> Oh, and forgot, would like to see it in EPEL for reasons that you will
likely see this week :-)
thank you very much
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:29 PM Scott McCarty wrote:
> Oh, and forgot, would like to see it in EPEL for reasons that you will
> likely see this week :-)
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2019
You are able to run docker-in-dind on gitlab, eg. from Fedora (done),
so I am sure podman-in-docker is not an impossibility. I haven't tried
it yet, and wanted to modify some of my builds, but haven't got the
time yet. try... ?
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 5:29 PM Scott McCarty wrote:
>
> Oh, and forgo
Oh, and forgot, would like to see it in EPEL for reasons that you will
likely see this week :-)
On Mon, May 6, 2019, 11:28 AM Scott McCarty wrote:
> Neal,
> Yeah, we will not port to RHEL (no ans at all), but to get moby-engine
> working on CentOS should be just stealing the Fedora spec file
Neal,
Yeah, we will not port to RHEL (no ans at all), but to get moby-engine
working on CentOS should be just stealing the Fedora spec file and doing a
little work...
On Mon, May 6, 2019, 10:57 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 4:52 AM Scott McCarty wrote:
> >
> > Muayyad & Neal
> SUSE has a variation of these patches for their docker package[1],
> maybe these could help with moby-engine?
I guess fedora's moby-engine .src.rpm would be just fine
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/moby-engine/tree/master
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 11:57 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Ma
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 4:52 AM Scott McCarty wrote:
>
> Muayyad & Neal,
> That makes perfect sense. Thank you for the feedback. It might sound
> crazy but I am keeping a list of every use case I can find and tracking our
> progress with podman.
>
> All of these use cases make sense (and I pl
Muayyad & Neal,
That makes perfect sense. Thank you for the feedback. It might sound
crazy but I am keeping a list of every use case I can find and tracking our
progress with podman.
All of these use cases make sense (and I plan on tracking them in my list
when I get back to a computer). If I
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 6:39 PM Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>
> > Is there some particular reason why you still want/need the Moby Engine
> > package?
>
> no, I just want to have that option (even if in a non default repo) for
> convenient and easy migration and switch between old scripts/ansible
> pl
I'm not suggesting moby-engine as an alternative to podman, but as an
alternative to +1.5 year old docker package
https://github.com/projectatomic/docker/commits/master
Why? because in OpenSooq.com (where I work) we have mixed environment
(centos and fedora),
and since fedora switched from docker
Muayyad,
Was there a specific use case that Podman was not meeting? Is there
some particular reason why you still want/need the Moby Engine package?
Best Regards
Scott M
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 8:30 AM Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> > BTW Have you tried out Podman
>
> of course, Podman is an aw
> BTW Have you tried out Podman
of course, Podman is an awesome peice of software
BTW: I'm the author of podman-compose and I'm writing an article about
buildah for fedora magazine
> I think this is up to a volunteer to take it on.
centos ships too old docker I'm not sure about compatibility
may
On 5/5/19 4:33 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems that fedora had shipped moby-engine,
> when can we ship it for centos/epel?
>
> if not in epel,link for that repo?
I think this is up to a volunteer to take it on.
BTW Have you tried out Podman
12 matches
Mail list logo
