[Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration

2018-10-04 Thread Steven Hammond
I've run into a problem of late.  For some strange reason, Bacula is marking my tape USED in the middle of the nightly backup jobs.  It just started to do this over the last week.  We rotate tapes daily and the volume use duration is set to 12 hours.  The first job kicks off at 5PM but around m

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration not working in 5.2.1

2011-11-26 Thread Fahrer, Julian
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Phil Stracchino [mailto:ala...@metrocast.net] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. November 2011 18:15 > An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration not working in 5.2.1 > > On 11/24/11 11:01,

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration not working in 5.2.1

2011-11-25 Thread Dietz Pröpper
Fahrer, Julian: > Hi, > > Am I missing something or is the "Volume Use Duration" parameter in the > pool not working in 5.2.1? [...] > > Mediaid 5 & 8 should actually be in status "used". It is 2011-11-24 > 17:00 right now... > Same thing for other pools with "Volume Use Duration = 12 days" > >

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration not working in 5.2.1

2011-11-24 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 11/24/11 11:01, Fahrer, Julian wrote: > Hi, > > Am I missing something or is the "Volume Use Duration" parameter in the > pool not working in 5.2.1? > > I defined the pool like this: > --- > Pool { > Name = NEO200S_Weekly_Pool > Pool Type = Backup > Recycle = yes > AutoPrune = yes >

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration not working in 5.2.1

2011-11-24 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Fahrer, Julian wrote: > Hi, > > Am I missing something or is the "Volume Use Duration" parameter in the > pool not working in 5.2.1? > > I defined the pool like this: > --- > Pool { >  Name = NEO200S_Weekly_Pool >  Pool Type = Backup >  Recycle = yes >  AutoPrune

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration not working in 5.2.1

2011-11-24 Thread Thomas Mueller
On 24.11.2011 17:01, Fahrer, Julian wrote: > Hi, > > Am I missing something or is the "Volume Use Duration" parameter in the > pool not working in 5.2.1? > > I defined the pool like this: > --- > Pool { >Name = NEO200S_Weekly_Pool >Pool Type = Backup >Recycle = yes >AutoPrune = yes

[Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration not working in 5.2.1

2011-11-24 Thread Fahrer, Julian
Hi, Am I missing something or is the "Volume Use Duration" parameter in the pool not working in 5.2.1? I defined the pool like this: --- Pool { Name = NEO200S_Weekly_Pool Pool Type = Backup Recycle = yes AutoPrune = yes Volume Retention = 31 days Volume Use Duration = 72h Storage =

[Bacula-users] volume use duration exceeded right after being recyled?

2009-02-11 Thread Ralf Gross
Hi, I purged some volumes of a failed backup and manually changed the state to recycle. Now I see this in the bacula log: 11-Feb 08:19 VU0EA003-sd JobId 9460: Recycled volume "A00045L4" on device "ULTRIUM-TD4-D2" (/dev/ULTRIUM-TD4-D2), all previous data lost. 11-Feb 08:19 VUMEM004-dir JobId 946

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume use duration

2007-01-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 08 January 2007 16:35, Amiche wrote: > Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the status of > the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated. Bacula changes the status only the next time it wants to use the volume. > So I defined "Volume

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume use duration

2007-01-08 Thread Dan Langille
On 8 Jan 2007 at 16:36, James Cort wrote: > Bill Moran wrote: > > In response to Amiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > >> Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the > >> status of > >> the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated. > >> So I def

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume use duration

2007-01-08 Thread James Cort
Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Amiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the >> status of >> the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated. >> So I defined "Volume Use Duration = 10h" but Bacula wait for the n

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume use duration

2007-01-08 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Amiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the status > of > the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated. > So I defined "Volume Use Duration = 10h" but Bacula wait for the next job > using > this volume

[Bacula-users] Volume use duration

2007-01-08 Thread Amiche
Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the status of the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated. So I defined "Volume Use Duration = 10h" but Bacula wait for the next job using this volume to mark it as Used,and not immediatly after the last job.

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration

2006-03-17 Thread Ralf Gross
Beren said: > I've got a Volume Use Duration of 23h on my pool, but for some reason > bacula (1.38.5) marks it as used after only a couple of hours after it > starts backing up. Have there been volumes in that pool before you added the 'Volume Use Duration' parameter? If so, you have to update th

[Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration

2006-03-17 Thread Beren
Hi Everyone, I've got a Volume Use Duration of 23h on my pool, but for some reason bacula (1.38.5) marks it as used after only a couple of hours after it starts backing up. Any ideas? Cheers, Beren --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML,

Re: Time to Up the debugging leve (WAS: Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration = not honored)

2006-02-14 Thread Dan Langille
I remove the ^M's On 14 Feb 2006 at 17:40, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > ...with -d9, here are the relevant decision making parts: > > Without looking at the code, I think this may be a database error > related to: > > mindwipe-dir: postgresql.c:334 my_postgresql_fetch_row finishes > returning

Time to Up the debugging leve (WAS: Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration = not honored)

2006-02-14 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
...with -d9, here are the relevant decision making parts: Without looking at the code, I think this may be a database error related to: mindwipe-dir: postgresql.c:334 my_postgresql_fetch_row finishes returning 8128018^M mindwipe-dir: next_vol.c:62 catreq after find_next_vol ok=1 FW=0^M mindwi

[Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration = not honored

2006-02-14 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
Platform: $ uname -a FreeBSD mindwipe 5.3-RELEASE-p23 FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p23 #0: Wed Oct 12 -bash-2.05b$ pkg_info |grep -i bacula bacula-client-1.38.5_1 The network backup solution (client) bacula-server-1.38.5_1 The network backup solution (server) Here's what I know so far: *) This bug is n

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration

2005-04-13 Thread David Clymer
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 11:59 +0200, Alexander Bergolth wrote: > Hi! > > The manual says that the Pool directive "Volume Use Duration" is only > checked at the end of a job that writes to a volume. > Is there a way to manually trigger this check? (E.g. to mark all > "Appendable" daily volumes as U

[Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration

2005-04-13 Thread Alexander Bergolth
Hi! The manual says that the Pool directive "Volume Use Duration" is only checked at the end of a job that writes to a volume. Is there a way to manually trigger this check? (E.g. to mark all "Appendable" daily volumes as Used when doing a full backup?) I could set the Volume Use Duration so tha