On 2/3/2011 9:05 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 02/03/11 20:19, Randy Katz wrote:
>> I am happy to present this case to the list at this point in time!
>>
>> My director does not have the correct disk capacities and must be moved
>> to a new physical
>> machine in order to be able to complete the
On 02/03/11 20:19, Randy Katz wrote:
> I am happy to present this case to the list at this point in time!
>
> My director does not have the correct disk capacities and must be moved
> to a new physical
> machine in order to be able to complete the cycle(s) at hand. The
> Storage Devices are all
On 2/3/2011 8:49 PM, Randy Katz wrote:
> On 2/3/2011 5:19 PM, Randy Katz wrote:
>> I am happy to present this case to the list at this point in time!
>>
>> My director does not have the correct disk capacities and must be moved
>> to a new physical
>> machine in order to be able to complete the cyc
On 2/3/2011 5:19 PM, Randy Katz wrote:
> I am happy to present this case to the list at this point in time!
>
> My director does not have the correct disk capacities and must be moved
> to a new physical
> machine in order to be able to complete the cycle(s) at hand. The
> Storage Devices are all
>
I am happy to present this case to the list at this point in time!
My director does not have the correct disk capacities and must be moved
to a new physical
machine in order to be able to complete the cycle(s) at hand. The
Storage Devices are all
disk based.
What would be the best procedure/pra
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Jeremiah D. Jester
wrote:
> John,
>
> When I try to 'mount' the volume again to load the requested tape I get the
> following error: "3001 OK mount requested. Specified slot ignored.
> Device="Drive1" (/dev/nst0)". Then I get several messages in the console
> as
John,
When I try to 'mount' the volume again to load the requested tape I get the
following error: "3001 OK mount requested. Specified slot ignored.
Device="Drive1" (/dev/nst0)". Then I get several messages in the console asking
me to 'mount' the volume I just mounted (located in slot 12, volu
> On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:37:46 +, Alan Brown said:
>
> Martin Simmons wrote:
>
> > I never found release to be useful on FreeBSD, because it leaves /dev/nsaX
> > open.
>
> It's very useful on a changer - it allows you to get Used/Full tapes out
> of drives and into magazines where the
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:32:40 -0200, Rodrigo Renie Braga said:
>
> 2011/2/3 Phil Stracchino
>
> > On 02/03/11 10:53, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote:
> > > Humm, very interesting... So, since I have three Pools for each
> > > Incremental, Differential and Full with different retention Volume
> > >
On Thu, February 3, 2011 7:40 am, Ronny Seffner wrote:
>> Yes, please read the documentation on scripts. :)
> I'll do so. Please provide an link because I can't find anything at
> bacula.org or /usr/share/doc describing variables like %c or %l (I guess
> %c
> = client name, %l = backup level).
R
> On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 07:52:10 -0500, Phil Stracchino said:
>
> Don't use Pool overrides in the Schedule. They are deprecated because
> they cannot be made to work properly in all cases.
That's true, but I hope the functionality is never removed. It is still
needed to make Full backups use
On 02/03/11 12:32, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote:
> OK, I know that I will have to review all my Retention Periods again to
> fix this problem... but is it a BUG in Bacula that it will prune every
> Job of a Client using the Retention Period from the Pool of the current
> Job running, even if all other
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
I am not entirely sure if you hit this or a bacua mounting bug that
hits me about 1 time per 3 months.
>>>
>>> Are you using fibre?
>>>
>>
>> I am using Ultra Wide SCSI 3. And an exabyte magnum 224 2 drive 24
John Drescher wrote:
>>> I am not entirely sure if you hit this or a bacua mounting bug that
>>> hits me about 1 time per 3 months.
>> Are you using fibre?
>>
>
> I am using Ultra Wide SCSI 3. And an exabyte magnum 224 2 drive 24
> slot LTO2 autochanger with HP lto2 drives.
In that case try loadi
Martin Simmons wrote:
> I never found release to be useful on FreeBSD, because it leaves /dev/nsaX
> open.
It's very useful on a changer - it allows you to get Used/Full tapes out
of drives and into magazines where they can be swapped out.
On a standalone drive the primary use is to get a tap
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I would recommend:
>
> 1. Ask HP *exactly* what the tape alert means.
It means what it says.
> 2. Write a little program that you can put in the Bacula "unmount" script
> that
> explicitly unlocks the drive door, then use mt offline to eject the tape.
I've been trying t
2011/2/3 Phil Stracchino
> On 02/03/11 10:53, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote:
> > Humm, very interesting... So, since I have three Pools for each
> > Incremental, Differential and Full with different retention Volume
> > Retention periods, basically I'd need to create three Clients resources
> > for e
>> I am not entirely sure if you hit this or a bacua mounting bug that
>> hits me about 1 time per 3 months.
>
> Are you using fibre?
>
I am using Ultra Wide SCSI 3. And an exabyte magnum 224 2 drive 24
slot LTO2 autochanger with HP lto2 drives.
dev6 ~ # tapeinfo -f /dev/sg6
Product Type: Tape Dr
Am 03.02.2011 um 15:55 schrieb Win Htin:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Jan Lentfer
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:48:51 -0500, Win Htin
>> wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Looking at last evening's backup reports, I noticed 3 incremental
>>> jobs
>>> ran as full backups.
>>> Since those
John Drescher wrote:
> I am not entirely sure if you hit this or a bacua mounting bug that
> hits me about 1 time per 3 months.
Are you using fibre?
If so, how many connections to the fabric do you have from the -sd machine?
---
On 02/03/11 10:53, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote:
> Humm, very interesting... So, since I have three Pools for each
> Incremental, Differential and Full with different retention Volume
> Retention periods, basically I'd need to create three Clients resources
> for each of these Pools... right?
>
> How
Am 03.02.2011 um 14:30 schrieb Rodrigo Renie Braga:
>
> > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:03:13 -0200, Rodrigo Renie Braga said:
> >
> > Before 28-Jan, I had only ran 1 Incremental Backup, because I
> started the
> > backups for this Client at 26-Jan (which was a Full Backup).
> Hence, I
> > believe
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 04:40:58PM +0100, Richard Marnau wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:52:15PM +0100, Richard Marnau wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:21:35PM +0100, Richard Marnau wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:13:49 +0100, Richard Marnau said:
> > > > > > >
> > > >
Sorry, I'm resending my question because I think I send it directly to
Martin only...
> > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:03:13 -0200, Rodrigo Renie Braga said:
> >
> > Before 28-Jan, I had only ran 1 Incremental Backup, because I started the
> > backups for this Client at 26-Jan (which was a Full Back
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:52:15PM +0100, Richard Marnau wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:21:35PM +0100, Richard Marnau wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:13:49 +0100, Richard Marnau said:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. = Bscan the related archives ===
> > > > > >
> >
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:52:15PM +0100, Richard Marnau wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:21:35PM +0100, Richard Marnau wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:13:49 +0100, Richard Marnau said:
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. = Bscan the related archives ===
> > > > >
> > > > > bscan
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Jan Lentfer wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:48:51 -0500, Win Htin wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Looking at last evening's backup reports, I noticed 3 incremental jobs
>> ran as full backups.
>> Since those 3 jobs are not newly created client jobs I am a bit
>> perplexed
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:21:35PM +0100, Richard Marnau wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:13:49 +0100, Richard Marnau said:
> > > >
> > > > 2. = Bscan the related archives ===
> > > >
> > > > bscan -p -s -v -P -h localhost Backupserver -V
> > > Vol0039\|Vol0045\|Vol00
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:48:51 -0500, Win Htin wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Looking at last evening's backup reports, I noticed 3 incremental jobs
> ran as full backups.
> Since those 3 jobs are not newly created client jobs I am a bit
> perplexed with the sudden change.
Maybe your full backups where pru
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:21:35PM +0100, Richard Marnau wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:13:49 +0100, Richard Marnau said:
> > >
> > > 2. = Bscan the related archives ===
> > >
> > > bscan -p -s -v -P -h localhost Backupserver -V
> > Vol0039\|Vol0045\|Vol0094
> > >
> > >
> > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:13:49 +0100, Richard Marnau said:
> >
> > 2. = Bscan the related archives ===
> >
> > bscan -p -s -v -P -h localhost Backupserver -V
> Vol0039\|Vol0045\|Vol0094
> >
> > Records would have been added or updated in the catalog:
> > 3 Media
> >
Hi folks,
Looking at last evening's backup reports, I noticed 3 incremental jobs
ran as full backups.
Since those 3 jobs are not newly created client jobs I am a bit
perplexed with the sudden change.
Following is the beginning of the messages from one of the backups.
> > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:03:13 -0200, Rodrigo Renie Braga said:
> >
> > Before 28-Jan, I had only ran 1 Incremental Backup, because I started the
> > backups for this Client at 26-Jan (which was a Full Backup). Hence, I
> > believe that the Incremental Backup Pruned the Files From the Incremen
On 02/03/11 06:56, Ronny Seffner wrote:
> To add some more; I saw parameters like "Full Backup Pool" and "Differntial
> Backup Pool" for Job definition and also "Run = Full ..." or "Run =
> Differential ..." for scheduling.
Don't use Pool overrides in the Schedule. They are deprecated because
the
> Yes, please read the documentation on scripts. :)
I'll do so. Please provide an link because I can't find anything at
bacula.org or /usr/share/doc describing variables like %c or %l (I guess %c
= client name, %l = backup level).
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards
Ronny Seffner
--
On 2/3/2011 7:09 AM, Ronny Seffner wrote:
>> Just use the "(Full|Differential|Incremental) Backup Pool" options in a
>> *single* job definition to tell Bacula to put each level into a
>> different pool, then set the storage to use in the pool definitions.
>
> I found the same thing the same time. I
On 2/3/2011 6:56 AM, Ronny Seffner wrote:
> To add some more; I saw parameters like "Full Backup Pool" and "Differntial
> Backup Pool" for Job definition and also "Run = Full ..." or "Run =
> Differential ..." for scheduling.
>
> But how to difference the Storage->Device and RunBefore/AfterJob para
> Just use the "(Full|Differential|Incremental) Backup Pool" options in a
> *single* job definition to tell Bacula to put each level into a
> different pool, then set the storage to use in the pool definitions.
I found the same thing the same time. I've postet new matching quesitions
the samt time
On 2/3/2011 6:56 AM, Ronny Seffner wrote:
> To add some more; I saw parameters like "Full Backup Pool" and "Differntial
> Backup Pool" for Job definition and also "Run = Full ..." or "Run =
> Differential ..." for scheduling.
Yes:
Full Backup Pool = FullFile
Differential Backup Pool
To add some more; I saw parameters like "Full Backup Pool" and "Differntial
Backup Pool" for Job definition and also "Run = Full ..." or "Run =
Differential ..." for scheduling.
But how to difference the Storage->Device and RunBefore/AfterJob parameters
in such an only_on_job_definition_with_two_d
Am 03.02.2011 12:04, schrieb Ronny Seffner:
> Hi list,
>
> I've a machine containig 2 different devices which I'ld like to use for
> backup. An RDX drive for full backups and an LTO drive for the differntials.
>
> So I defined:
> Jobs : "full_Job" and "diff_Job"
> FileSets : only one for both job
> On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:46:28 -0500, Dan Langille said:
>
> On 2/2/2011 5:44 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> >> On 2/2/2011 5:35 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>
> Sure, when I want to unmount or unload a tape.
>
> >>> Did you do th
Hi list,
I've a machine containig 2 different devices which I'ld like to use for
backup. An RDX drive for full backups and an LTO drive for the differntials.
So I defined:
Jobs : "full_Job" and "diff_Job"
FileSets : only one for both jobs togehter called "data_FileSet"
Schedules : "data_full_Sche
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:13:49 +0100, Richard Marnau said:
>
> 2. = Bscan the related archives ===
>
> bscan -p -s -v -P -h localhost Backupserver -V Vol0039\|Vol0045\|Vol0094
>
> Records would have been added or updated in the catalog:
> 3 Media
> 3 Pool
>
Op 3/02/2011 10:46, Laxansh K. Adesara schreef:
Hi,
I have installed bacula-dir on ubuntu and bacula-client on window
machine and also configured it so I am able to connect bacula-dir from
bacula client machine form console and now I want to do backup by
using LTO 4 tape drive which is insta
Hi,
I have installed bacula-dir on ubuntu and bacula-client on window
machine and also configured it so I am able to connect bacula-dir from
bacula client machine form console and now I want to do backup by using
LTO 4 tape drive which is installed on window 2003 server and I have
already te
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:03:13 -0200, Rodrigo Renie Braga said:
>
> Before 28-Jan, I had only ran 1 Incremental Backup, because I started the
> backups for this Client at 26-Jan (which was a Full Backup). Hence, I
> believe that the Incremental Backup Pruned the Files From the Incremental
> Bac
On Thursday 03 February 2011 00.29:31 Alan Brown wrote:
> On 02/02/11 22:16, Jeremiah D. Jester wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Frequently, bacula jobs stall on a 'waiting for a mount request'.
> > However, when I do mount the requested tape, it still doesn't run.
> > Wondering what I'm doing wrong here.
48 matches
Mail list logo
