Arno Lehmann schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/2/2006 9:00 AM, Christoph Litauer wrote:
>> Dear bacula users,
>>
>> I currently backup about 15 linux/windows servers to a LTO streamer. For
>> increased restore speed I want no parallel (interleaving) backups on the
>> tapes. So I set "Maximum Concurrent Jobs
Hi,
I was wondering how you remove database entires for clients that are no
longer being used. Currently I simply remove them from bacula-dir.conf
but I suspect the database entries still exist.
I'm getting a really bloated mysql bacula directory (currently nearly
1GB with 37 clients; used to
On 5 Jun 2006 at 12:30, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 5 Jun 2006 at 9:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > --- Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Dan Langille wrote:
> > >
> > > > How can a device have a mounted volume yet be waiting for media?
> > > >
On 5 Jun 2006 at 21:32, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> If you cannot build a statically linked FD, then you can still do a
> bare metal recovery by simply reloading your OS from CDs or whatever
> then using a pre-built dynamically linked Bacula FD to restore the
> user files and modified system files -- a
This email is interesting for a number of reasons. First, I never got the
original email, so something is flaky.
A statically linked SD should never be necessary for a bare metal recovery.
If you only have one machine, you must somehow reload the OS before
continuing and a Bacula Rescue disk
Hello,
On Monday 05 June 2006 15:42, Ian Levesque wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On a new installation of bacula, interfacing with three LTO2 drives
> through an ADIC Scalar 100 autochanger, I've come across the problem
> where multiple jobs are requesting the same volume on different drives.
> This used to
On Monday 05 June 2006 11:33, Tom Yates wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > I'm running on kernel-2.6.16-1.2122_FC5 and not seeing the problems you
> > are. However, I have only been running that system several days.
> >
> > I recommend the following things (obviously 2-4 are unnec
On 5 Jun 2006 at 9:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> --- Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > > How can a device have a mounted volume yet be waiting for media?
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > > I see this in my SD status:
> > >
>
--- Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > How can a device have a mounted volume yet be waiting for media?
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > I see this in my SD status:
> >
> > Device status:
> > Device "FileStorage" (/home/bacula/db) is not open o
Hi all,
I would like to install bacula client 1.36.1 on a system with Solaris 10
but I can't find some rpm or precompiled packages. On this Solaris
installation I've no compilers and I can't install compiler too. I would
like to install the 1.36.1 version because my bacula server is 1.36.1
Could so
On 5 Jun 2006 at 10:04, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > How can a device have a mounted volume yet be waiting for media?
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > I see this in my SD status:
> >
> > Device status:
> > Device "FileStorage" (/home/bacula/db) is not open or
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Dan Langille wrote:
> How can a device have a mounted volume yet be waiting for media?
>
> Any ideas?
>
> I see this in my SD status:
>
> Device status:
> Device "FileStorage" (/home/bacula/db) is not open or does not exist.
> Device "DLT" (/dev/nsa0) is mounted with Volume="DL
> I know that it must not be required, because bare metal recovery is
> possible on Solaris, and a statically compiled fd apparently isn't.
>
> That said, I know of no such problem on Linux and that will likely make
> your life a little bit easier. Can't 'yum' be used to find this RPM (not
> TOO fa
On 5 Jun 2006 at 9:40, Ambahunen Gebremariam wrote:
> I have the same issue. I usually cancel the job and run it again. That
> usually fixes it. Restarting the Storage daemon may not be a bad idea
> either.
Cancelling the job did not fix it. I've been thinking about
restarting the SD
--
D
Hello,
When I try to create the rescue cd from bacula-rescue-1.8.3 on Fedora core
5 using make or make copy-static-fd I get the following error:
Building root shared libaries...
./makebinaries: line 154: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `"`
./makebinaries: line 168: syntax err
I have the same issue. I usually cancel the job and run it again. That usually fixes it. Restarting the Storage daemon may not be a bad idea either. AmbexOn 6/5/06,
Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How can a device have a mounted volume yet be waiting for media?Any ideas?I see this in my SD
Thanks...I guess I have no choice but to install it all. AmbexOn 6/5/06, Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, Ambahunen Gebremariam wrote:> Okey...I installed the bacula-dir, bacula-sd, and bacula-fd. Now I would
> like to install only the bacula-sd on a machine that will
Hello,
Last night, the last job (backup of the catalog) produced the following
error.
I understand there is a problem in the database, related to the files of Volume
FILE_DAY_0004. No more.
Any help ?
05-Jun 03:26 backup-dir: Start Backup JobId 2964,
Job=catalog.2006-06-05_01.15.01
05-Jun 03:
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, Ambahunen Gebremariam wrote:
> Okey...I installed the bacula-dir, bacula-sd, and bacula-fd. Now I would
> like to install only the bacula-sd on a machine that will be used to store
> backups. How do I configure bacula with bacula-sd only?
Unless something has changed recently
How can a device have a mounted volume yet be waiting for media?
Any ideas?
I see this in my SD status:
Device status:
Device "FileStorage" (/home/bacula/db) is not open or does not exist.
Device "DLT" (/dev/nsa0) is mounted with Volume="DLT7000-JNY227"
Pool="Default"
Device is BLOCKED wait
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I recommend the following things (obviously 2-4 are unnecessary if 1 fixes
> the
> problem):
>
> 1. This still looks most like a kernel driver problem to me. Backing up to
> kernel-2.6.16-1.2111 would most likely clear up this point.
>
I've had a few kernel driver prob
Hi All,
On a new installation of bacula, interfacing with three LTO2 drives
through an ADIC Scalar 100 autochanger, I've come across the problem
where multiple jobs are requesting the same volume on different drives.
This used to be a problem prior to 1.38.6-b1 but I'm running 1.38.9
here. I doubt
I know that it must not be required, because bare metal recovery is
possible on Solaris, and a statically compiled fd apparently isn't.
That said, I know of no such problem on Linux and that will likely make
your life a little bit easier. Can't 'yum' be used to find this RPM (not
TOO familiar w
Removing the registry entry did not solve the problem. The error is
still occurring. It seems odd that it would be something with the
bacula client that would be causing the problem.
Any other ideas on how to fix it??
David Wilson
Network Security Engineer
PAETEC Communications, Inc.
-Orig
On Monday 05 June 2006 09:13, Tom Yates wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > This could be a problem with tapes, but the error message "Device or
> > resource busy" not a normal error message for tape error. It looks more
> > like some sort of driver problem (OS/Kernel driver, tape
> why do you not run a fill backup manually
> (eg. with bconsole , run etc...)
>
> willy
>
> On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 13:34 +0300, Silver Salonen wrote:
> > > On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Silver Salonen wrote:
> > >
> > > > I just "accidentally" deleted the monthly full backup made last night
(and
> > > >
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Silver Salonen wrote:
>
> > I just "accidentally" deleted the monthly full backup made last night (and
> > realized the mistake afterwards). Is there a way to upgrade the tonight's
> > incremental to full again?
>
> No need, it will realise theere's o preexisting full backup
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Silver Salonen wrote:
> I just "accidentally" deleted the monthly full backup made last night (and
> realized the mistake afterwards). Is there a way to upgrade the tonight's
> incremental to full again?
No need, it will realise theere's o preexisting full backup and upgrade
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I'm running on kernel-2.6.16-1.2122_FC5 and not seeing the problems you are.
> However, I have only been running that system several days.
>
> I recommend the following things (obviously 2-4 are unnecessary if 1
> fixes the problem):
>
> 1. This still loo
On Monday 05 June 2006 00:35, steven potvin wrote:
> hi
> i have installed bacula postgres rpm and have download the src.rpm of
> bacula and running the following command to install.
>
> rpmbuild --rebuild --define "build_fc4 1" --define "build_postgresql 1"
> --define "build_wxconsole 1" bacula
I believe there is a when parameter for the run console command.
That way you can say run last nights job at 7 PM and then go and play
golf without having to wait till everyone's gone.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
_
> Silver Salonen wrote:
>
> > I just "accidentally" deleted the monthly full backup made last night (and
> > realized the mistake afterwards). Is there a way to upgrade the tonight's
> > incremental to full again?
>
> You can automaticly re-run failed levels again. If it succesfully
> ran the b
Hi!
I just "accidentally" deleted the monthly full backup made last night (and
realized the mistake afterwards). Is there a way to upgrade the tonight's
incremental to full again?
I guess technically it means that does Bacula check for existence of the last
successful full backup?
If not, the
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> This could be a problem with tapes, but the error message "Device or
> resource busy" not a normal error message for tape error. It looks more
> like some sort of driver problem (OS/Kernel driver, tape drive firmware,
> SCSI controller, or Bacula).
i'v
34 matches
Mail list logo
