On Sunday 15 October 2006 20:08, Michael Brennen wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 15 October 2006 17:48, Michael Brennen wrote:
> >>
> >> I am starting over with a fresh regress checkout and current
> >> bacula cvs. I will pay attention to every detail so as to t
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Sunday 15 October 2006 17:48, Michael Brennen wrote:
>>
>> I am starting over with a fresh regress checkout and current
>> bacula cvs. I will pay attention to every detail so as to try
>> and duplicate your test conditions. I may have to change the
On Sunday 15 October 2006 17:48, Michael Brennen wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >> They are essentially the same bug. One was running
> >> two-pool-tape, the other 2drive-incremental-2tape, but the mtx
> >> logs show the same failure. Consolidating to #687 is fine.
> >
>
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> They are essentially the same bug. One was running
>> two-pool-tape, the other 2drive-incremental-2tape, but the mtx
>> logs show the same failure. Consolidating to #687 is fine.
>
> Well, two-pool-tape runs fine here too, but I didn't realize it
>
On Sunday 15 October 2006 17:22, Michael Brennen wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > I should have specified more clearly in previous email that I am
> > having problems distinguishing between two bug reports that you
> > have filed. One is bug #687, which is not very clear
On Sunday 15 October 2006 17:14, Michael Brennen wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >> The problem again is that Bacula does the following:
> >>
> >> * loads slot 2 into drive 1
> >> * unloads slot 1 from drive 0
> >> * tries to load slot 2 into drive 0
> >>
> >> The problem is
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I should have specified more clearly in previous email that I am
> having problems distinguishing between two bug reports that you
> have filed. One is bug #687, which is not very clear to me, but
> seems to be similar to bug #689.
>
> For bug 689, I
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> The problem again is that Bacula does the following:
>>
>> * loads slot 2 into drive 1
>> * unloads slot 1 from drive 0
>> * tries to load slot 2 into drive 0
>>
>> The problem is that there is no unload of slot 2 from drive 1
>> prior to attempting to
Kern, if it would help I can set up a VM that you can ssh to work on the real
hardware. It may well be too late to try now, as time is so short, perhaps
when you return?
-- Michael
-Original Message-
From: Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: [Bacula-users] An ide
Hello again,
On Saturday 14 October 2006 01:33, Michael Brennen wrote:
> Hello again Kern,
>
> Sorry to be a pest, but current CVS as of this morning, after your post, is
> still failing the same way it was before.
By the way, I don't consider you to be a pest. There is no problem telling me
On Saturday 14 October 2006 01:33, Michael Brennen wrote:
> Hello again Kern,
>
> Sorry to be a pest, but current CVS as of this morning, after your post, is
> still failing the same way it was before.
>
> I have a totally different autochanger in place now to run the regress
tests.
> It is a
11 matches
Mail list logo
