Hello,
niedz., 18 lis 2018 o 11:18 Sebastian Suchanek
napisał(a):
> Hi everyone!
>
> In my Bacula installation (v7.4.4, Debian), I have a certain Full backup
> job that is configured to go to a pool of tapes. One run of this backup
> job currently spans abot 2.5 tapes. In order to make handling
Hi everyone!
In my Bacula installation (v7.4.4, Debian), I have a certain Full backup
job that is configured to go to a pool of tapes. One run of this backup
job currently spans abot 2.5 tapes. In order to make handling of the
tapes a bit more easier (I'm taking them to an off-site storage and wil
A volume goes from state Append to state Full when an attempt to write more
data to it fails because there's no space left.
A volume goes from state Append to state Used when its maximum use time expires.
In both cases, Bacula will not attempt to write more data to it.
In both cases you can set t
Hi there!
Does anyone know the difference between these two status for a volume, Used and
Full ?
Can you write data on a tape "Used" ?
Thank you!
Thibault
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's m
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:53:15AM +0530, Deepak wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> While testing Recycling configuration for volumes. I am facing a issue.
>
> My volumes are in Full status even after expiration of Volume
> Retention period.
>
> I have used "Volume Retention = 3 hours" in pools
>
> "Job Reten
Hello,
2013/9/24 Deepak
> (...)
> 1) I have removed complete mysql database using drop_mysql_tables and
> then created new tables using make_mysql_table command . Every thing
> is clean now in database except one thing. When I am checking director
> with status director command in bconsole. then
Quoting John Drescher :
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Deepak wrote:
>
>> Hi ,
>>
>> While testing Recycling configuration for volumes. I am facing a issue.
>>
>> My volumes are in Full status even after expiration of Volume
>> Retention period.
>>
>> I have used "Volume Retention = 3 hours"
Hi,
There is a very good explanation about automatic volume recycling here:
http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/Automatic_Volume_Recycling.html
Regards,
Ana
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Deepak wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> While testing Recycling configuration for volumes. I am facing a iss
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Deepak wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> While testing Recycling configuration for volumes. I am facing a issue.
>
> My volumes are in Full status even after expiration of Volume
> Retention period.
>
> I have used "Volume Retention = 3 hours" in pools
>
> "Job Retention = 4 mont
Hi ,
While testing Recycling configuration for volumes. I am facing a issue.
My volumes are in Full status even after expiration of Volume
Retention period.
I have used "Volume Retention = 3 hours" in pools
"Job Retention = 4 months" and "File Retention = 4 months" in client
but 6 hours af
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:49:02 +0200, Wolfram Schlich said:
>
> Hi!
>
> What exactly do the different volume status values mean
> and when or what are they being used for by Bacula?
>
> Currently, the Media.VolStatus field can have the
> following values:
>
> Append
> Archive
>
Hi!
What exactly do the different volume status values mean
and when or what are they being used for by Bacula?
Currently, the Media.VolStatus field can have the
following values:
Append
Archive
Busy
Cleaning
Disabled
Error
Full
Pur
Hi,
30.01.2008 09:23, Александар Петрески wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This morning i have this message in my mailbox:
> Please mount Volume "FullBackup3" or label a new one for:
> Job: JobBackup.2008-01-30_01.00.05
> Storage: "HPUltrium" (/dev/nst0)
>
> Using bconsole i checked al
Александар Петрески wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This morning i have this message in my mailbox:
> Please mount Volume "FullBackup3" or label a new one for:
> Job: JobBackup.2008-01-30_01.00.05
> Storage: "HPUltrium" (/dev/nst0)
>
> Using bconsole i checked all messages and if i try
Hi all,
This morning i have this message in my mailbox:
Please mount Volume "FullBackup3" or label a new one for:
Job: JobBackup.2008-01-30_01.00.05
Storage: "HPUltrium" (/dev/nst0)
Using bconsole i checked all messages and if i try to mount the volume
(which previously was
Arno Lehmann schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> 10.12.2007 22:56,, Daniel Haas wrote::
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a problem with Bacula 2.2.5 on a Debian Etch.
>> Every Friday I make a Full Backup and from Monday to Thursday a made an
>> Incremental Backup to the harddisk. Every day Bacula have to execute 11
>
Hi,
10.12.2007 22:56,, Daniel Haas wrote::
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem with Bacula 2.2.5 on a Debian Etch.
> Every Friday I make a Full Backup and from Monday to Thursday a made an
> Incremental Backup to the harddisk. Every day Bacula have to execute 11
> Jobs, one for every server.
> Espac
> I have to backup about 150GB with that job. Is that to much? Is it
> better to split that job?
>
No that is not too much as long as it completes in less than a day. I
have done 2TB in a single backup to LTO2 tapes that completed in 12 to
15 hours.
John
--
Hi all,
I have a problem with Bacula 2.2.5 on a Debian Etch.
Every Friday I make a Full Backup and from Monday to Thursday a made an
Incremental Backup to the harddisk. Every day Bacula have to execute 11
Jobs, one for every server.
Espacially one job on Friday (Full) has always the problem, tha
> Yesterday around noon, I unmounted a volume from our tape-loader and forgot
> to mount another volume. Anyhow, when the nightly backups kicked in 9:00PM,
> all the jobs started but I never got an email alert from Bacula asking for a
> manual mount of a volume. This morning, noticing the first job
Hi folks,
Yesterday around noon, I unmounted a volume from our tape-loader and forgot
to mount another volume. Anyhow, when the nightly backups kicked in 9:00PM,
all the jobs started but I never got an email alert from Bacula asking for a
manual mount of a volume. This morning, noticing the first
On Monday 29 January 2007 09:59, Florian Schürfeld wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> can someone provide me with a more detailed description of Volume
> Status.
>
> I fully understood about "Append" and "Full", but i.g. wheres the
> differnce between "Used" and "Full".
This is a good subject for documentatio
Hi there,
can someone provide me with a more detailed description of Volume
Status.
I fully understood about "Append" and "Full", but i.g. wheres the
differnce between "Used" and "Full".
regards
--
Florian Schürfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:43:15 +0100, Christoff Buch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> (on the bconsole) by doing: update - Volume parameters - (choosing pool
> and entering media id), then choosing Volume Status you can get to:
>
> Possible Values are:
> 1: Append
> 2: Archive
>
Hello there,
(on the bconsole) by doing: update -
Volume parameters - (choosing pool and entering media id), then choosing
Volume Status you can get to:
Possible Values are:
1: Append
2: Archive
3: Disabled
4: Full
5: Used
6: Cleaning
7: Read-Only
Question is:
Hello!
Is there a script or utility I can use to verify
the backup on the tape?
Does bacula support hardware compression? How well does it work
generally?
Generally its safe to use your
database frontend to manage some tape values. And its really faster to
change a hign number of rec
Is there a script or utility I can use to verify the backup on the tape?
Does bacula support hardware compression? How well does it work generally?
If I can recover files from the first volume, does it mean the volume
and backup are ok?
Simon
Phil Stracchino wrote:
Simon Gao wrote:
Hi,
Simon Gao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just started using Bacula and completed backup to the first volume. Now
> backup moved to second volume. However, the volume status for the first
> volume shows error.
> Also the size of data put on the volume seems larger
> than the spec (176G vs 160G).
This is quite
> Hi,
>
> Just started using Bacula and completed backup to
> the first volume. Now
> backup moved to second volume. However, the volume
> status for the first
> volume shows error. Also the size of data put on the
> volume seems larger
> than the spec (176G vs 160G).
>
I'd bet this is because
Hi,
Just started using Bacula and completed backup to the first volume. Now
backup moved to second volume. However, the volume status for the first
volume shows error. Also the size of data put on the volume seems larger
than the spec (176G vs 160G).
We are using Quantum SuperLoader 320 libr
30 matches
Mail list logo
