On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I should have specified more clearly in previous email that I am
> having problems distinguishing between two bug reports that you
> have filed. One is bug #687, which is not very clear to me, but
> seems to be similar to bug #689.
>
> For bug 689, I do know which test you are referring to since you
> explicitly mention it in the bug report, but I just would like to
> know if it is the problem you are referring to in this email, or
> if there is another test/problem.
>
> It would be helpful if I could understand which of the two bug
> reports (or both) that what you write here applies to -- i.e.
> which of the two bugs are still giving you problems? Is either
> one fixed? Please add the response to each of the bug reports as
> a bug note, then it will be clear to me if I can close one of the
> bugs or work on both of them.
They are essentially the same bug. One was running two-pool-tape,
the other 2drive-incremental-2tape, but the mtx logs show the same
failure. Consolidating to #687 is fine.
My apologies for the confusion; it took me some time to sort out
what I was seeing and get the debug logs right to finally see the
real problem with the missing unload.
-- Michael
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
