Re: [Bacula-users] building bacula 9.6.3 with openssl-1.1.1

2020-06-03 Thread Philip Brown
I have done so more compiling of openssl and I can confirm that this is not a problem with having the "api=*.*.*". Bacula seems to work fine on a standard compile of openssl-1.1.1.  (apart from the slight "./configure" modification) From what I have tracked down it looks like one of the LDFLAGS i

Re: [Bacula-users] building bacula 9.6.3 with openssl-1.1.1

2020-06-01 Thread Philip Brown
OK great, thanks for those pointers. I will have a look at this through the week, so will get back to you with what I find. Philip On 6/1/20 8:03 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: > The warning about term.h should be OK. > > There are no useful debug messages in the TLS code, but it looks like the > Dir

Re: [Bacula-users] building bacula 9.6.3 with openssl-1.1.1

2020-06-01 Thread Martin Simmons
The warning about term.h should be OK. There are no useful debug messages in the TLS code, but it looks like the Director is sending non-TLS messages back to the console (that is a common reason for "routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version number" in OpenSSL). I think you will have to run bacula-d

Re: [Bacula-users] building bacula 9.6.3 with openssl-1.1.1

2020-06-01 Thread Philip Brown
Hi Martin, I tried this earlier on to trick "./configure" and led to failure in operation. However, I have tried again with your suggestion, it builds fine. Only the following warnings, which I assume are not related: configure: WARNING: term.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING:

Re: [Bacula-users] building bacula 9.6.3 with openssl-1.1.1

2020-06-01 Thread Martin Simmons
I don't think you are missing anything -- configure just assumes that the old API is available. Hopefully the code itself doesn't depend on the old API, so maybe you can replace that check in configure with something else? E.g. ERR_get_error() __Martin > On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 08:53:01 +0200,

[Bacula-users] building bacula 9.6.3 with openssl-1.1.1

2020-06-01 Thread Philip Brown
Hello Baculistas, I see from the 9.0.6 release notes it is said that Bacula can now be built with openSSL-1.1.1. I have been building bacula 9.6.3 for omnios which comes with openssl-1.0.2 and 1.1.1 (with --api=1.0.0) but could not  get the TLS parts working. I built my own version of openssl-1.1

[Bacula-users] building bacula 9.6.3 with openssl-1.1.1

2020-06-01 Thread Philip Brown
Hello Baculistas, I see from the 9.0.6 release notes it is said that Bacula can now be built with openSSL-1.1.1. I have been building bacula 9.6.3 for omnios which comes with openssl-1.0.2 and 1.1.1 (with --api=1.0.0) but could not  get the TLS parts working. I built my own version of openssl-1.1

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-sd

2011-08-12 Thread Joe Nyland
Hello again, I've actually got a successful configure with the following: "./configure --enable-build-stored --enable-client-only --disable-build-dird --prefix=/usr/local --sysconfdir=/usr/local/etc --mandir=/usr/local/share/man --with-openssl --with-tcp-wrappers --disable-dependency-tracking

[Bacula-users] Building bacula-sd

2011-08-12 Thread Joe Nyland
Hello, This is my first time posting to a list, so apologies if I've made a mistake! I am trying to build the Bacula SD on Mac OS X 10.6. However, I am unable to get the correct combination of ./configure options. I either get error messages saying that I have not selected a database (which I

[Bacula-users] building bacula 5.0.3 for centos 5.5 from SRPMs

2010-09-14 Thread Syn, Joonho
building bacula-bat-5.0.3 from the source rpm seems to build without error. But, when i try to install the resulting bacula-bat rpm it give me the error below: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.13111: line 4: fg: no job control The group bacula has been added to %{group_file}. Here's the command I'm building i

[Bacula-users] Building bacula-gui

2010-01-11 Thread Moray Henderson
Hello List, I came across an issue building the bacula-gui 3.0.3 rpms for el5: the bacula-gui.spec.in file in bacula-gui-3.0.3.tar.gz contains references to the bacula-docs tarball: 58:Source2: bacula-docs-%{version}.tar.gz 169:%setup -c %{name} -T -D -b 2 276:cp -p bacula-docs-%{version}/manual/

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on OpenBSD 4.5

2009-10-16 Thread Mike Erdely
Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:34:57 -0300, Daniel Bareiro said: >> >> On Wednesday, 14 October 2009 17:38:59 +0100, >> Martin Simmons wrote: >> # DGB - 20091012 >> # Starting bacula-fd on boot >> if [ -x /etc/bacula/scripts/bacula-ctl-fd ]; then >> /etc/bacula/scripts/

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on OpenBSD 4.5

2009-10-15 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:34:57 -0300, Daniel Bareiro said: > > On Wednesday, 14 October 2009 17:38:59 +0100, > Martin Simmons wrote: > > > > In the FileSet resource for this client I'm doing backup of all the > > > /etc, but there are some files and directories which aren't able to > > > be c

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on OpenBSD 4.5

2009-10-15 Thread Jari Fredriksson
15.10.2009 14:03, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti: 15.10.2009 13:34, Daniel Bareiro kirjoitti: Do you think that it is appropriate to starting bacula-fd with the script in /etc/bacula/scripts using the following lines in the /etc/rc.local file? # DGB - 20091012 # Starting bacula-fd on boot if [

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on OpenBSD 4.5

2009-10-15 Thread Jari Fredriksson
15.10.2009 13:34, Daniel Bareiro kirjoitti: Do you think that it is appropriate to starting bacula-fd with the script in /etc/bacula/scripts using the following lines in the /etc/rc.local file? # DGB - 20091012 # Starting bacula-fd on boot if [ -x /etc/bacula/scripts/bacula-ctl-fd ]; then

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on OpenBSD 4.5

2009-10-15 Thread Daniel Bareiro
On Wednesday, 14 October 2009 17:38:59 +0100, Martin Simmons wrote: > > In the FileSet resource for this client I'm doing backup of all the > > /etc, but there are some files and directories which aren't able to > > be copied. I consider that this is because the process (running with > > bacula: b

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on OpenBSD 4.5

2009-10-14 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:08:24 -0300, Daniel Bareiro said: > > <...> > fugu:~# uname -a > OpenBSD fugu.freesoftware.org 4.5 KVM3#0 i386 > > fugu:~# ps ax|grep bacula > 12613 ?? Ss 0:03.20 /usr/sbin/bacula-fd -u _bacula -g _bacula -v -c > /etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf > > fugu:~# netstat

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on OpenBSD 4.5

2009-10-14 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi Martin. On Monday, 12 October 2009 20:21:53 +0100, Martin Simmons wrote: > > The make of console draws attention to me since I am only installing > > bacula-fd. > I think the client-only install includes the console because you > sometimes want to run that on the client machine too. It is p

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on OpenBSD 4.5

2009-10-12 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:12:58 -0300, Daniel Bareiro said: > Hi, Martin. > > On Monday, 12 October 2009 11:36:38 +0100, > Martin Simmons wrote: > > > > On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:43:22 -0300, Daniel Bareiro said: > > > > > > I'm trying to compile Bacula 3.0.2 with the source code from the > >

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on OpenBSD 4.5

2009-10-12 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi, Martin. On Monday, 12 October 2009 11:36:38 +0100, Martin Simmons wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:43:22 -0300, Daniel Bareiro said: > > > > I'm trying to compile Bacula 3.0.2 with the source code from the > > official site. For it I've dowloaded the bacula-3.0.2.tar.gz file. > > <...> >

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on OpenBSD 4.5

2009-10-12 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:43:22 -0300, Daniel Bareiro said: > > I'm trying to compile Bacula 3.0.2 with the source code from the > official site. For it I've dowloaded the bacula-3.0.2.tar.gz file. > <...> > Making libbaccfg.la ... > /tmp/bacula-3.0.2/libtool --silent --t

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on OpenBSD 4.5

2009-10-11 Thread Dan Langille
Daniel Bareiro wrote: > Hi, all! > > I'm trying to compile Bacula 3.0.2 with the source code from the > official site. For it I've dowloaded the bacula-3.0.2.tar.gz file. > > I did the configuration using the following syntax: > > # ./configure \ > --prefix=/usr \ > --sbindir=/us

[Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on OpenBSD 4.5

2009-10-11 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi, all! I'm trying to compile Bacula 3.0.2 with the source code from the official site. For it I've dowloaded the bacula-3.0.2.tar.gz file. I did the configuration using the following syntax: # ./configure \ --prefix=/usr \ --sbindir=/usr/sbin \ --sysconfdir=/etc/bacula

Re: [Bacula-users] building bacula storage daemon only

2009-07-20 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 01:34:53 -0500, Bobby Castleberry said: > > Hello all, I am testing Bacula out and running into a bit of confusion. > From the documentation it appears that I can have the storage daemon and > director installed on separate systems. Yes. >

[Bacula-users] building bacula storage daemon only

2009-07-20 Thread Bobby Castleberry
Hello all, I am testing Bacula out and running into a bit of confusion. >From the documentation it appears that I can have the storage daemon and director installed on separate systems. When searching for documentation for just building the storage daemon alone it seems like either it's not p

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on Irix

2008-11-19 Thread Kjetil Torgrim Homme
"ASMR (Anders Sønderberg Mortensen)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm trying to compile the bacula file daemon version 2.4.3 for Irix > (IRIX64 bisse 6.5 07202013 IP35). Here is what I do: > >> setenv CC cc >> ./configure --enable-client-only > > Which looks pretty happy apart from this > > ==>En

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on Irix

2008-11-17 Thread Anders Sønderberg Mortensen
Adding a decent subject. --Anders -Original Message- From: ASMR (Anders Sønderberg Mortensen) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17. november 2008 10:50 To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Bacula-users] (no subject) Hello, I'm trying to compile the bacula file daemon version

[Bacula-users] Building Bacula 2.2.7 brakes in configure

2008-01-25 Thread Erik P. Olsen
I have been unable to configure Bacula 2.2.7. Error message was: configure:3138: error: C preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check See `config.log' for more details. And config.log has many messages like: configure:3069: S? = 1 configure: failed program was: | /* condefs.h. */ config.log is

[Bacula-users] Building Bacula rpm from tarball?

2008-01-18 Thread Timo Neuvonen
I was adviced to try bacula-2.2.8-beta to check if it fixes a problem in my system. However, I wouldn't like to compile/install from tarball in my production server. So, how difficult process is building a source/binary rpm from the tarball that is available in Sourceforge? Somehow I think it migh

Re: [Bacula-users] building bacula 2.2.0 in a 64bits system (ia64) - errors

2007-08-29 Thread Pere Blay
Solved! I missed the --enable-thread-safe-client in the compilation of mysql prior to the building of bacula... that caused the error, it is clearly stated in the documentation then it was my silly mistake :P regards, Pere Blay 2007/8/28, Pere Blay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I'm trying to

[Bacula-users] Building bacula-2.2.0 with bat under debian

2007-08-21 Thread Matthias Albert
Hi, because it costs me to much time to build bacula-2.2.0 under Debian WITH BAT, I thaught it is a good idea to post the required steps for me. Package requirements: apt-get install qt4-qtconfig qt4-dev-tools qt4-designer qt3-dev-tools libqwt-dev libqt4-gui libqt4-qt3support libqt4-dev libqt4-co

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2007-04-12 Thread K WESTERBACK
ED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 3:52:10 PM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD It looks like some significant improvements have been made to st(4): http://www.openbsd.org/plus41.html "Make the s

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2007-04-10 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 15:52, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > It looks like some significant improvements have been made to st(4): > > http://www.openbsd.org/plus41.html > > "Make the st(4) SCSI Tape midlayer return values when receiving a > MTIOCGET ioctl, allows things like Bacula to work much" N

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2007-04-10 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
It looks like some significant improvements have been made to st(4): http://www.openbsd.org/plus41.html "Make the st(4) SCSI Tape midlayer return values when receiving a MTIOCGET ioctl, allows things like Bacula to work much" http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/scsi/st.c Thank you for

Re: [Bacula-users] Building Bacula bacula-2.0.0 on Fedora Core 5

2007-01-12 Thread summer
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello, > > You will surely get better help by asking on the bacula-users list. Hi Kern That may be, but I am on dialup, and was not connected to the Internet, so couldn't check for subscription rules, or subscribe if needed etc. Your name came up when I

Re: [Bacula-users] Building Bacula bacula-2.0.0 on Fedora Core 5

2007-01-10 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 23:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > You will surely get better help by asking on the bacula-users list. > > Hi Kern > That may be, but I am on dialup, and was not connected to the Internet, > so couldn't chec

Re: [Bacula-users] Building Bacula bacula-2.0.0 on Fedora Core 5

2007-01-10 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, You will surely get better help by asking on the bacula-users list. However, what I do note is that you are attempting to configure three databases, and Bacula works with only one of those three. If you want to use SQLite3 then I believe that you need to say something like: ./configu

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2006-12-18 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
Just adding readline and OpenSSL support. Good to go now. ...OpenBSD doesn't have a "portlint" equiv, does it? ~BAS On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, GUILLON Gabriel wrote: This link: http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~seklecki/bacula_openbsd_port.tar seems to be broken Brian A. Seklecki a écrit :

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2006-12-18 Thread GUILLON Gabriel
This link: http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~seklecki/bacula_openbsd_port.tar seems to be broken Brian A. Seklecki a écrit : > > Here is a functional FD on OpenBSD 4.0/i386: > > bash-3.2# uname -a > OpenBSD vmware-sandbox.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com 4.0 > GENERIC.MP+RAIDFRAME#1 > > b

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2006-12-18 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
Here is a functional FD on OpenBSD 4.0/i386: bash-3.2# uname -a OpenBSD vmware-sandbox.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com 4.0 GENERIC.MP+RAIDFRAME#1 bash-3.2# /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -d128 -v -c /usr/local/etc/bacula-fd.conf -f vmware-sandbox-fd: jcr.c:129 read_last_jobs seek

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2006-12-14 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 19:27 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Wednesday 13 December 2006 18:28, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > > > > Stop in /usr/local/src/bacula-1.38.11/src/stored. > > > > > > It looks to me like the OS' header file is badly broken -- at > least in the > > > sense that if it is a Uni

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2006-12-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Since this is directed to me, and assuming I wrote the double >>'ed sections below (which sound a lot like me but so much is snipped that I cannot be sure), I can assure you that, my intention, if I am the guity party was not to insult any person or any particular OS, but just to point o

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2006-12-13 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
> > Stop in /usr/local/src/bacula-1.38.11/src/stored. > > It looks to me like the OS' header file is badly broken -- at least in the > sense that if it is a Unix system, both mt_fileno and mt_blkno should be > defined in the struct mtget. > > Someone should fix the OS, barring that we will need

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2006-11-10 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:48, Russell Sutherland wrote: > There does not seem to be a port for Bacula for OpenBSD 4.0. > > I've tried building the package from source. > > After configuration, the "make" fails when trying to compile > the stored code: > > ==>Entering directory /usr/local/

[Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2006-11-08 Thread Russell Sutherland
There does not seem to be a port for Bacula for OpenBSD 4.0. I've tried building the package from source. After configuration, the "make" fails when trying to compile the stored code: ==>Entering directory /usr/local/src/bacula-1.38.11/src/dird Make of dird is good ==>Entering directo

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on Solaris 9 / 10

2005-12-20 Thread Alex Moore
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:38:10 + Juliet Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alternatively, since all I need is the fd client: does anyone have a > functioning bacula-fd binary for Solaris 9 & Solaris 10 (2 separate > machines) which they could send me/point me at? See www.blastwave.org Alex -

[Bacula-users] Building bacula-fd on Solaris 9 / 10

2005-12-20 Thread Juliet Kemp
Hi, I need to do a client-only (i.e. I only need bacula-fd) build on Solaris 9 & Solaris 10, & am having problems. The installation instructions at talk about needing the packages: SUNWbinutils, SUNWarc, SUNWhea, SUNWGcc, SUNWGnutls SUNWGnutls-devel SUNWGmake SUNWgccruntime SUNWlibgcrypt SUNWzl

[Bacula-users] Building bacula on Solaris8

2005-12-05 Thread Birger Blixt
Hello. I can't understand why my build for Solaris 8 always fail to set the date in mysql Media "LastWritten" :-/ I run bacula 1.36.1 in production with a Adic Scalar AIT 480 changer , and I failed with that too, and was forced to get a prebuild from blastwave.org. Since 1.38.2 has a better aut

Re: [Bacula-users] building bacula

2005-05-12 Thread le dahut
earlier in the build output : "cannot find -lstdc++" urpmi libstdc++5-static-devel solved the problem. Le jeudi 12 mai 2005 à 10:35 +0200, le dahut a écrit : > Hi, > While trying to build bacula RPM from bacula-1.36.3-1.src.rpm downloaded > today, I got this error message : > > """ > make[1]:

[Bacula-users] building bacula

2005-05-12 Thread le dahut
Hi, While trying to build bacula RPM from bacula-1.36.3-1.src.rpm downloaded today, I got this error message : """ make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/bacula-1.36.3/src/tools' + cd src/filed + strip static-bacula-fd strip: static-bacula-fd: No such file or directory """ Someone has an