On 06/05/10 15:03, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 05/06/10 02:57, Vlamsdoem wrote: > >> On 05/05/10 15:12, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> >>> On 05/05/10 08:38, John Drescher wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> Sorry my servers are on gigabit links. >>>>> How do you come to 9MB/s with a 100Mb link, is it not equals to 12,5 MB/s? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Overhead. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> If it's correct on a gigabit link I would have a rate transfer of 90MB/s >>>>> >>>>> >>>> You will probably get less than that if you do not use jumbo frames. >>>> >>>> >>>> >> I did an throughput test with iperf between 2 servers on a gigabit link >> and it results in a 940Mb/s transfer rate . >> You tell me that transfer rate will be less than 90MB/s, is there so >> much overhead in the application layer? >> > It really varies. I routinely get 95Mbit real-world throughput across > my 100Mbit network; I know other people using different hardware or > different configurations who've never seen 90Mbit. Gigabit is the same > way. If you're getting 940Mbit throughput you're doing well, but > remember that actual application throughput may not hit that. > > > Ok with all this information I think I'll try with the sata hard disks. They seems fast enough to achieve everthing in time. Thanks to everbody who helped me on this thread.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
