It simply means that you probably had several connections open to the
Director OR after the socket to the Director was closed, the program
(bconsole?) attempted to send another message.
It is probably harmless. It is also pretty difficult to track down
otherwise I would have fixed it. I thi
What is wrong when you get following error message on a restore operation with
BAT:
28-jan 15:02 epo-dir JobId 0: Security Alert: bsock.c:265 Socket has errors=1
on call to
client:192.168.1.100:37728
--
Regards,
Erik P. Olsen
___
Bacula-users mailin
did you label the tapes ? other than the barcode I mean.
it looks like you've replaced an old tape with this new one, but kept the name
of the old one on the label.
if you are sure the tape is brand new, and there are no data on it, just delete
the tape from bacula, and
use the label command on
> Can me help anyone?
>
I do not recall seeing that. I do see read errors but these are for
new never written tapes and the block would be 0:0
You could try running a verify job volume to catalog to see if the
data is consistent. I believe verify now works at 5.2.X
John
Hi All,
Can me help anyone?
Tibor
- Eredeti üzenet -
> Dear Listmembers,
> I get an error when i ran a job:
> bacula-dir Using Device "DELL-TL4000" Tape Error: block.c:1014 Read
> zero bytes at 157:0 on device "DELL-TL4000" (/dev/nst0). Volume
> "26L3" previously written, moving to
Dear Listmembers,
I get an error when i ran a job:
bacula-dir Using Device "DELL-TL4000" Tape Error: block.c:1014 Read zero bytes
at 157:0 on device "DELL-TL4000" (/dev/nst0). Volume "26L3" previously
written, moving to end of data. Tape Ready to append to end of Volume
"26L3" at
On 2012.02.14 10:46, Demeter Tibor wrote:
> I found another strange errors in dmesg
>
> st0: Failed to read 1024 byte block with 80 byte transfer.
>
> Perhaps the two problem is same?
No. The first message you mentioned is not a problem at all.
That, on the other hand, is your tape driver driv
Hi,
I found another strange errors in dmesg
st0: Failed to read 1024 byte block with 80 byte transfer.
st0: Failed to read 1024 byte block with 80 byte transfer.
st0: Failed to read 1024 byte block with 80 byte transfer.
st0: Failed to read 1024 byte block with 80 byte transfer.
st0: Failed to re
> I always get a stange error message when i starting a job to my dell tl4000
> tape library.
>
> Tape
>
> Error:
>
> Volume "33L3" previously written, moving to end of data.
>
> Tape Ready to append to end of Volume "33L3" at file=65.
>
This is normal. Well except for the Error: part. I
Hi,
On 2012.02.13 17:15, Demeter Tibor wrote:
> I always get a stange error message when i starting a job to my dell
> tl4000 tape library.
>
> Tape
>
> Error:
>
> Volume "33L3" previously written, moving to end of data.
>
> Tape Ready to append to end of Volume "33L3" at file=65.
Wh
Dear listmembers,
I always get a stange error message when i starting a job to my dell tl4000
tape library.
Tape Error: Volume "33L3" previously written, moving to end of data. Tape
Ready to append to end of Volume "33L3" at file=65. .
What does mean this? Where is the error o
Hi all,
I have 5 bacula installation, but only in 1 I have this problem..
25-Jan 14:39 netbackup-dir JobId 2044: Volume used once. Marking
Volume "catalog-2011.4.27-7.0" as Used.
25-Jan 14:39 relay-fd JobId 2044: Could not stat
"/var/bacula/working/bacula.sql": ERR=No such file or directory
2
Hi all,
I never had this error:
Error: /home/kern/bacula/k/bacula/src/lib/bsock.c:346 Socket is
terminated=1 on call to client:83.137.169.101:36387
It first appeared after I set up a number of clients (around 20 new
ones) and changed Maximum Concurrent Jobs from 1 to 20.
All the jobs at the wee
John Drescher schrieb:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Christian Gaul
> wrote:
>
>> Christian Gaul wrote:
>>
>>> Hello List,
>>>
>>>
>>> Next i will be trying the btape testsuite again, seeing if something
>>> changed which i didnt see in the changelog that will force me to use
>>> som
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Christian Gaul wrote:
> Christian Gaul wrote:
>> Hello List,
>>
>>
>> Next i will be trying the btape testsuite again, seeing if something
>> changed which i didnt see in the changelog that will force me to use
>> some kind of twoeof or somethingorother option.
>>
Christian Gaul wrote:
> Hello List,
>
>
> Next i will be trying the btape testsuite again, seeing if something
> changed which i didnt see in the changelog that will force me to use
> some kind of twoeof or somethingorother option.
>
Hello again,
a couple of hours later the testsuite has run wi
Hello List,
since upgrading one of my Directors and the connected SD to 3.0.0 last
week, i've noticed that every couple of writes to tape, the volume will
get marked in error because of "Number of Files mismatch".
The same director writing to the same SD on a disk device works without
problems, s
Hi
Ok, Arno you were right. Problem solve!!
El vie, 15-02-2008 a las 13:12 +0100, Arno Lehmann escribió:
> Hi,
>
> 15.02.2008 11:37, Roberto Nebot wrote:
> > Hello folks!
> >
> > I received the following error from gacula running a job and I can not
> > understand what it's happening here. Coul
Hi,
15.02.2008 11:37, Roberto Nebot wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> I received the following error from gacula running a job and I can not
> understand what it's happening here. Could anyone tell me some ideas
> about what is happening here?
>
>
> 15-feb 10:54 fw1-dir JobId 313: Start Backup JobId 31
Hy,
your volume has been recycle
look at this page
http://www.bacula.org/fr/dev-manual/Automatic_Volume_Recycling.html#_ChapterStart22
excuse me for my english!
Roberto Nebot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrito:
> Hello folks!
>
> I received the following error from gacula running a job and I can
Hello folks!
I received the following error from gacula running a job and I can not
understand what it's happening here. Could anyone tell me some ideas
about what is happening here?
15-feb 10:54 fw1-dir JobId 313: Start Backup JobId 313,
Job=pruebas.2008-02-15_10.54.51
15-feb 10:54 fw1-dir JobI
Hi,
14.11.2007 10:03,, Shon Stephens wrote::
> All,
> I'm running Bacula 2.0.3 on Solaris 10. I have had Bacula running
> recently in testing, and am now trying to move to production. However,
> when starting the Director, I get this error:
>
> 14-Nov 03:43 bacula-dir: ERROR TERMINATION at p
All,
I'm running Bacula 2.0.3 on Solaris 10. I have had Bacula running
recently in testing, and am now trying to move to production. However,
when starting the Director, I get this error:
14-Nov 03:43 bacula-dir: ERROR TERMINATION at parse_conf.c:482
Config error: Could not find config Resour
Thanks Arno,
that was my thought too, but i want to have a confirmation.
Sometimes you run in the wrong direction and don't see the easy solution.
Ralf
On 5/8/07, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 5/8/2007 12:38 PM, Ralf Winkler wrote:
> at least it is a strange one for me, but
Hi,
On 5/8/2007 12:38 PM, Ralf Winkler wrote:
> at least it is a strange one for me, but maybe someone here can point it
> out.
>
> I get this error message when i start a job on a remote computer:
>
> 08-May 13:49 Nook-fd: Nook.2007-05-08_13.49.10 Fatal error: Failed to
> connect to Storage d
at least it is a strange one for me, but maybe someone here can point it
out.
I get this error message when i start a job on a remote computer:
08-May 13:49 Nook-fd: Nook.2007-05-08_13.49.10 Fatal error: Failed to
connect to Storage daemon: bluewave-safebox:9103
08-May 13:49 Nook-fd: Nook.2007-0
In the message dated: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:09:39 BST,
The pithy ruminations from Alan Brown on
were:
=> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Erich Prinz wrote:
=>
=> > Others have experienced issues relating to antivirus scan engines
=> > interfering with successful backups. Perhaps it is interfering with
=> >
Hi,
On 3/29/2007 1:28 PM, Brian Debelius wrote:
> For what its worth, I use Nod32 (www.eset.com), I have not had a problem
> with it. Its fast, and has a small footprint. Download a trial, and
> see what happens.
Right, nice to remind me :-)
I also have tried NOD32 and found no more errors w
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Alan Brown wrote:
>> The others have tested by disabling AV then running a test job.
>
> It would be nice if there was a way of telling AV software not to inspect
> files being opened by Bacula
Update:
F-secure helpdesk inform me that if an executable is exempted from
f
For what its worth, I use Nod32 (www.eset.com), I have not had a problem
with it. Its fast, and has a small footprint. Download a trial, and
see what happens.
brian-
Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Erich Prinz wrote:
>
>
>> Others have experienced issues relating to antivirus sca
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Erich Prinz wrote:
> Others have experienced issues relating to antivirus scan engines
> interfering with successful backups. Perhaps it is interfering with
> the communications between the daemons (different machines from what
> I gather.)
>
> The others have tested by disabl
Good call, I have not tried that yet. I'll give that a shot then post
back to the list.
Jason
Erich Prinz wrote:
>
> Others have experienced issues relating to antivirus scan engines
> interfering with successful backups. Perhaps it is interfering with
> the communications between the daemons
Others have experienced issues relating to antivirus scan engines
interfering with successful backups. Perhaps it is interfering with
the communications between the daemons (different machines from what
I gather.)
The others have tested by disabling AV then running a test job.
Erich
On Ma
Anyone else in the list have any idea what might be causing the problem
I'm having? I'm totally at a loss for what to do other than setup a
local director on that server. The backup works fine if the director is
loaded locally.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I already read about that and the "Heart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> I already read about that and the "Heartbeat Interval" has already been
> setup and changed to 90 seconds. I have Heartbeat setup on both the SD and
> the FD of this server. I actually had to setup the Heartbeat to handle a
> different problem with the backup. The Heart
I already read about that and the "Heartbeat Interval" has already been
setup and changed to 90 seconds. I have Heartbeat setup on both the SD and
the FD of this server. I actually had to setup the Heartbeat to handle a
different problem with the backup. The Heartbeat solved that problem but
then c
On Monday 26 March 2007 23:55, Jason King wrote:
> Ok, I've got the debug output of the storage daemon now:
>
> I have the system setup to spool the data to the drive then write to the
> media. Everything looks fine until after the system starts to despool
> everything to tape. Here are the debu
Ok, I've got the debug output of the storage daemon now:
I have the system setup to spool the data to the drive then write to the
media. Everything looks fine until after the system starts to despool
everything to tape. Here are the debug messages from despool on:
dctn-sd: ../../stored/spool
On Monday 26 March 2007 21:54, Brian Debelius wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Monday 26 March 2007 21:38, Jason King wrote:
> >
> >> The problem I have is that this particular SD is running on Windows so
> >> there is no STOUT. Where do I look from there? I can set the -d option
> >> withi
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 26 March 2007 21:38, Jason King wrote:
>
>> The problem I have is that this particular SD is running on Windows so
>> there is no STOUT. Where do I look from there? I can set the -d option
>> within the services options but I just don't know where to look for th
On Monday 26 March 2007 21:38, Jason King wrote:
> The problem I have is that this particular SD is running on Windows so
> there is no STOUT. Where do I look from there? I can set the -d option
> within the services options but I just don't know where to look for the
> debug information.
Well
The problem I have is that this particular SD is running on Windows so
there is no STOUT. Where do I look from there? I can set the -d option
within the services options but I just don't know where to look for the
debug information.
jason
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 26 March 2007 21:20, Ja
On Monday 26 March 2007 21:20, Jason King wrote:
> You mean in the console?
No.
> I set my debug level to 100 and nothing
> different has come through to my console. Where can I get the debug
> information?
Unless you redirect the output, it will appear in the shell from which you
started
You mean in the console? I set my debug level to 100 and nothing
different has come through to my console. Where can I get the debug
information?
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 26 March 2007 19:53, Jason King wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry, I said that wrong. I tried to say the email I got showed the
On Monday 26 March 2007 19:53, Jason King wrote:
> I'm sorry, I said that wrong. I tried to say the email I got showed the
> director sees an errored backup...but the file daemon puts a successful
> backup in its own history logs. I'll try using debugging to see if that
> gives me what I need.
No, I didn't know there was such a thing.
Jaime Ventura wrote:
> Hello Jason,
> Are you using the MAIL ON SUCCESS feature?
>
>Jaime
>
> Jason King wrote:
>> I'm sorry, I said that wrong. I tried to say the email I got showed
>> the director sees an errored backup...but the file daemon puts a
Hello Jason,
Are you using the MAIL ON SUCCESS feature?
Jaime
Jason King wrote:
> I'm sorry, I said that wrong. I tried to say the email I got showed the
> director sees an errored backup...but the file daemon puts a successful
> backup in its own history logs. I'll try using debugging to s
I'm sorry, I said that wrong. I tried to say the email I got showed the
director sees an errored backup...but the file daemon puts a successful
backup in its own history logs. I'll try using debugging to see if that
gives me what I need. Where can I find the debug output?
Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
On Monday 26 March 2007 18:10, Jason King wrote:
> Also, the email I got showed the director does see a successful
> backup...
That seems unlikely because the output you showed below indicates that the job
failed.
> but like I said, the file daemon says the backup WAS successful
> when I do
Also, the email I got showed the director does see a successful
backup...but like I said, the file daemon says the backup WAS successful
when I do a "status client" from the console of the director.
Jason
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Your email title is a bit misleading as this was not successful back
No, it did not die or crash. The SD is still running. I can check it
with the director and it's still running just fine.
Jason
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Your email title is a bit misleading as this was not successful backup.
>
> It looks like the SD might have died ... i.e. probably crashed.
>
>
>
>
Your email title is a bit misleading as this was not successful backup.
It looks like the SD might have died ... i.e. probably crashed.
On Monday 26 March 2007 17:10, Jason King wrote:
> According to my bacula database, my backup of one of my servers ended in
> an error but when I do a status
According to my bacula database, my backup of one of my servers ended in
an error but when I do a status on the servers file daemon, it shows a
successful backup, here is the email I received:
26-Mar 09:01 maint-dir: Start Backup JobId 353, Job=dctn.2007-03-26_09.01.49
26-Mar 09:01 dctn-sd: Wrot
53 matches
Mail list logo
