I know that it must not be required, because bare metal recovery is possible on Solaris, and a statically compiled fd apparently isn't.
That said, I know of no such problem on Linux and that will likely make your life a little bit easier. Can't 'yum' be used to find this RPM (not TOO familiar with FC). ---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/AST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Christopher wrote: > Hello, > > Is it actually a requirement to statically link the bacula-sd for a > successful bare-metal recovery? > > If it is I would really appreciate a link to get the glibc-static-devel > for glibc 2.4 on fedora core 5. > > After spending endless number of hours getting bimagemgr and successfully > burning to cdr to work, I find that the static version of glibc only > appears to exist for the development version of mandriva, though it is > possible that google did not pick it up. If compiling a static version > from source code that will not interfear with the already installed > version is possible perhaps someone will advise me. After downloading and > reading the INSTALL file for glibc I am not exactly sure that a truely > static version would be built. > > If I can not get this final obsitcal solved I will be forced yet again to > look for an alternative backup solution and abandon bacula. > > Regards > > Christopher Gregory > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
