Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning bug in 1.38.5?

2006-03-14 Thread Patrick Van der Veken
Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 22:18, Patrick Van der Veken wrote: > >> Ryan Novosielski wrote: >> >>> Are your JOBS set to expire soon enough to recycle the tape? There are >>> per-job retention periods to contend with. >>> >> Hi Ryan, >> >> I do not think this is re

[Bacula-users] CYGWIN and win32 Bacula.

2006-03-14 Thread Erik P. Olsen
I have been under the impression that Bacula as of version 1.34 no longer uses cygwin. However, bacula-fd.exe version 1.35.4 contains lots of cygwin references and when I try to make a back-up of files from windows 2000 I get error messages referring to cygwin files: 14-Mar 23:55 epo-dir: No prio

[Bacula-users] Console oddity

2006-03-14 Thread Brennon Church
Hello, This may be a known issue, or I may be missing something obvious, but I've come across an interesting problem while testing out the use of multiple consoles. I'm running Bacula 1.38.5 on a FreeBSD box. For the purposes of this test, I've set up two Windows systems (both on 1.38.4) wi

RE: [Bacula-users] (no subject)

2006-03-14 Thread Meidal, Knut
Will it work to explicitly restore by jobID, and do it in 2 different restore sessions, one for the latest full and one for all the incr after the latest full? I cannot test this myself, as I don't have a bacula environment at this time. Conceptual question: When Bacula get disk-based backups wo

[Bacula-users] (no subject)

2006-03-14 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Hello, I do full and differential backups on SLR100 tape, but incremental ones on DDS-3; when trying to restore a full set I get this: Warning, the JobIds that you selected refer to more than one MediaType. Restore is not possible. The MediaTypes used are: SLR100

Re: [Bacula-users] Trouble restoring linux-vserver files?

2006-03-14 Thread Ryan Novosielski
Are you trying to restore in-place? If so, try restoring someplace else and moving files into place. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning bug in 1.38.5?

2006-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 22:18, Patrick Van der Veken wrote: > Ryan Novosielski wrote: > > Are your JOBS set to expire soon enough to recycle the tape? There are > > per-job retention periods to contend with. > > Hi Ryan, > > I do not think this is relevant as the Bacula manual clearly states that

[Bacula-users] Trouble restoring linux-vserver files?

2006-03-14 Thread Marcel Gsteiger
Hi all I'm trying to use bacula for backup of my linux-vservers. These reside under a directory /vservers in their own ext3 filesystem. The /vservers directory is chmod (the chroot barrier) and either has "chattr +t" or "setattr --barrier" (depending on the linux-vserver version being used

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning bug in 1.38.5?

2006-03-14 Thread Patrick Van der Veken
Kern Sibbald wrote: On Tuesday 14 March 2006 18:35, Patrick Van der Veken wrote: Kern Sibbald wrote: On Tuesday 14 March 2006 15:34, Ryan Novosielski wrote: Wanted to chime in here because after a long period of time spent tinkering with Bacula

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning bug in 1.38.5?

2006-03-14 Thread Ryan Novosielski
I think it's possible that I disagree with the manual here with regard to what actually happens. This may be the problem. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \_

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning bug in 1.38.5?

2006-03-14 Thread Patrick Van der Veken
Ryan Novosielski wrote: Are your JOBS set to expire soon enough to recycle the tape? There are per-job retention periods to contend with. Hi Ryan, I do not think this is relevant as the Bacula manual clearly states that Bacula will always take the shortest of the all retention periods (Job, F

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning bug in 1.38.5?

2006-03-14 Thread Ryan Novosielski
Are your JOBS set to expire soon enough to recycle the tape? There are per-job retention periods to contend with. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ.

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning bug in 1.38.5?

2006-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 18:35, Patrick Van der Veken wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 15:34, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> Wanted to chime in here because after a long period of time spent > >> tinkering with Bacula, I have had my first successful automatic tape > >> rotati

[Bacula-users] Each week a new volume

2006-03-14 Thread AGYNAMIX Torsten Uhlmann
Hi all,   I have finally got my Bacula to work nicely. It backs up Full backups in ony disk file and incremental in another. I have set the Volume Use Duration to 6 days so that I get new files every week.   My question: Can I set the time-definition in the Pool that way that Bacula start n

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning bug in 1.38.5?

2006-03-14 Thread Patrick Van der Veken
Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 15:34, Ryan Novosielski wrote: >> Wanted to chime in here because after a long period of time spent >> tinkering with Bacula, I have had my first successful automatic tape >> rotation. I am running 1.38.5 at the moment, so I can say that tape >> recyc

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning bug in 1.38.5?

2006-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 15:34, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Wanted to chime in here because after a long period of time spent > tinkering with Bacula, I have had my first successful automatic tape > rotation. I am running 1.38.5 at the moment, so I can say that tape > recycling really does NOT appear

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning bug in 1.38.5?

2006-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:29, Moritz Bunkus wrote: > Hey, > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:38, Patrick Van der Veken wrote: > > Pruning the volume manually beforehand would be cumbersome > > solution. How do you determine the volume name which needs to be > > pruned (the $1 variable)? > > I'm not

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning bug in 1.38.5?

2006-03-14 Thread Ryan Novosielski
Wanted to chime in here because after a long period of time spent tinkering with Bacula, I have had my first successful automatic tape rotation. I am running 1.38.5 at the moment, so I can say that tape recycling really does NOT appear to be broken in 1.38.5 and if you are having a problem it i

Re: [Bacula-users] tape will not eject after finishing backup

2006-03-14 Thread Birger Blixt
On 2006-03-10 21:55, Lee, Raymond wrote: I set AlwaysOpen = yes for my devices per the Bacula documentation because I didn't want the drive to have to rewind and reposition everytime in between jobs. Setting AlwaysOpen = no does allow me to run the mt commands while the SD is running. However,

[Bacula-users] new volume recycled instead of appended to last used tape

2006-03-14 Thread Ralf Gross
Hi, I have two jobs that are using one pool. One job is the weekly full backup, the other is the BackupCatalog (250MB). Both jobs fit on 3 tapes, the complete pool consists of 6 tapes (2 full weekly backups). Volume Retention is 9 days, Volume Use Duration 24h. Last weekend the weekly full backup

[Bacula-users] bacula client connection errors

2006-03-14 Thread david robert
I am trying to check the status of clients using bconsole i am getting the following error   Select Client (File daemon) resource (1-10): 7Connecting to Client online2-fd at 172.14.60.82:9102Failed to connect to Client online-fd. and the messages are showing like below   14-Mar 11:49 backup01-

Re: [Bacula-users] Setting up Bacula

2006-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, I'm pleased to see this kind of request and encourage users/developers who are capable to accomplish this kind of work to respond directly. By helping such potential Bacula users, you will help spread the use of Bacula. Thanks On Tuesday 14 March 2006 04:45, Michael Friedman wrote: > W

[Bacula-users] Re: 0000557 bacula bug

2006-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Enrique, Please always copy the list as there are users who are interested in these things. On Monday 13 March 2006 09:29, Enrique de la Torre Gordaliza wrote: > Hi Kern, > > im trying to find the solution to this bug but I dont have enough > time... Yes, I understand. I have the s

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning bug in 1.38.5?

2006-03-14 Thread Moritz Bunkus
Hey, On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:38, Patrick Van der Veken wrote: > Pruning the volume manually beforehand would be cumbersome > solution. How do you determine the volume name which needs to be > pruned (the $1 variable)? I'm not really promoting pruning volumes manually ("manually" meaning "usi

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning bug in 1.38.5?

2006-03-14 Thread Rob de Jong
Attila Fülöp wrote: > I had a similar problem. I fixed it by running "status dir" > a couple of times in an admin job which runs before all other jobs. > Each call of "status dir" triggers one step of the recycling > algorithm. > > Excerpt form this script: > > # first force bacula to update volum

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning bug in 1.38.5?

2006-03-14 Thread Patrick Van der Veken
Moritz Bunkus wrote: > Hey, > > similar problem on my end. Debian packages 1.36.3. I have to recycle > tapes exactly twice before they're marked as 'purged'. The first run > takes quite some time, so it does its job, but it leaves the tapes as > 'full' or 'appendable'. The second run finishes inst

[Bacula-users] fd errors

2006-03-14 Thread david robert
Hi,   I have scheduled jobs yesterday night and i am getting the following error for most of my client machines.If i check the status some of the clients FD is connection and some of them or not.Can some one help me where i need to look in to this problem   *Console*.2006-03-14_08.47.11 Fatal e