On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 4:52 AM Scott McCarty <smcca...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Muayyad & Neal, > That makes perfect sense. Thank you for the feedback. It might sound > crazy but I am keeping a list of every use case I can find and tracking our > progress with podman. > > All of these use cases make sense (and I plan on tracking them in my list > when I get back to a computer). If I were to surmise, it sounds like many > people need some time to migrate certain use cases which have Docker specific > requirements. Hence, having the option of moby-engine around would make that > more convenient. > > Sounds like there are two short term goals: > > 1. Update podman in CentOS. I have to dig into this to see if it is tracking > g the version in RHEL properly. > 2. Add moby-engine to CentOS. This one might be interesting for for the same > reason, but admittedly it would be hard for me to push to dedicate Red Hat > people's time to package it. We would love a volunteer ;-) > > So much work and so little time. I wish I could just knock out all of these > use cases out on a weekend, but a 19 month old has put a dent in my free time > :-) >
The old patches for making docker work with RHEL entitlements would need to be ported, though. SUSE has a variation of these patches for their docker package[1], maybe these could help with moby-engine? [1]: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Virtualization:containers/docker -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
