On 10/02/2016 09:03 PM, Jan Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, if not Debian, maybe we can interest Ubuntu in fixing the 7.0.5
> bacula in their 16.04 distribution, since it's an LTS version. That
> would help those distros that inherit from Ubuntu, like Mint, maybe?
>
> -Jan
>
> On 10/02/2016 09:58 AM
Um 12:03 Uhr am 02.10.16 schrieb Jan Martin:
> Well, if not Debian, maybe we can interest Ubuntu in fixing the 7.0.5
> bacula in their 16.04 distribution, since it's an LTS version. That
> would help those distros that inherit from Ubuntu, like Mint, maybe?
No need to do this, there is already
Hi,
Well, if not Debian, maybe we can interest Ubuntu in fixing the 7.0.5
bacula in their 16.04 distribution, since it's an LTS version. That
would help those distros that inherit from Ubuntu, like Mint, maybe?
-Jan
On 10/02/2016 09:58 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> On 02.10.2016 09:08, Hankins, Jo
On 02.10.2016 09:08, Hankins, Jonathan wrote:
> Even though it's fixed in the 7.4.x from Ubuntu (probably in debian
> too), if it's indeed broken in debian, I'm going to ask if they can
> release an update to their 7.0.5 package in testing, so that people who
> track that, or distros that are deri
On 10/02/2016 09:08 AM, Hankins,
Jonathan wrote:
I'll have to dig a bit, but I
know the package source in Mint 18 is unmodified from Ubuntu
xenial, and I didn't see any indication that it was different
than what's in debian.
Hello Jonathan,
The only hope you have to get these changes made is to either
submit a Feature Request in the bugs database for each one, or
submit a patch -- also to the bugs database.
With emails, these ideas disappear in about a half hour as our
I'll have to dig a bit, but I know the package source in Mint 18 is
unmodified from Ubuntu xenial, and I didn't see any indication that it was
different than what's in debian.
I think what may be happening is, Ubuntu xenial (a LTS release IIRC) tracks
something newer than debian stable (maybe test
Kern,
If there's any work to improve the error from bconsole when the max console
connections are exceeded, it may be helpful to add a debug msg on the
director indicating this too...i think was running under debug level 9
and didn't see anything indicating that condition.
For that matter, ma
I have not heard of this on Debian, but
it is a problem on Ubuntu and in their bugzilla database. I
suspect that even though Ubuntu takes a number of Debian packages,
they probably add some different linking options.
On 10/02/2016 01:41 AM, Sven Hartge wro
Hello,
When one uses the -Bsymbolic_functions link option, the effect on
Bacula is that the default values will not in all cases be set
correctly. The exact mechanism is a bit complicated but I think it
applies mostly to the Director. The "workaround" for this problem
(requiring no rebuildi
On 01.10.2016 16:51, Hankins, Jonathan wrote:
> It seems weird that the bacula package in Debian and Ubuntu, et al, is
> broken and no one has noticed (checked Debian bug database). I know
> Debian has been on 5.x in the stable release for years (still is). It's
> possible that 7.0.5 got packaged
Thanks to Kern, John, and Josh,
It seems I am not crazy after all :). So the current release version
from Mint 18 seems to be compiled with a link switch
-Bsymbolic_functions, which makes it not work. The version lines for my
bacula-dir and bconsole:
trinity% sudo /usr/sbin/bacula-dir -?
Cop
I cannot say for sure about Debian, but
for Ubuntu there are/were bug reports open. All have been
resolved by the packagers with my input. What happened with
Ubuntu is that they simply
packaged it and released it without testing (surely due to lack of
time
It seems weird that the bacula package in Debian and Ubuntu, et al, is
broken and no one has noticed (checked Debian bug database). I know Debian
has been on 5.x in the stable release for years (still is). It's possible
that 7.0.5 got packaged for their testing release and maybe Ubuntu xenial
picke
Hello Josh,
Yes, if you build either with -D fortify-source=2 or link with -Bsymbolic-functions, Bacula will
fail. It is best
to stick with the Bacula recommended build options, which is
what you are using.
Also if you have a Bacula
On 10/1/2016 2:44 AM, Hankins, Jonathan wrote:
So I've narrowed it down. If I build from Debian's patched source, but
run ./configure myself, my flags in config.out look like:
Compiler flags: -g -O2 -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing
-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
Linker flags:
However, if I b
So I've narrowed it down. If I build from Debian's patched source, but run
./configure myself, my flags in config.out look like:
Compiler flags: -g -O2 -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti
Linker flags:
However, if I build using debian's rules file, my flags in config.ou
So I built the source package on Mint 18 (it's from Debian upstream) and it
is still broken. Then, I extracted the original source from the Debian
package, and didn't apply the debian patches
(except switch-nonfree-sha1-to-openssl.patch, which I had to do to get it
to build). I set prefix to /opt/b
Jan,
I am assuming you're on the latest Mint (18) -- my Mint 18 workstation
loaded bacula 7.0.5 when I installed it just now. I am having the same
issue with the default config, so let me play with it and see what I can
come up with.
-Jonathan Hankins
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 6:29 PM Jan Martin
Hi,
On my system, you are right. dir runs as bacula:bacula, sd runs as
bacula:tape, and fd runs as root:root
trinity% bconsole -?
Copyright (C) 2000-2014 Free Software Foundation Europe e.V.
Version: 7.0.5 (28 July 2014) x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ubuntu 16.04
Usage: bconsole [-s] [-c config_file] [
I believe the FD is the inly thing that needs to run as root. I think on
Debian/Ubuntu/Mint, the dir runs as bacula:bacula and the SD as
bacula:tape, but I may be wrong.
Are you sure that your bconsole is 7.0.5 as well? Check everything with:
dpkg -l \*bacula\*
and:
which bconsole
...Just to m
I'm not sure, but bacula services must be run as root both user and group.
Em 30/09/2016 5:59 PM, "Jan Martin" escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> OK, I just killed the currently running bacula-dir daemon (the nice way,
> from the init.d script), and restarted it with the same command line, but
> added -d200.
Hi,
OK, I just killed the currently running bacula-dir daemon (the nice way,
from the init.d script), and restarted it with the same command line,
but added -d200. Got some extra stuff at the beginning:
trinity% sudo /usr/sbin/bacula-dir -d200 -c /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf
-u bacula -g bacul
You tried to execute bacula-dir in debug mode?
# bacula-dir -d200
Em 30/09/2016 4:49 PM, "Jan Martin" escreveu:
> Hello bacula-users!
>
> I'm having a problem that I can't figure out, so I hope someone here can
> help out.
>
> I have been using bacula 5.2.x for backing up my Mint linux box and
Hello bacula-users!
I'm having a problem that I can't figure out, so I hope someone here can
help out.
I have been using bacula 5.2.x for backing up my Mint linux box and a
couple of Macs. The latest version of Mint goes to bacula v7.0.5, so I
installed that after saving my old database and s
25 matches
Mail list logo
