Hi Thomas,
I can resolve/ping 'server' no problem.
iptables -L -n returns:
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source
> -Original Message-
> From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 12:22 PM
> To: Dean Hall
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] problem connecting to correct NIC on SD
>
> 2010/5/7 Dean Hall :
> > Bacula 5.0.1
> >
> > B
2010/5/7 Dean Hall :
> Bacula 5.0.1
>
> Bacula Server is multihomed. One network is fast, the other is slow. Some
> clients are single homed on the slow network. Some are dual homed with fast
> and slow networks. On the dual homed clients I'm trying to use the fast
> network for backup.
>
>
>
>
Bacula 5.0.1
Bacula Server is multihomed. One network is fast, the other is slow.
Some clients are single homed on the slow network. Some are dual homed
with fast and slow networks. On the dual homed clients I'm trying to
use the fast network for backup.
My client configs in the bacula-dir
Hi,
we are still running our Director on Bacula 2 and would like to update
to 5. However, we have some old AIX Boxes (4.3.3) that are still running
Bacula 1.36.3 (which I compiled w/o any problems many years ago).
However, now I'm stuch with alloca :-(
I tried both with gcc (3.0.1; I used gcc
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:25:57 +0200, Martin Simmons
wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:15:35 +0200, Foo said:
>
>> Is Bacula 2.4.4 dir/sd compatible with a newer database layout (11, 12,
>> whatever?) or do I need to update the dir/sd executables at the same
>> time?
>
> They are incompatible so y
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:49:06 +0200, Craig Ringer
wrote:
> Win7 and win2k8 offer an excellent built-in image backup system that
> makes proper use of VSS to get a consistent copy,
We have some W2K8 servers running here but not backing them up yet (just
upgraded Bacula from 2.4.3 to 3.0.3, cli
2010/5/7 Bill Hyde :
>
>
> Good morning,
>
> I am a very novice bacula user, so please bear with me. Yesterday morning I
> set out to do my usual check and rotate tapes. However, Bacula was
> unresponsive. Here is some information- *...@version
>
> Version: 2.4.4 (28 December 2008) x86_64-unknow
Good morning,
I am a very novice bacula user, so please bear with me. Yesterday
morning I set out to do my usual check and rotate tapes. However,
Bacula was unresponsive. Here is some information- *...@version
Version: 2.4.4 (28 December 2008) x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu redhat
*status
St
The problem had nothing to do with the scratch pool. That was just
coincidence because this pool was in the job definition for the copy job.
My first thought was to simply write any pool with a "Next Pool" directive
in the job definition and overwrite this in the schedule. That worked fine
for o
On Thu, 06 May 2010, Steve Polyack wrote:
> These are certainly good points. My thought is just that instead of
> breaking out of bconsole to perform these tasks can be cumbersome.
> Personally, I feel that it's something that I'd use a lot, simply to
> prevent me from constantly breaking in
> Hi folks,
> sorry if this is the wrong list, but maybe you can help me out anyway:
> Is it possible to assign labels to db instances in bacula-web? Right
> now, whenever I use something besides [.DATABASEn], php barfs and I
> don't get any results.
> Thanks much in advance,
> Uwe
Hi
On 06/05/10 15:03, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 05/06/10 02:57, Vlamsdoem wrote:
>
>> On 05/05/10 15:12, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/05/10 08:38, John Drescher wrote:
>>>
>>>
> Sorry my servers are on gigabit links.
> How do you come to 9MB/s with a 100Mb link, is i
13 matches
Mail list logo
