On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 22:10 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Robert, and sorry for not replying on this earlier:
Hi - no problems ;).
> * Robert Collins wrote on Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:03:42AM CEST:
> > There was discussion about getting version numbers from VCS recently;
>
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll throw a couple of suggestions for Autotools out there:
>
> 1) Interfacing with the Test Anything Protocol (TAP) (or maybe another
> test protocol?). Automake-generated Makefiles could be consumers of the
> protocol for third
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Stefano Lattarini
wrote:
> I don't know how the GSoC proposals are evaluated, but if reviewers tend
> to prefer more precise goals, extending the proposal in this way might
> not be a smart move. Maybe something like the following would be better?
>
> ``Interfacin
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Stefano Lattarini
wrote:
> ABSTRACT:
>
> The Test Anything Protocol (TAP) is a simple text-based protocol
> that allows communication between test scripts and a test harness.
...
> Now, in all honesty, I must say that I've chosen TAP not only for its
> objective
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> thanks for the feedback. I have a couple of questions:
>
> * Robert Collins wrote on Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:10:16AM CET:
>> TAP is an extremely simple protocol, and the extensions to it to
>&
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Stefano Lattarini
wrote:
> Hello Robert, and thanks for the feedback.
>
> On Sunday 20 March 2011, Robert Collins wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Stefano Lattarini
>> wrote:
>> > ABSTRACT:
>> >
>> > T
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Stefano Lattarini
> to its suboptimal documentation. So I'm going to ask: Robert, as
> the main proposer/supporter of the SubUnit protocol here, would you
> be willing and ready to help me out during my prospective work with
> GSoC, if I update
it is not sent to stdout,
the file would have to be copied to $tmpdepfile
and then edited with "tr" like the SGI ouput is.
Q1:
Is it possible to do this in the current depmod framework?
(I think it is, but I'm not sure what the issues from
other scripts like libtool are)
Q2:
How is $d
Tom:
>Robert> Q2:
>Robert> How is $depmode set?
>It is set externally before running depcomp. The correct setting for
>the compiler is determined by some autoconf magic.
Could you elaborate on this? or perhaps you could just point me to the
files?
I need to determine where a
n $(prefix) ?
--
Robert Boehne Software Engineer
Ricardo Software Chicago Technical Center
TEL: (630)789-0003 x. 238
FAX: (630)789-0127
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... gcc
> > checking dependency style of gcc... gcc
> >
> > Why is a ~/depcomp necessary in ~/ since I don't have any code there?
>
> Actually it is needed only there, and not in the source directories.
> You just need one copy of the script per tree. 'automa
e:
> >
> > pkginclude_HEADERS = config.h ...
> >
> > And use `#include ' in all other headers
> > that include it.
>
> Ah! Good call Alexandre! Robert, please ignore my last post.
> Installing config.h in /usr/local/include, for example, would be
> obvi
Assar Westerlund wrote:
>
> Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have a massive set of C++ libraries that use
> > CVS libtool, autoconf and automake to build and install.
> > Since users then need to have _all_ the header files
> > they also
o get a little help with this,
has anyone committed a supect patch that might do this?
Robert
--
Robert Boehne Software Engineer
Ricardo Software Chicago Technical Center
TEL: (630)789-0003 x. 238
FAX: (630)789-0127
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pp'
is in Makefile.am, am_progname_OBJECTS is empty.
Is this not supported by Automake, or is it a bug?
If Automake doesn't support $ in source file names, then
I would suggest that it isn't an important requirement for Libtool.
Robert Boehne Software Engineer
Ricardo
Thanks edward,
when I started looking into those, I read somewhere in the automake
pages, that the XFAIL results, are "expected fails", so only the
FAIL: pr87.test
FAIL: subdirbuiltsources.test
Still need to be looked at. Sorry for the slight misdirection.
Rob
- Original Message -
-- Original Message -
From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
> Thanks edward,
>
- Original Message -
From: "edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
Hi,
I've altered pr19.test to be (added VERBOSE=yes, and AC_EXEEXT &&
AC_OBJEXT). I've tried this test on both openBSD & windows. It's failing
on both (unaltered on openBSD as it doesn't have the .exe headache).
I'm quite happy to commit some time to troubleshooting this, if you folk
want to
est
===
1 of 1 tests failed
===
make[1]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/automake/tests'
make: *** [check-am] Error 2
- Original Message -
From: "edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EM
andre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 5:12 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: edward; Akim Demaille; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
>
>
> On Mar 12, 2001, "Robert Collins"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
point for things cygwin.
(And those two tests fail on cygwin as well)..
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 6:12 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: edward; Akim Demaille; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ok,
Right, I reset my automake dir to CVS no patches,
test log in testSubDir (running on cygwin 1.1.8-2)===
$ perl -pi.old -e 's/^\t\@/\t/g' Makefile
$ make distdir
chmod -R a+w ./am_lex_bug-0.1.1 >/dev/null 2>&1; rm -rf
./am_lex_bug-0.1.1
mkdir ./am_lex_bug-0.1.1
for file in Makefile.am Makef
Could someone point me to the file(s) that could
be the culprit(s)? I've not been able to track
this down as I'm not that familiar with the
entrails of Automake.
Thanks,
Rob
--
Robert Boehne Software Engineer
Ricardo Software Chicago Technical Center
TEL: (630)789-0003 x. 23
In a Makefile.am I have (abriged)
noinst_PROGRAMS = cf_gen
cfgen_SOURCES = cf_gen.c cf_gen_defines.h
cfgen_LDADD = ../lib/libmiscutil.a
but when I run automake I get
src/Makefile.am:22: invalid unused variable name: `cfgen_LDADD'
src/Makefile.am:20: invalid unused variable name: `cfgen_SOURCE
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: possible bug..
>
> | In a Makefile.am I have (abriged)
> |
I several warnings of the form :
src/Makefile.am:42: squid_SOURCES includes configure substitution
`@DNS_SOURCE@'
for a makefile.am containing (trimmed for clarity):
EXTRA_squid_SOURCES = dns.c dns_internal.c
squid_SOURCES = \
access_log.c acl.c asn.c auth_modules.c authenticate.c cache_cf.c
c
I haven't dug into automakes internals.. or I'd consider hacking this up
myself. It seems to me that a useful feature would be a DEFINES primary
that allows extra DEFINES on a per program basis.
i.e (drawing on a similar example in the documentation)
instead of
bin_PROGRAMS = etags ctags
ctags_SO
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: Feature request.
>
> | I haven't dug into automakes inter
The project I'm converting to automake uses AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(cfgaux).
The dependency cehcking code was looking for depend in the srcdir, not
the srcdir/cfgaux. I'm using a cvs version of autoconf - it's possible
they've changed the variables used...
Anyway, I've worked around it by dnl'ing the A
I hope I'm sending these problem reports to the right place...
Environment: cygwin. (Bleeding edge custom build).
I'm using automake CVS (updated around 2 hours ago).
The following makefile.am
==
bin_PROGRAMS = client
==
generates the following target list (abridged) in Makefile.in
==
client: $(
AC_EXEEXT was already present. I added AC_OBJEXT and ran
automake --foreign again, no change.
Rob
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: program target missing $(EXEEXT)
> >>>>> "Rob
Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Robert> Hello all! I've found a problem with conditional compilation
> Robert> in the CVS version of Automake that was introduced some time
> Ro
#" then there is no
definition for $(am_helldl_OBJECTS), but it is used throughout
Makefile.in. Does any of this set off alarm bells?
Robert
Robert Boehne wrote:
>
> Akim Demaille wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROT
Edward, I recall a discussion on your patch where it wasn't accepted -
which is why I brought the topic with a frest start.
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:00 AM
> To: Robert Collins; Akim Dema
Akim:
I think the breakage was introduced on March 5. I wasn't
able to narrow it down to any specific change though.
None of them seemed to me like they were candidates.
Robert
Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Boehne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 7:27 AM
S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I think I have it. It's a very stupid typo :(
>
>
>
>patchName: patch
> Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
Fixed. :) Thanks Akim!
Robert
--
Robert B
> -Original Message-
> From: edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 11:27 AM
> To: Robert Collins; Akim Demaille
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: program target missing $(EXEEXT)
>
>
> yep. enclosed is a patch which demons
> -Original Message-
> From: edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 12:47 PM
> To: Robert Collins; Akim Demaille
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: program target missing $(EXEEXT)
>
>
> here is the current situation as i
I assume this got overlooked? Or maybe I missed any reply...
Any suggestions as to what I'm doing wrong?
Rob
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 8:04 PM
Subject:
- Original Message -
From: "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: 2nd possibly silly question: XTRA_foo_SOURCES
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 09:20:14PM +1000,
- Original Message -
From: "edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 2:44 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: 2nd possibly silly question: XTRA_foo_SOURCES
> Robert,
>
> Tr
- Original Message -
From: "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 1:20 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: 2nd possibly silly question: XTRA_foo_SOURCES
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 12:19:44AM +1000, Rober
Yet another question from the newbie.
I have a number of built source (.hand .c) files that are built from
other soources/configure settings.
"make dist" is failing to find these files. (Some of them shouldn't be
included in the distribution, and some can be).
is there some way to exclude speci
I have three questions:
1) Based on a recent comment on this list,
I have
noinst_LIBRARIES = libfoo.a
lib_foo_a_SOURCES = foo/a.c foo/b.c foo/c.c
upon entering this particular directory, make dist does:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `foo.c', needed by `distdir'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving di
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: make dist and BUILT_SOURCES
> >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>
> Ro
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:46 PM
Subject: make dist and sources in subdirs
> I have three questions:
>
> 1) Based on a recent comment on this list,
> I ha
- Original Message -
From: "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: make dist and sources in subdirs
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 09:20:
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alexandre Oliva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: make dist and
The attached test csae demonstrates the problem. I don't think I'll have
time to step upto the coding plate, but I figure a the test might make
things easier ... :]
Rob
subobj5.test
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Tromey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: make dist and B
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 3:43 AM
Subject: Re: program target missing $(EXEEXT)
> >&
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Tromey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 3:25 AM
Subject: Re: 2nd possibly silly question: XTRA_foo_SOURCES
> >>>>&g
Changelog:
* distdir.am: Recurse into subdirs before handling files in the
current directory.
This patch reverses the order of subdir processing with current
directory files for the make dist target. This should allow make dist
with _SOURCES targets like foo/a.c or foo/bar/a.c. It' won't help
:
#:fec :
The problem is the appearance of 'ExprIntrp.tab.o:' on the second
line, this is intended to be stripped out, and is if the
sed command from depcomp is altered to
sed 's/^[^\.]*\.tab.o://'
But that, of course, is not the fix.
Could a sed guru suggest a fix for this part
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Tromey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: make dist and BUIL
in one of the leaf Makefile.am's I tried
libexec_PROGRAMS = smb_auth
smb_auth_CFLAGS
+= -DSAMBAPREFIX=\"/usr/local/samba\" -DHELPERSCRIPT=\"test.sh\"
(hoping that the goatbook comment re: automake 1.5 in the FAQ was based
on current CVS code :])
Now automake --foreign in the root of the source
perhaps other compilers that
use the same scheme(?). If we had source for the SGI preprocessor
we could find out for certain, but I doubt that '::' will appear
anywhere in its output.
I have attached a patch, made with the suggestions by Hari.
Unfortunately it wasn't made with cvs
or.
>
> I agree. That's all that matters. It probably doesn't generate "::"
> rules, or run on Windows, or anything like that.
>
> I haven't read the patch yet. But if someone else with write access
> thinks it is ok, that's good enough for me. It,
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Tromey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: nearly there... yet another question first
> >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Robert> Why doesn't it install compile in
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Tromey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: make dist and BUILT_SOURCES
> >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>
> >> Were they also listed in another foo_SOURCES variable
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Tromey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 6:36 AM
Subject: Re: 2nd possibly silly question: XTRA_foo_SOURCES
> >>>>&g
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Tromey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: make dist in subdirs before handling the current
directory
>
with this makefile.am:
===
EXTRA_LIBRARIES = libregex.a libdlmalloc.a
noinst_LIBRARIES = libmiscutil.a @LIBREGEX@ @LIBDLMALLOC@ libntlmauth.a
libmiscutil_a_SOURCES = rfc1123.c rfc1738.c rfc1035.c rfc2617.c util.c \
getfullhostname.c base64.c uudecode.c splay.c safe_inet_addr.c \
is
the user to add dependencies
without overriding the autogenerated ones.
Rob
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 6:04 PM
Subject:
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: problem: uninstall-am in makefile with no install targets
and non-
E
checking dependency style of g++... cp: /icarus/OCC/OCC/depcomp: No such
file or directory
/icarus/OCC/OCC/configure: ./depcomp: No such file or directory
none
--
Robert Boehne Software Engineer
Ricardo Software Chicago Technical Center
TEL: (630)789-0003 x. 238
FAX: (630)789-0127
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ing by configure. I don't understand how this is
supposed to work but I'm sure Akim knows.
Thanks,
Robert
.c.o:
source='$<' object='$@' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
depfile='$(DEPDIR)/$*.Po' tmpdepfile='$(DEPDIR)/$*.TPo'
@AMDEPBACK
Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> Please, edit depend2.am and replace
>
> if %?LIBTOOL?%
>
> endif %?LIBTOOL?%
>
> with
>
> if %?LIBTOOL%
>
> endif %?LIBTOOL%
>
> (no ? at the end). It should make it, right?
That fixed it! I've att
Ignore this, my email server is just very slow.
Robert
Robert Boehne wrote:
>
> Akim Demaille wrote:
> >
> > Please, edit depend2.am and replace
> >
> > if %?LIBTOOL?%
> >
> > endif %?LIBTOOL?%
> >
> > with
> >
> > if %?LIBTO
I haven't had a chance to look into the other issues in the pipeline
yet... but I realised I hadn't reported back clearly on the uninstall-am
thing: add ing the line you suggested does fix the problem.
Rob
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL
given the following
cf_gen_SOURCES = cf_gen.c defines.h
nodist_cf_gen_SOURCES = cf_gen_defines.h
BUILT_SOURCES = cf_gen_defines.h
I think cf_gen_defines.h should be one of the dependencies of
cf_gen.$(OBJEXT). It's not though in my generated Makefile here.
Suggestions?
Rob
- Original Message -
From: "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 2:40 AM
Subject: Re: target dependency bug
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:16:01AM +
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 1:53 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: Lars J. Aas; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: target dependency bug
>
>
> On Apr 16, 2001, "Robert Colli
x27;m testing this on my cygwin box with GNU make, automake CVS (as of
early week).
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 2:10 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: Lars J. Aas; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 2:20 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: Lars J. Aas; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: target dependency bug
>
>
> On Apr 17, 2001, "Robert Collins"
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 3:16 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: Lars J. Aas; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: target dependency bug
>
>
> On Apr 17, 2001, "Robert Colli
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alexandre Oliva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: problem: u
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Alexandre Oliva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: problem: uniti
Robert Boehne wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Current CVS sources of Automake leave @_am_quote@
> un-substituted in Makefile's causing make to fail
> if dependencies are requested.
> This is a recent problem, it's existed in CVS for
> only a few days (don't know e
7;m not sure if the maintainers would prefer a different
solution, so no patch is pending unless you ask.
Thanks!
Robert
from Makefile.in:
.c.o:
source='$<' object='$@' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
depfile='$(DEPDIR)/$*.Po' tmpdepfile='$(DEP
I know you love this bleeding edge feedback :]
What could cause errors like
Automake::register_language() called too early to check prototype at
/bin/automake line 742.
(which is
register_language ('name' => 'c',
'ansi' => '1',
'autodep' => '',
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: problem: multiple definitions
> >>>>> "Robert
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 9:35 AM
Subject: More CVS head errors
> I know you love this bleeding edge feedback :]
>
> What could cause errors like
> Automake::re
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: More CVS head errors
> >>>>> "Rob
I'm seeing
subdir/.dirstamp
subdir/*.o
left in each subdir that has objects built in it after make distclean
when subdirobjects is in use (CVS HEAD, not updated for a few days now).
(where subdir is a particular dir). (I'm working on make distcheck
again, the pass seems to have been a lucky chanc
Submitted to gnats
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Tromey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2001 1:36 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: make distclean with subdirobjects
>
>
> >>>>> "
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Apr 18, 2001, Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > .c.o:
> > source='$<' object='$@' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
> > depfile='$(DEPDIR)/$*.Po' tmpdepfile='$(DEPDIR)/$*.TPo&
CVS version of aclocal.m4 doesn't match CVS m4/depend.m4,
could that cause a problem?
Robert Boehne wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> There is a bit of a problem in CVS Automake (Today's) when
> --disable-dependency-tracking is specified to configure.
> If dependency track
@_am_quote@'
. $iter . '@_am_quote@' . "\n");
}
Where did @AMDEP_TRUE@ go?
--
Robert Boehne Software Engineer
Ricardo Software Chicago Technical Center
TEL: (630)789-0003 x. 238
FAX: (630)789-0127
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Boehne wrote:
>
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 18, 2001, Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > .c.o:
> > > source='$<' object='$@' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
> > >
Here is a patch that fixes the problems I've been winging about.
Part of the problem appears to be that @AMDEP_TRUE@ is
AC_SUBST'd when automake is generated from automake.in,
so I add a dummy variable and set it to '@AMDEP_TRUE@'
and subst that into automake.in.
Thanks,
ect it is. Sorry if I've been a bit
short, I'm running into a deadline on my project.
Thanks,
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Akim Demaille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 4:26 AM
To: Boehne, Robert
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alexandre Oliva
Subject:
t;" when dependency tracking
is off.
ChangeLog entry:
2001-04-25 Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* configure.in: Add _am_dep_true='@AMDEP_TRUE@' and AC_SUBST it.
* automake.in: (handle_dependencies) Replace @AMDEP_TRUE@ in
$output_rules with @_am_dep_true@
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Tromey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 6:42 AM
Subject: Re: target dependency bug
> >>>>> "Robert" ==
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Tromey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: More CVS head errors
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Tromey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: target dependency bug
> >>>>> "Robert" == R
Tom Tromey wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Robert> 2001-04-25 Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Robert> * configure.in: Add _am_dep_true='@AMDEP_TRUE@' and AC_SUBS
101 - 200 of 298 matches
Mail list logo
