On Mon, Sep 30, 2024, at 10:48 AM, Marco Gaiarin wrote: > Mandi! Dan Langille > In chel di` si favelave... > >> From >> https://dan.langille.org/2023/12/24/backing-up-freebsd-with-bacula-via-zfs-snapshot/ >> : > > I'm still doing some experimentation on this, indeed. > > >> It doesn't all run as incrementals. If the list of DATASETS (see above URL) >> does not change, the fileset does not change. > > OK, but if mountpoint change, so change root path, so... how can bacula do > incrementals, if all path are different?! > > So. > I can use script for the list of path to backup; i can use 'Ignore > FileSet Changes = yes' > (but if i use script i think it is not needed...) but how can bacula do > incrementals?
Bacula will just do it. Nothing special required. >> Oh wait, I think I realize something. The snapshots do not have to be >> explicitly mounted to be available for backup (at least on FreeBSD). > > Never minded about that. Probably you can mount a snapshot with > '-o mountpoint=...'. But now i'm curious... > > >> Is this the problem you are trying to solve? mounting the snapshot to back >> it up? > > Yes. But i need incrementals too. ;-) Incremental are based on the mtime of the file, not having an older version of the file mounted. The script will work for incrementals. And it has nothing to do with having a snapshot mounted. Perhaps you need to explain more about this requirement. It sounds like you may be assuming something which is not required. -- Dan Langille d...@langille.org _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
