On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:

>> They are essentially the same bug.  One was running 
>> two-pool-tape, the other 2drive-incremental-2tape, but the mtx 
>> logs show the same failure.  Consolidating to #687 is fine.
>
> Well, two-pool-tape runs fine here too, but I didn't realize it 
> was what is failing for you so I didn't explicitly run it a bunch 
> of times as I did for 2drive-incremental-2tape.
>>
>> My apologies for the confusion; it took me some time to sort out 
>> what I was seeing and get the debug logs right to finally see the 
>> real problem with the missing unload.
>
> As I mentioned, please look into the possibility that a "loaded?" 
> request is returning a 0 rather than the correct value.  This 
> could explain everything. If Bacula thinks nothing is in drive 1 
> and drive 0 it will feel free to load any slot into either drive. 
> This should be easy to confirm one way or another.

I've not looked at the "loaded?" requests from my log snippets to 
see if these are present but will know to look for them.

I am starting over with a fresh regress checkout and current bacula 
cvs.  I will pay attention to every detail so as to try and 
duplicate your test conditions.  I may have to change the 
mtx-changer script to enable the tape offline and inventory but will 
only uncomment what is already there.

    -- Michael

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to