Simon Gao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just started using Bacula and completed backup to the first volume. Now
> backup moved to second volume. However, the volume status for the first
> volume shows error.
> Also the size of data put on the volume seems larger
> than the spec (176G vs 160G).
This is quite reasonable. I'm using LTO1 with 100GB tapes for Full
backups, and getting as much as 130GB of data on them with hardware
compression. The errored state is a problem, though. My experience is
that this does occasionally happen, though I can't nail down any single
cause for it. It usually means that the number of files on the volume
and the number of files recorded in the catalog for that volume do not
match, but what causes the mismatch varies.
--
Phil Stracchino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Renaissance Man, Unix generalist, Perl hacker
Mobile: 603-216-7037 Landline: 603-886-3518
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
