I was adviced to try bacula-2.2.8-beta to check if it fixes a problem in my system. However, I wouldn't like to compile/install from tarball in my production server.
So, how difficult process is building a source/binary rpm from the tarball that is available in Sourceforge? Somehow I think it might be quite a straightforward job (comparable to building a binary rpm from a source rpm) if the previous (2.2.7) spec file would still work with this release. Is this documented anywhere, what I found from the manual was about building binary rpms from source rpm, I think. Regards, Timo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
