Mandi! Marco Gaiarin
In chel di` si favelave...
> OK, things start working. The script do correctly snapshot; if needed, i can
> simply mount the snapshot elsewhere via a simple 'mount -t zfs'.
Ok, only a note to say, afer some long time, that i've abandoned the 'zfs
snapshot' script.
After so
> You select only the Incremental job to restore, of course the data
> is in one of the previous job. We can probably improve the error
> message, or remove the meta-data-only record that is reported
> as a file.
>
> I do not recommend to use the jobid= parameter in the restore
> command line unles
Hello Dragan,
On 9/27/24 14:16, Dragan Milivojević wrote:
Search the mailing list for a thread that I started a few days ago. It
breaks bacula by saving empty files, no metadata, only name is saved.
I have looked more closely, and your restore command is incorrect.
You select only the Increme
Hello Dragan,
On 9/27/24 14:16, Dragan Milivojević wrote:
Search the mailing list for a thread that I started a few days ago. It
breaks bacula by saving empty files, no metadata, only name is saved.
Did you open an issue on the bug tracker? gitlab.bacula.org
Thanks
Best Regards,
Eric
___
Mandi! Marco Gaiarin
In chel di` si favelave...
> No, i'm still working on snapshotting, next step backup; i've not clear if
> Include{} and Exclude{} fileset directive apply to 'stippath' or
> 'non-strippath' path...
OK, things start working. The script do correctly snapshot; if needed, i can
Mandi! Arno Lehmann
In chel di` si favelave...
> So I guess a good recommendation would be to make sure strippath is
> applied to *all* paths in a file set, unless you are really sure you
> know what you do.
Uh, oh... clearly sure!
> Also, did you per chance already try, in combination with
Hi Marco,
Am 07.10.2024 um 14:50 schrieb Marco Gaiarin:
Mandi! Gary R. Schmidt
In chel di` si favelave...
...
...i don't think is about restoring, but backing up; indeed the example could
be instead: if you have a fileset with an
exactly.
And with paths such as /usr/bin and /.snap/bin i
Mandi! Gary R. Schmidt
In chel di` si favelave...
> Because it does exactly what it says it will do.
> If you backup /a/b/c/d, and then restore it with "strippath=1" it will
> restore to /b/c/d.
> If you have some pre-existing /b/c/d it's now been over-written, or
> overlaid, if you prefer..
On 05/10/2024 02:16, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
[SNIP]
> > Doc say:
strippath=integer
This option will cause integer paths to be stripped from the front of the
full path/filename being backed up. This can be useful if you are migrating
data from another vendor or if you have taken a snapshot
Mandi! Arno Lehmann
In chel di` si favelave...
> Look at
> https://www.bacula.org/15.0.x-manuals/en/main/Configuring_Director.html#SECTION002370
>
> and search for "strippath" :-)
Uh, oh! And was available also on 9.4!
https://www.bacula.org/9.4.x-manuals/en/main/Con
Hi Marco,
Am 02.10.2024 um 18:07 schrieb Marco Gaiarin:
...
Initially i supposed Bacula will have some 'ignore prefix' parameters that
will permit that, but this is available only on restore, not backup. For
backup, data have to be 'rooted' (mounted) on the same path...
Look at
https://www.ba
Mandi! Josip Deanovic via Bacula-users
In chel di` si favelave...
>> Bacula will just do it. Nothing special required.
> This statement might be misleading in this particular case Marco
> described.
> Bacula will be able to run incremental backup but if the mountpoint is
> changing every time
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024, at 3:42 AM, Josip Deanovic via Bacula-users wrote:
> On 2024-10-01 03:16, Dan Langille wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024, at 10:48 AM, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
>>> Mandi! Dan Langille
>>> In chel di` si favelave...
>>>
From
https://dan.langille.org/2023/12/24/backing-up-
On 2024-10-01 03:16, Dan Langille wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024, at 10:48 AM, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
Mandi! Dan Langille
In chel di` si favelave...
From
https://dan.langille.org/2023/12/24/backing-up-freebsd-with-bacula-via-zfs-snapshot/
:
I'm still doing some experimentation on this, indeed.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024, at 10:48 AM, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> Mandi! Dan Langille
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
>> From
>> https://dan.langille.org/2023/12/24/backing-up-freebsd-with-bacula-via-zfs-snapshot/
>> :
>
> I'm still doing some experimentation on this, indeed.
>
>
>> It doesn't all run a
Mandi! Josip Deanovic via Bacula-users
In chel di` si favelave...
> Unless the "Ignore FileSet Change" option is used, Bacula will compare the MD5
> checksum of the Include/Exclude contents of the FileSet and decide whether a
> Full backup is needed or not.
> I don't recommend using this option
Mandi! Dan Langille
In chel di` si favelave...
> From
> https://dan.langille.org/2023/12/24/backing-up-freebsd-with-bacula-via-zfs-snapshot/
> :
I'm still doing some experimentation on this, indeed.
> It doesn't all run as incrementals. If the list of DATASETS (see above URL)
> does not ch
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024, at 7:02 AM, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> Mandi! Arno Lehmann
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
>> I have not looked up the discussion leading here.
>
> See my previous post: i'm fighting with ZFS. ;-)
>
>
>> What I usually prefer is a combination of a Run Script on the client to
>>
Search the mailing list for a thread that I started a few days ago. It
breaks bacula by saving empty files, no metadata, only name is saved.
On Fri, 27 Sept 2024, 10:28 Josip Deanovic via Bacula-users, <
bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> On 2024-09-26 17:01, Dragan Milivojević wrote:
>
On 2024-09-26 17:01, Dragan Milivojević wrote:
For example, while browsing/restoring backup of the specific date, you
would
get the state of a backed up directory as it was during the execution
of
a
selected backup job.
I would recommend the "accurate" option in this case.
Be careful with the
> For example, while browsing/restoring backup of the specific date, you
> would
> get the state of a backed up directory as it was during the execution of
> a
> selected backup job.
> I would recommend the "accurate" option in this case.
Be careful with the accurate option, if you use the recomme
On 2024-09-26 13:02, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
Hello Marco!
Or it is still the 'fileset change' the trigger, so scripts can make
all the
dumbest things, but bacula keep going on incrementals?
Also, if my script mount on '/some/dirs-202040926' and pass this as a
backup
dir for a full, but tomorrow
Mandi! Arno Lehmann
In chel di` si favelave...
> I have not looked up the discussion leading here.
See my previous post: i'm fighting with ZFS. ;-)
> What I usually prefer is a combination of a Run Script on the client to
> create a file list to back up, and a File= entry in the include list
Hi Marco,
Am 13.09.2024 um 17:42 schrieb Marco Gaiarin:
Mandi! Marco Gaiarin
In chel di` si favelave...
EG, i'll come back on this on mid-september...
Still working on script.
I have not looked up the discussion leading here.
For a sake of mental health i want to mount snapshot on di
Mandi! Marco Gaiarin
In chel di` si favelave...
> EG, i'll come back on this on mid-september...
Still working on script.
For a sake of mental health i want to mount snapshot on different mount
point... so different file path.
But path are defined in filesets, and i cannot define adifferent f
Mandi! Dan Langille
In chel di` si favelave...
>>
>> https://dan.langille.org/2023/12/24/backing-up-freebsd-with-bacula-via-zfs-snapshot/
> How is that working out?
You don't know?! ;-)
I'm currently on holiday; i'll come back next week, but i need to move
and/or do some other tasks.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024, at 11:03 AM, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> Mandi! Andrea Venturoli
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
>> Probably yes, but why bother?
>> Just take multiple snapshots: they have by default a different
>> mountpoint and don't take any space.
>
> Right... never minded about that... i've
Mandi! Andrea Venturoli
In chel di` si favelave...
> Probably yes, but why bother?
> Just take multiple snapshots: they have by default a different
> mountpoint and don't take any space.
Right... never minded about that... i've also found some example:
https://dan.langille.org/2023/1
On 7/26/24 14:31, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
Yes, FS is ZFS so i can snapshot them. But FS/mountpoint is the same for all
data, and i've 5 jobs for spliting and optimizing them.
There's some way to 'snapshot' FS only one time, with multiple jobs?
Probably yes, but why bother?
Just take multiple sn
Mandi! Josip Deanovic via Bacula-users
In chel di` si favelave...
> Alternatively, Bacula has the noatime option which is not set by
> default.
I've give it a try. Seems it is useful, rather not dramatic.
Thanks!
--
___
Bacula-users mailing l
Mandi! Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users
In chel di` si favelave...
> The typical way to help with this type of situation is to create several
> Fileset/Job pairs and then run them all
> concurrently. Each Job would be reading a different set of directories.
Finally we have splitted data using m
Mandi! Dan Langille
In chel di` si favelave...
> Do your filesystem have any snapshot capabilities? With that many files,
> backing up a snapshot would give you better results with respect to
> consistency.
Cool! Never minded about that!
Yes, FS is ZFS so i can snapshot them. But FS/mountpo
On 2024-07-15 17:26, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
We have found that a dir (containing mostly home directories) with
roughly
one and a half million files, took too much time to be backud up; it is
not
a problem of backup media, also with spooling it took hours to prepare
a
spool.
There's some strateg
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024, at 11:26 AM, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> For example, currently i have:
>
> Options {
> Signature = MD5
> accurate = sm
> }
>
> if i remove signature and check only size, i can gain some performance?
You might. You also lose integrity checks - is the file I ju
On 7/15/24 9:26 AM, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
We have found that a dir (containing mostly home directories) with roughly
one and a half million files, took too much time to be backud up; it is not
a problem of backup media, also with spooling it took hours to prepare a
spool.
There's some strategy i
We have found that a dir (containing mostly home directories) with roughly
one and a half million files, took too much time to be backud up; it is not
a problem of backup media, also with spooling it took hours to prepare a
spool.
There's some strategy i can accomplish to reduce backup time (bac
36 matches
Mail list logo
