Approved.
Thanks, Benoit
On 2/6/2025 6:32 PM, Sandy Ginoza wrote:
Hi Med, Benoit,
Med, thanks for catching those mistaken updates in the OLD text - they have been
reverted. With this update, we believe you approve the RFC for publication, so we
have noted your approval on the AUTH48 page
Hi Sandy,
Your proposal works for me.
Regards, Benoit
On 2/15/2025 12:54 AM, Sandy Ginoza wrote:
Hi Paul, Authors,
Thanks for checking in!
On Feb 10, 2025, at 1:54 PM, Aitken, Paul wrote:
1. Has IANA updated the registries from the RFC-to-be? It looks like updates
from section 4 have al
Dear IANA,
I reviewed https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9740-rfcdiff.html and
all changes look good.
On 2/18/2025 1:00 AM, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org wrote:
Authors,
While reviewing this document during AUTH48
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9740.html and other formats), please
r
Hi Alice,
On 2/19/2025 11:41 PM, Alice Russo wrote:
Benoit,
Thank you for replying to the questions. The document has been updated
accordingly; please see the follow-ups below. The revised files are here
(please refresh):
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9740.html
https://www.rfc-e
Hi Sabrina,
On 2/19/2025 1:40 AM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT wrote:
Hi Sandy, all,
Just following up on this. Are we removing the following text from the
Description field for 339 and 345?
For 339 informationElementDataType:
"(previously the 'informationElementDataType' registry)"
For 345 inform
Thank you Sabrina and Sandy,
All looks good to me.
Regards, Benoit
On 2/19/2025 11:00 PM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT wrote:
Hi Sandy, Paul, all,
We've updated the registry to reflect the changes in the diff and fixed the
typos, as noted by Paul (thank you for pointing these out):
https://www.i
Dear all,
I approve the document.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9740
Regards, Benoit
On 2/25/2025 11:52 PM, Alice Russo wrote:
Med,
Thank you for your reply. We have updated the document accordingly.
Re: Section 6.2.2
• I agree with the change in the first para of S6.2.2. However,
