On 11/10/06, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
pedro moreno wrote:> On 11/10/06, Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE->> Hash: SHA1>>
>> DAve wrote:>> > Good morning,>> > I'm not sure how to interpret the variation in rates. I don't think I>> > have a prob
On Friday 10 November 2006 21:57, Jaime Ventura wrote:
> Kern,
> This is not a bug i think. Bacula is not capable of doing what I
> want.
> Making it simple
> I want that ONLY messages regarding successful backups go to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], right?
Yes, you are right. The out
Ryan Parrish wrote:
> Has anyone written a vim syntax file for the bacula conf files to get
> some nice highlighting? I googled around and searched the list but
> came up blank, so i thought would ask before I attempted one for myself.
>
> --Ryan
I've not seen one, and I looked as well. It's b
Kern,
This is not a bug i think. Bacula is not capable of doing what I
want.
Making it simple
I want that ONLY messages regarding successful backups go to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], right?
When a job starts, bacula send the message : 10-Nov 17:37
bserver-dir: Start Backup JobId 1
Has anyone written a vim syntax file for the bacula conf files to get
some nice highlighting? I googled around and searched the list but
came up blank, so i thought would ask before I attempted one for myself.
--Ryan
-
U
On Friday 10 November 2006 18:20, Jonathan B Bayer wrote:
> Hello bacula-users,
>
> I've just finished modifying Bacula Web 1.2 to scale the output. I've
changed it from displaying bytes to displaying megabytes.
>
> If you're interested, let me know. The changes are in two files which I can
s
On Friday 10 November 2006 20:16, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 19:41 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > >
> > > Is a non-free version a big issue for you? I've always been a big fan
> > > of perl's dual-license approach which effectively removes the
> > > restrictions
> > > of the GPL
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 19:41 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >
> > Is a non-free version a big issue for you? I've always been a big fan
> > of perl's dual-license approach which effectively removes the
> > restrictions
> > of the GPL while allowing it to co-exist with GPL'd components. I think
> >
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:27:26 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
>
> Hello again Martin,
>
> I've changed the subject to be just slightly more readable than my orginal
> one :-)
>
> See below for the FSFE additions to my response:
>
> On Friday 10 November 2006 15:21, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Fr
On Friday 10 November 2006 19:04, Jaime Ventura wrote:
> Kern,
>I now understand whats happening and if I where more specific
> with the explanation maybe you would figure out what was happening to me.
>Here's what I wanted:
> If backup succides, then a messages would be
On Friday 10 November 2006 18:03, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 15:21 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > Yes, theoretically only the copyright holder(s) can change the license.
> > However, the FSFE agreement is a fiduciary relationship, which is entered
> > into for the purpose of
On Friday 10 November 2006 16:43, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Tuesday 31 October 2006 12:58, Mathew Brown wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I'd read several times that the FD encryption feature was not yet
> >> stable but this was several months ago. Would you now consider it
>
Kern,
I now understand whats happening and if I where more specific
with the explanation maybe you would figure out what was happening to me.
Here's what I wanted:
If backup succides, then a messages would be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If not, then a message woul
pedro moreno wrote:
> On 11/10/06, Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> DAve wrote:
>> > Good morning,
>> > I'm not sure how to interpret the variation in rates. I don't think I
>> > have a problem, though I would expect the backup
On 11/10/06, Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1DAve wrote:> Good morning,> I'm not sure how to interpret the variation in rates. I don't think I> have a problem, though I would expect the backups across the 1gb network
> to be far faster than th
On 11/10/06, Jonathan B Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello bacula-users,I've just finished modifying Bacula Web 1.2 to scale the output. I've changed it from displaying bytes to displaying megabytes.If you're interested, let me know. The changes are in two files which I can send you.
I am ver
Hello bacula-users,
I've just finished modifying Bacula Web 1.2 to scale the output. I've changed
it from displaying bytes to displaying megabytes.
If you're interested, let me know. The changes are in two files which I can
send you.
JBB
---
Superior solutions for small business, home offi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DAve wrote:
> Good morning,
> I'm not sure how to interpret the variation in rates. I don't think I
> have a problem, though I would expect the backups across the 1gb network
> to be far faster than they are. The backups across the 1gb network are
>
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 15:21 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Yes, theoretically only the copyright holder(s) can change the license.
> However, the FSFE agreement is a fiduciary relationship, which is entered
> into for the purpose of protecting and defending the copyright. They leave
> the proje
John Drescher wrote:
> On 11/10/06, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Good morning,
>>
>> I have a question concerning reported data transfer rates between the
>> clients and the storage servers. All the above servers are connected to
>> my NOC clients via a 1gb network. The servers are connect
On 11/10/06, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good morning,I have a question concerning reported data transfer rates between theclients and the storage servers. All the above servers are connected tomy NOC clients via a 1gb network. The servers are connected to several
other clients via 100mb networ
Good morning,
I have a question concerning reported data transfer rates between the
clients and the storage servers. All the above servers are connected to
my NOC clients via a 1gb network. The servers are connected to several
other clients via 100mb network and a 13mb VLAN.
Data rates for bac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 October 2006 12:58, Mathew Brown wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'd read several times that the FD encryption feature was not yet
>> stable but this was several months ago. Would you now consider it
>> stable enough f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd say there's a better than even chance that it does -- I don't see
why Bacula would care what the filesystem type is, considering the
operating system handles the read calls, doesn't it?
Mike Seda wrote:
> Hi All,
> Does bacula work for Solaris 10
Hello again Martin,
I've changed the subject to be just slightly more readable than my orginal
one :-)
See below for the FSFE additions to my response:
On Friday 10 November 2006 15:21, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Friday 10 November 2006 12:27, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 0
This is my version. Copyright (C) 2000-2005 Kern Sibbald.Version: 1.38.9 (02 May 2006) > Оригинално писмо >От: Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Относно: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula backup strategy >До: Kamen Medarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Изпратено на: Петък, 2006, Ноември 10 1
On Friday 10 November 2006 16:15, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken (and now I'm thinking I may have lost this stuff due
> to an old e-mail purge), someone has done some substantial work doing
> bare-metal restores on Solaris. I don't remember the gentleman's name,
> but I believe he po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
No one has answered this one, and I know PLENTY of people use software
compression and might know how it is and is not enabled.
Anyone care to give me some help?
- From the manual:
- ---
Bacula also has compression code, which is normally used only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If I'm not mistaken (and now I'm thinking I may have lost this stuff due
to an old e-mail purge), someone has done some substantial work doing
bare-metal restores on Solaris. I don't remember the gentleman's name,
but I believe he posted to the list.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You need to include your Bacula version -- I don't know why this escapes
so many people who write in to the list! :)
That said, I'm fairly sure Pool= is not supported in 1.38.x schedules.
Can anyone tell me if I'm right?
Kamen Medarski wrote:
>
> P
On Friday 10 November 2006 15:01, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 05:27, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > >
> > > The LICENSE will not be changed, only the copyright holder, so Bacula
will
> > > continue to be distributed under GPL version 2 + a few additions that
are
> > > specified in t
On 11/2/06, weyerma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi all,i have a prblem with my dds-4 drive.all tapes are only written to 20gb (uncompressed) and the tape fills.how can i turn the compression on, to fill all tapes up to 40gb ?Are you 100% sure that your data is compressible as you will not get any ex
Please help, i'm stuck with configuring schedule jobs. I'm try to implement configuration like this.2 fd clients.1st week in monday must be run Full backup, then in tuesday to sunday must be made Incremental, and those tapes must be available for restore for 1 week. For example named Full1 set.2n
On Friday 10 November 2006 12:27, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:18:52 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
> >
> > The LICENSE will not be changed, only the copyright holder, so Bacula will
> > continue to be distributed under GPL version 2 + a few additions that are
> > specified in
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 05:27, Martin Simmons wrote:
> >
> > The LICENSE will not be changed, only the copyright holder, so Bacula will
> > continue to be distributed under GPL version 2 + a few additions that are
> > specified in the LICENSE file. When GPL version 3 is released, we'll take
> >
On 11/10/06, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 03 November 2006 11:27, Jaap Stolk wrote:
> > I did some more reading and found that the differential backup only
> > looks at the file date/time, exactly like the incremental backup. so
> > this is no reason to use a differential bac
On Friday 10 November 2006 11:08, Jaime Ventura wrote:
> kern,
> thanks for your reply.
> I've commented the line "mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = all, !skipped" so
> that there were only only one "mail" directive.
> I still receive the error messages on [EMAIL PROTECTED] email
> account.
On Thursday 09 November 2006 17:50, Don MacArthur wrote:
> 1.
> The 'nix restore process is working. My process is as discussed
> earlier, install a base system with bacula and restore everything except
> - /sys /proc *and* /boot. I learned quite a bit about getting the drive
> configuration ri
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Rudolf Cejka wrote:
> Alan Brown wrote (2006/11/10):
I did not do /dev/zero because of hardware compression. I guess I could
>>> turn that off but isn't /dev/random 1 byte at a time??
>> It's fast enough on most systems.
>
> Really? My experience is that the speed of /dev
On Thursday 09 November 2006 07:50, Michael Brennen wrote:
>
> It worked. :)
>
> I installed Robert's 1.39.27 beta on a Windows 2k server, touched
> some files, archived and restored them, all without problems. PKI
> signatures were on. The sparse option was enabled, and compression
> was at
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 19:52, A Think Tank wrote:
>
> I am trying to go though the rescue procedures / preparation for
> Solaris, SunOS 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240, as directed
> by the documentation. I have a couple of errors with the command
> /usr/local/src/bacula-resc
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I suggest you use all means possible to complain to SuSE and Novell about this
> problem. Specifically, you can start by expressing your concern in the bug
> report. I find it totally unacceptable that a so called "serious" Linux OS
> provider would allo
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:48, Russell Sutherland wrote:
> There does not seem to be a port for Bacula for OpenBSD 4.0.
>
> I've tried building the package from source.
>
> After configuration, the "make" fails when trying to compile
> the stored code:
>
> ==>Entering directory /usr/local/
Alan Brown wrote (2006/11/10):
> >> I did not do /dev/zero because of hardware compression. I guess I could
> > turn that off but isn't /dev/random 1 byte at a time??
> It's fast enough on most systems.
Really? My experience is that the speed of /dev/random and /dev/urandom
in FreeBSD is far from
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:18:52 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
>
> The LICENSE will not be changed, only the copyright holder, so Bacula will
> continue to be distributed under GPL version 2 + a few additions that are
> specified in the LICENSE file. When GPL version 3 is released, we'll take a
Hi,
On 11/10/2006 10:00 AM, Robert Nelson wrote:
> Actually I've sent him a number of things to try as well as debug binaries
> but he never replied with the results of running them.
Oops, I'm quite sure I sent the results to you.
Admittedly, my mail provider seems to get blacklisted more and mor
Hi,
On 11/2/2006 4:04 PM, weyerma wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i have a prblem with my dds-4 drive.
> all tapes are only written to 20gb (uncompressed) and the tape fills.
> how can i turn the compression on, to fill all tapes up to 40gb ?
Do you want hardware- or software compression?
Arno
> my confi
kern,
thanks for your reply.
I've commented the line "mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = all, !skipped" so
that there were only only one "mail" directive.
I still receive the error messages on [EMAIL PROTECTED] email
account.(and also on [EMAIL PROTECTED] email account, but that's the expect
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, John Drescher wrote:
>> > Have you tried a test of the raw tape speed? When I first got mt lto-2
>> > library I did a few tests like the following
>> >
>> > time dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/nst0 bs=1G count=10
>> >
>> > and I got around 35MB/s.
>>
>> Try if=/dev/zero and if=/dev/ra
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 12:55, Jaime Ventura wrote:
> Hello
> This is my second email concerning this subject.
> Since no one answer me, and I've tested all possible ways (i think)
> should I consider this a bug?
> Thanks
>
>
> Message I sent before:
>
> I'm trying
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 23:55, Colby Silver wrote:
> I didn't find anything specific to my setup so I'm sending it here.
> Sorry if it's the wrong place.
This is a good place. Thanks. I've put it in the doc queue.
>
> This drive has worked great for a number backup/restores and happily
> p
Hello,
Note for Arno: 1.39.26+ does a better job of helping one diagnose these
problems by printing the full output from mtx when a failure occurs.
On Friday 10 November 2006 00:46, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/9/2006 7:25 AM, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> > I've gotten this one... I'd love
I’m using disk as backup media. A the moment I only
use one pool with label format set as follows: “Label Format =
"Full-${Year}-${Month:p/2/0/r}-${Day:p/2/0/r}-${Client}".
Every night bacula creates a new file, however although
volume retention is set to 2 days old files never get delet
Actually I've sent him a number of things to try as well as debug binaries
but he never replied with the results of running them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern
Sibbald
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:37 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.s
On 11/9/06, John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Try if=/dev/zero and if=/dev/random
> >
> > AB
Note that depending on the platform where you try,
/dev/urandom as a source might be faster than /dev/random.
("/dev/random blocks until more entropy can be obtained" says
e.g. the Solaris man p
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 10:38, Thomas Traeger wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I posted this before but as I was no member of bacula-users it did not
> (yet) go through the moderator filter.
>
> We are using bacula for around 9 months now and are so far very happy
> with it. 2 weeks ago we installe
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 01:46, Dan Langille wrote:
> What other projects have gone this way?
I have no idea and am not sure to find out ...
>
> Bacula users are most likely involved in other projects. Perhaps they
> can inquire and see how that transition went.
I'll ask FSFE what other p
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 03:06, Veronica Hill wrote:
> Hi Kern et al,
> i also want to take the time to thank you for some fantastic
> software! I haven't had any problems since i started using Bacula. i
> have only had to post to the mailing list twice due to the high qualit
On Friday 10 November 2006 00:32, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/9/2006 1:55 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:49:30 -0600
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Currently, the windows FD is running stable and reliable
On Thursday 09 November 2006 01:46, G. Armour Van Horn wrote:
> I hope whoever is maintaining the RPM build will eventually read this!
This doesn't have anything to do with the RPM. It is a PostgreSQL
installation/configuration issue. In a sense, it isn't even a Bacula issue.
If I am not mist
On Friday 03 November 2006 15:32, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> Bacula seem not to understand that today is week 44 of the year.
> It seemed to understand that last week was week 43, as it ran the
> job that was scheduled for that week. Here's the schedule that
> applies:
>
> Run = Level=Full Pool=Off
61 matches
Mail list logo
