[Bacula-users] concurrent backup

2014-12-10 Thread Danixu86
For a Tape the recomended Job number is only one, because if you run more than one you're interleaving data between jobs and restore takes longer (and i think that database size is bigger too). You can try to use Spooling, but i can't help you with that because i'm starting to configure spooling

[Bacula-users] concurrent backup

2014-12-10 Thread More, Ankush
Hello, We have Bacula 7.0.4 on CentOs. How many maximum number of concurrent backup can be fire on tape drive? Is there anylimits? On BAT (GUI) I see only 10 jobs are running and rest show as "Created not yet running" in job status. I want to fire 50 jobs at time, what parameter need to change an

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent backup to multiple disk volumes

2010-03-01 Thread Josh Fisher
On 3/1/2010 1:24 PM, Stan Meier wrote: > Hi there, > > I just noticed that (for disk backups) by > > 1. (director) specifying multiple "Device = " lines in the "Storage" section > that > is referenced by a given (single!) Pool and > 2. (storage daemon) setting "Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 1" pe

[Bacula-users] Concurrent backup to multiple disk volumes

2010-03-01 Thread Stan Meier
Hi there, I just noticed that (for disk backups) by 1. (director) specifying multiple "Device = " lines in the "Storage" section that is referenced by a given (single!) Pool and 2. (storage daemon) setting "Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 1" per device Bacula does perform a true parallel backup -

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent backup jobs in an autochager with two drives

2007-01-08 Thread Alan Brown
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, John Drescher wrote: > I believe if you want to use both drives at the same time you have to > use more than one pool because the second job will want to use the > tape that is in the first drive and because it can't unload the tape > from the first drive it will wait till the

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent backup jobs in an autochager with two drives

2007-01-08 Thread John Drescher
> I have good the bacula-fd, bacula-sd and bacula-dir files, but I only > have one pool every night. Need I more than one pool for have twho > concurrent backup jobs in an autochager with two drives? > I believe if you want to use both drives at the same time you have to use more than one pool beca

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent backup jobs in an autochager with two drives

2007-01-08 Thread Pedro Sepúlveda
John Drescher escribió: >> Is it possible to configure bacula to use both of these autochangers >> with 2 concurrent backup jobs? >> > Yes it is. Have you set Maximum Concurrent Jobs in the director, the > filedaemon and the storage daemon? Also are you using tapes from more > than one pool? > > ba

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent backup jobs in an autochager with two drives

2006-12-21 Thread Per Andreas Buer
Pedro Sepúlveda wrote: Hi all. I have an autochanger: .. with two drives: Good for you! :-) (..) runnin in a single host, Is it possible to configure bacula to use both of these autochangers with 2 concurrent backup jobs? Yes. If you look at http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Aut

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent backup jobs in an autochager with two drives

2006-12-21 Thread John Drescher
> Is it possible to configure bacula to use both of these autochangers > with 2 concurrent backup jobs? > Yes it is. Have you set Maximum Concurrent Jobs in the director, the filedaemon and the storage daemon? Also are you using tapes from more than one pool? bacula-dir == Director { ..

[Bacula-users] Concurrent backup jobs in an autochager with two drives

2006-12-21 Thread Pedro Sepúlveda
Hi all. I have an autochanger: Autochanger { Name = STK-L40 Device = Drive-0,Drive-1 Changer Command = "/bacula/etc/mtx-changer %c %o %S %a %d" Changer Device = /dev/sg2 } with two drives: Device { Name = Drive-0 Drive Index = 0 Media Type = Ultrium2 Archive Device = /dev/n

[Bacula-users] concurrent Backup for one job

2006-05-16 Thread Gerald Nowitzky
Hello! I have a question concerning enabling concurrent backup for only one job: (a) I have several backup jobs backing up servers connected via a GBit LAN. These backups can go directly to tape, no spooling, one after the other. I don't want any concurrency between these backup jobs (b) I h