Kern Sibbald wrote:
>On Thursday 04 August 2005 21:36, Martin Simmons wrote:
>
>
>>>On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 23:16:08 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>said:
>>>
>>>
>> Kern> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 19:31, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2005
Hi all,
Has anyone packaged up 1.37 for Debian (with funky VSS support)?
I guess I can do it myself - I just want to avoid duplication of effort.
Thanks,
Adrian Closeemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hitwise phone: +61 3 8530 2446
Level 7, 5
On Thursday 04 August 2005 21:36, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 23:16:08 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > said:
>
> Kern> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 19:31, Martin Simmons wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:43:16 +0200, Kern Sibbald
> >> > <[EMAIL PROT
On Thursday 04 August 2005 19:42, Theron Toomey wrote:
> Hello,
> I initially thought this problem was due to corruption in my database.
> However, the behavior seems to be caused by the SD, FD, and DIR sharing
> a working directory. When I assign the FD a different working-dir from
> the DIR/SD (e
On Thursday 04 August 2005 18:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am perfroming a restore and after the backup I write
> protected all the media (DLT-IV) now when I try to
> mount the second tape it complains that the filesystem
> is read only:
>
> 04-Aug 10:57 dicom-sd: Please mount Volume
> "TMImage
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 23:16:08 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Kern> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 19:31, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:43:16 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > said:
>>
Kern> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmo
Hello,
I initially thought this problem was due to corruption in my database.
However, the behavior seems to be caused by the SD, FD, and DIR sharing
a working directory. When I assign the FD a different working-dir from
the DIR/SD (e.g. WorkingDirectory = "/var/bacula/fd"), my restores work
p
Thanks Kern. I look forward to the release of 1.38.
-Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 11:32 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Ryan Colp
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Discrepancy in files expected during verif
I am perfroming a restore and after the backup I write
protected all the media (DLT-IV) now when I try to
mount the second tape it complains that the filesystem
is read only:
04-Aug 10:57 dicom-sd: Please mount Volume
"TMImages-0001" on Storage Device "DLT-IV" for Job
TMImagesRestore.2005-08-03_16
Hello,
Yes, I have had a lot of problems to get Bacula to count files correctly.
Despite what one may think, it is not so easy. Anyway, I *think* this is
fixed in 1.37.34
On Thursday 04 August 2005 18:12, Ryan Colp wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I am running Bacula 1.36.3 on Gentoo Linux, and it has b
On Thursday 04 August 2005 14:44, Joost Runsink wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think he won't find the file there since there is a problem with
> the group and owner tag.
>
> > > Cecilia-fd: -rwxrwxrwx 1 00 182742 2005-07-13
>
> Shouldn't there be a user and group name where the zero's are ?
Hi list,
I am running Bacula 1.36.3 on Gentoo Linux, and it has been working well
for some time. I received a verify error recently though, and it
appears to be a discrepancy in the number of files expected versus
number of files found on the tape.
>From the backup log:
FD Files Written:
Joost Runsink wrote:
> Repost
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm urgently looking for a solution. The restore of linux files is
> working oke. But restoring windows files to a location on the linux
> server won't work.
> I read in the "restoring on windows" about the permissions, but
> in that case I would get some
George R. Kasica wrote:
> Phil:
>
> Totally new questionI'm at the point of doing the various tape
> labels to build my pools here but was wondering how I do the
> following:
>
> Each cartridge has 1 cleaning tape in it and I want to let bacula know
> either:
>
> 1) Ideally this is a cleanin
@output filename
This is documented in the console chapter of the manual.
Thanks,
Chris
P.S. sorry about the reformatting
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Niemetz
> Sent: Thursday, 04 August, 2005 10:03
> To: Bacula users
> Subject: [Bacula-users] Output li
Title: Output list results to file
Is there a way to output the results of the list command to a file? While in the console (bconsole) I run the command list volumes (or pools, etc.) and get the results. I would like to redirect that output to a file for viewing/printing. Thanks,
Tony Nieme
Hello list !!!
if I want to backup mycatalog I get the following error from mysql:
/usr/bin/mysqldump: Error 2013: Lost connection to MySQL server during query
when dumping table `File` at row: 1984482
I start the script for dumping mysql with
RunBeforeJob = "/etc/bacula/make_catalog_backup b
Rico wrote:
>LHERBIER Lois wrote:
>
>
>>Hello everybody,
>>we replaced our old ARCServe with Bacula 2 weeks ago and everything is
>>running fine. For my first post here I really want to thank the
>>developpers because it is a pleasure to work with Bacula !
>>
>>I post here my question because I
Rico wrote:
LHERBIER Lois wrote:
Hello everybody,
we replaced our old ARCServe with Bacula 2 weeks ago and everything is
running fine. For my first post here I really want to thank the
developpers because it is a pleasure to work with Bacula !
I post here my question because I didn't find a
LHERBIER Lois wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> we replaced our old ARCServe with Bacula 2 weeks ago and everything is
> running fine. For my first post here I really want to thank the
> developpers because it is a pleasure to work with Bacula !
>
> I post here my question because I didn't find anything
I'm having one problem in restoring files to NTFS and other backuping
files from NTFS.
One occurs during the restore and the other occurs after the backup,
aparently the files are restored completely but the return status of the
job is ERROR.
I will post the error messages here and some clue
Hi !
I`m in the process of creating a initial bacula configuration for our
site and i want to check that i understood everything correctly.
For each Client that gets backed up i need:
bacula-client installed & configured on the client
client definition in bacula-dir.conf (unique for each clien
Hi,
I think he won't find the file there since there is a problem with
the group and owner tag.
> > Cecilia-fd: -rwxrwxrwx 1 00 182742 2005-07-13
Shouldn't there be a user and group name where the zero's are ?
Like bacula bacula ?
Having the same problem. When I do a "updated
I would just create an admin job that loads a cleaning tape and schedule
that job to run whenever you want a scheduled cleaning. You could also
manually run the job if you get soft errors after some large backup job or
something. Creating Admin jobs like this is covered in the manual online.
Tha
Hello,
In the future, you need to ask your questions on the bacula-users list.
I believe that if you look on the machine associated with Cecilia-fd
in /mnt/raid/restores, you will find the files. If you failed to mount the
file system, before doing the restore, then they will reside on the loc
On Thursday 04 August 2005 13:12, Alan Brown wrote:
> I'm not on the devel list.
>
> In terms of "next tapes", what is bacula's order of preference for using
> tapes?
It is complicated enough that I do not remember it. However, it is documented
in the manual, though it may be slightly out of dat
Hello,
is it possible to let bacula clean my tapedrive every sunday?
thanks for every answer.
regards,
Timo
--
---
DT Netsolution GmbH - Talaeckerstr. 30 - D-70437 Stuttgart
Tel: +49-711-849910-70 Fax: +49-711-84
On Thursday 04 August 2005 13:17, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm about to leave for some holidays... Hope you have a good summer, too
> (unless you're far south, then I hope you've got a nice winter), and I
> hope to find a much improved bacula 1.38 when I'm back... Have fun,
It is already
Repost
Hi,
I'm urgently looking for a solution. The restore of linux files is
working oke. But restoring windows files to a location on the linux
server won't work.
I read in the "restoring on windows" about the permissions, but
in that case I would get some files with the wrong permission. My
pr
HoliWHAT?
No free time until oct/nov, so please let this be the "last"
summer-holiday-email, yank thou! :)
Michael
PS: Have a nice trip, enjoy your stay ;^)
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 - 1:17pm, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm about to leave for some holidays... Hope you have a good summer, too
Hi all,
I'm about to leave for some holidays... Hope you have a good summer, too
(unless you're far south, then I hope you've got a nice winter), and I
hope to find a much improved bacula 1.38 when I'm back... Have fun,
Arno
--
IT-Service Lehmann[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arno Leh
Chris Lee wrote:
> Aren't the AutoPrune and VolumeRentention fields written to the volume when
> it is labelled? I seem to remember something in the manual about having to
> update your volumes if you change certain attributes regarding
> Pruning/Recycling/Retention.
Yes, they get written to the
Hi Chris,
This is a well known issue. Not all drives need to be offlined before an
unload.
If you look a few lines above your two ejects, you can see that there is
already a commented out command that would have solved your problem.
Look here:
# enable the following line if you need to eject the
Hello everybody,
we replaced our old ARCServe with Bacula 2 weeks ago and everything is
running fine. For my first post here I really want to thank the
developpers because it is a pleasure to work with Bacula !
I post here my question because I didn't find anything in the previous
posts or in the
HI,
i have one problem.
My server suddenly stoped backup files. In output message i see following:
03-Aug 23:58 vessel-dir: Created new FileSet record "shinka" 2005-08-03 23:58:21
03-Aug 23:58 vessel-dir: No prior Full backup Job record found.
03-Aug 23:58 vessel-dir: No prior or suitable Full bac
On Thursday 04 August 2005 07:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
>
> It looks like the database was indeed the problem.
> After examining the update script and the database I
> determined that the database was not fully updated
> because of the owner problem. The user bacula was not
> the owner so pe
36 matches
Mail list logo
