On 10/6/2005 3:21 PM Joshua Kugler wrote:
On Thursday 06 October 2005 12:30, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
I suspect the answer to my questions is "no" but wanted to ask before I
give up on a batch of tapes created by BackupExec 8.x. Apparently,
BackupExec is so "stupid" that if it encounters an er
On Thursday 06 October 2005 12:30, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> I suspect the answer to my questions is "no" but wanted to ask before I
> give up on a batch of tapes created by BackupExec 8.x. Apparently,
> BackupExec is so "stupid" that if it encounters an error on any tape of
> a multiple tape volume
No, I never did try that. I may if I get time. Things are busy right now, so
now that it's working again, I'm good. :)
j- k-
On Thursday 06 October 2005 13:14, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Joshua Kugler wrote:
> > And yet more info (long, with lots of job reports).
> >
> > T
Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> I suspect the answer to my questions is "no" but wanted to ask before I
> give up on a batch of tapes created by BackupExec 8.x. Apparently,
> BackupExec is so "stupid" that if it encounters an error on any tape of
> a multiple tape volume set, it can't restore anything pas
Hi,
On 06.10.2005 22:30, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
I suspect the answer to my questions is "no"
I'm quite sure the answer is indded "no".
but wanted to ask before I
give up on a batch of tapes created by BackupExec 8.x. Apparently,
BackupExec is so "stupid" that if it encounters an error on a
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Joshua Kugler wrote:
And yet more info (long, with lots of job reports).
This error actually happened with *two* different tapes, and in both cases,
when they errored, they had the same "last volume bytes" value.
Have you tried running btape to see what it says?
---
I suspect the answer to my questions is "no" but wanted to ask before I
give up on a batch of tapes created by BackupExec 8.x. Apparently,
BackupExec is so "stupid" that if it encounters an error on any tape of
a multiple tape volume set, it can't restore anything past the error.
For example
Mr. Bush wrote:
> Phil,
>
> Thank you for the reply. Just another quick question
>
> On the remote storage server that I configure, do I have to also enable
> the director on this server or do I configure the server with the
> default settings, but never enable the director on the second ser
Hi,
On 06.10.2005 17:54, Tobias Kuckuck wrote:
Hello,
I had the following problem. After a tape error occured on one old tape,
I wanted to copy the tape contens to disk and from there to a new tape
using the same label than the damaged tape. Therefore I labeled the new
tape with btape.
Ho
Mr. Bush wrote:
> Is it possible to have a single director and multiple storage devices in
> various locations? We have two locations that we are currently backing
> up and our remote office only has a T1 -- backing up 6GB of data takes a
> lengthy period of time at night. What I was wondering is
Is it possible to have a single director and multiple storage devices in
various locations? We have two locations that we are currently backing up
and our remote office only has a T1 -- backing up 6GB of data takes a
lengthy period of time at night. What I was wondering is if we have a
direto
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:09:57AM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 October 2005 19:52, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 11:42:09AM +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> > > Ross Boylan wrote:
...
> > 2) single jobs. Priorities may influence which of several
> > simultaneously sch
Thank you for your responses. I seem to have it working now. I set
the default pool to Full so that if any jobs get upgraded they will
go in the correct pool. The main confusion, which I already mentioned
but will reiterate is/was:
1. I would have thought or hoped that somehow the pool cou
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 23:18, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> This is somewhat of a wild shot, but I recently saw a kernel bug fix
> against the aic7xxx drivers. If I remember right (I'm a bit hazy on this)
> there was a problem after writing 35GB of data.
According to lspcidrake (Mandrake's lspci ex
Hello,
I had the following problem. After a tape error occured on one old tape,
I wanted to copy the tape contens to disk and from there to a new tape
using the same label than the damaged tape. Therefore I labeled the new
tape with btape.
Copying was successfull, but after all, using readla
I have just purchased an Dell (HP) 8 tape Ultrium autoloader. The tapes
I am using are all brand new and are marked as 100GB uncompressed
capacity, but I am only getting 45 to 60GB per tape, i.e. 45-60% of the
rated uncompressed capacity. My previous tape system was an AIT1
autoloader and I w
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
On 06.10.2005 09:30, Sebastian Stark wrote:
On Thursday 06 October 2005 00:11, Arno Lehmann wrote:
(If you really want to use
external disks, use 2.5" drives for notebooks, and operate them with a
proper power supply.)
Why? Are 2.5" drives more shock-proof?
Hello,
On 06.10.2005 12:23, Achim Schmidt [Baclua] wrote:
^^
is this intentional? ;-)
Hi,
I've some problems to restore files I restored from windows client
(console & windows fd). the backup runs without any errors and problems.
but it seems i'm doing
Hello Nicolas,
thanks for your answer. I just tried to build wx-console with
bacula-1.37.40 in the same environment and it worked without any problems.
Tobias
Nicolas Boichat schrieb:
Hello,
You should use a stable version of wxGTK (e.g. 2.6.1), I think it should
fix the problem.
Best rega
Hello,
You should use a stable version of wxGTK (e.g. 2.6.1), I think it should
fix the problem.
Best regards,
Nicolas
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 09:23 +0200, Tobias Kuckuck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to Bacula and at first I want to say that this software is a
> nice piece of work. I just tried to
Hi,
I've some problems to restore files I restored from windows client
(console & windows fd). the backup runs without any errors and problems.
but it seems i'm doing something wrong with the restore.
If I try to restore by using the bconsole fpr windows, I get this message:
06-Oct 12:18 back
Josh,
On 06.10.2005 00:38, Joshua Kugler wrote:
OK, a little more info on this weird occurrence.
what you describe looks like a driver or hardware problem to me. Alhough
I can't be sure, I'm not able to imagine anything bacula-related leading
to such problems.
If you can reproduce the pro
Hello,
On 06.10.2005 09:30, Sebastian Stark wrote:
On Thursday 06 October 2005 00:11, Arno Lehmann wrote:
(If you really want to use
external disks, use 2.5" drives for notebooks, and operate them with a
proper power supply.)
Why? Are 2.5" drives more shock-proof?
In general, they are.
On Thursday 06 October 2005 00:11, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> (If you really want to use
> external disks, use 2.5" drives for notebooks, and operate them with a
> proper power supply.)
Why? Are 2.5" drives more shock-proof? I'm asking because I sometimes exchange
big datasets with people by sending
This is somewhat of a wild shot, but I recently saw a kernel bug fix against
the aic7xxx drivers. If I remember right (I'm a bit hazy on this) there was
a problem after writing 35GB of data.
On Thursday 06 October 2005 02:12, Joshua Kugler wrote:
> And yet more info (long, with lots of job repo
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 19:52, Ross Boylan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 11:42:09AM +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> > Ross Boylan wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > Given jobs scheduled at different times, does priority add anything to
> > > when they are run?
> >
> > If a higher priority job is running,
26 matches
Mail list logo
