculum 11.0 repository. Please and thanks. --- On 8/18/2024 11:01 AM, Rob Gerber wrote: Enrico, I don't know if baculum 11 is compatible with bacula 15.0.2. I suspect not. There is a newer

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

Enrico, I don't know if baculum 11 is compatible with bacula 15.0.2. I suspect not. There is a newer version of baculum. It is available from the community repository, same as the other bacula project binaries. You could also look into bacularis, which is a friendly fork of baculum by one of the

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

Dear Rob, thanks for your reply. I'll try Bacularis because it seems to be under development; it has got a repository for RPM and DEB and is well documented. Best Regards -Willy- Il giorno dom 18 ago 2024 alle ore 20:02 Rob Gerber ha scritto: > Enrico, > > I don't know if baculum 11 is compat

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

The solution I came up with is to add a new storage resource pointing to the same storage device just for remote client backup. Thus one has the 'FDStorageAddress =' directive. I removed this directive from the storages used for local backup and copy jobs. This appears to have fixed it. Local backu

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

My post got bounced because of the attachment. It may get passed through eventually but here again without. -Chris On Sat, 10 Aug 2024, 16:42 Chris Wilkinson, wrote: > I thought I had this fixed but not quite. Backups have gone back to the > slow speed. The culprit is the "FDStorageAddress = FQ

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

The way I have it set up is storage=“sd backup storage” defined in the backup jobs, undefined in the backup pools (job overrides) storage=“sd copy/migrate storage” undefined in the copy/migrate jobs, defined in the copy/migrate pools (pool overrides always) Best -Chris- > On 9 Aug 2024, at

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

On 8/9/24 4:51 AM, Chris Wilkinson wrote: >> Just an aside - I realised whilst editing the jobs that the storage=“sd used for backup jobs" should be specified in the Job resource, it’s not necessary (or desirable) to specify the storage in the Pool as well since the job overrides the pool. J

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

Update The problem is resolved now I think. I reinstalled Postgres, db, tables etc. and the result was no better. I then stood up a new SD/NAS and adjusted the jobs to backup to this. The result is backups @~30MB/s, where it was previously. There is something gone wrong with the prior NAS that

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

On 08/08/2024 04:27, Rob Gerber wrote: I am not sure, but having done 'cat bacula.sql |more' I believe there Please don't promulgate useless uses of "cat". Either "more bacula.sql" or "less bacula.sql". Cheers, GaryB-)

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

The results after dropping and reinstating the db + reloading the prior sql dump show no improvement at all, in fact a bit slower. ☹ They are around 1MB/s. I did a second test where the data is on the Pi SD card. This was also ~1MB/s so that result seems to rule out the HDD as source of the bottle

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

No worries, I've cleared out the db, run the postgres db scripts and imported the sql dump. It's up and running again and all the jobs etc. appear intact. Doing some testing so will report results back. -Chris On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, 20:58 Bill Arlofski, wrote: > On 8/7/24 1:11 PM, Chris Wilkinson

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

On 8/7/24 1:11 PM, Chris Wilkinson wrote: And then import the saved sql dump which drops all the tables again and creates/fills them? -Chris Hello Chris! My bad! I have been using a custom script I wrote years ago to do my catalog backups. It uses what postgresql calls a custom (binary) fo

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

That's an option, but if you wanted to confirm that db performance after your catalog filled up wasn't a factor you could run a backup first. Maybe isolate / protect your current volumes first? Not sure how to go about that. Maybe check permission mask for future restoration and 'chmod 000 Your-vol

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

I ran the smartctl short test and that came back good. Smartctl isn't reporting any errors or degraded test results, so it looks good. There was nothing flaky on the SD end either. On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, 20:23 Rob Gerber, wrote: > What about filesystem performance on your volume or db host(s)? Fail

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

What about filesystem performance on your volume or db host(s)? Failing drives get slower sometimes. Robert Gerber 402-237-8692 r...@craeon.net On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, 3:21 PM Rob Gerber wrote: > That's an option, but if you wanted to confirm that db performance after > your catalog filled up wasn

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

And then import the saved sql dump which drops all the tables again and creates/fills them? -Chris On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, 19:39 Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users, < bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, 10:27 AM Chris Wilkinson > wrote: > > > > Would it fail if no tables e

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, 10:27 AM Chris Wilkinson wrote: Would it fail if no tables exist? If so, I could use the bacula create tables script first. Hello Chris, The Director would probably not even start. :) If you DROP the bacula database, you need to run three scripts: - create_bacula_data

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

I am not sure, but having done 'cat bacula.sql |more' I believe there are table recreation commands in the Bacula catalog backups. I suspect this would be unnecessary, but you are probably on the right track if you ran into trouble of that sort. Robert Gerber 402-237-8692 r...@craeon.net On Wed,

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

Hello Rob This all went fairly easily as you suggested it would. All the original tables were deleted, recreated and populated with the prior contents. That's very nice but it hasn't fixed the problem. Backups are still running at <2MB/s as before so I'm no further forward, but at least I didn't F

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

In my experience running bacula 13.0.x with postgres, catalog restoration has been generally fairly easy. I am not a database expert at all. >From memory, on my phone, while on vacation, so double check stuff yourself: Take a new catalog backup unless you are absolutely certain that your most rec

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

Hello Bill. 'SpoolAttributes' is either unspecified or '= yes' and 'SpoolData' is not used anywhere. The 'big' jobs where this hurts have specifically 'SpoolAttributes = yes', 'SpoolData' not specified. That seems fine as the default for 'SpoolAttributes' is yes. I do have 'Accurate = yes' in al

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula suddenly running very slow

On 8/6/24 9:01 AM, Chris Wilkinson wrote: I've had v11/postgresql13 running well for a long time but just recently it has started to run very slow. The Dir/Fd is on a Raspberry PiB with 8GB memory, Sd on a NAS mounted via CIFS over a Gbe network. I was getting a rate of ~30MB/s on the backup but

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula rescue cdrom source code

On 8/1/24 7:31 AM, William Rice wrote: > Hello I'm trying to locate the bacula-rescue cdrom source code so I can make a Bare Metal Recovery cdrom for bacula-9.0.8 Any help would be greatly appreciated! Hello William, Just a quick FYI: Bacula's Bare Metal recovery for Windows and Linux are

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >