> SUSE has a variation of these patches for their docker package[1], > maybe these could help with moby-engine?
I guess fedora's moby-engine .src.rpm would be just fine https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/moby-engine/tree/master On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 11:57 AM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 4:52 AM Scott McCarty <smcca...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Muayyad & Neal, > > That makes perfect sense. Thank you for the feedback. It might sound > crazy but I am keeping a list of every use case I can find and tracking our > progress with podman. > > > > All of these use cases make sense (and I plan on tracking them in my > list when I get back to a computer). If I were to surmise, it sounds like > many people need some time to migrate certain use cases which have Docker > specific requirements. Hence, having the option of moby-engine around would > make that more convenient. > > > > Sounds like there are two short term goals: > > > > 1. Update podman in CentOS. I have to dig into this to see if it is > tracking g the version in RHEL properly. > > 2. Add moby-engine to CentOS. This one might be interesting for for the > same reason, but admittedly it would be hard for me to push to dedicate Red > Hat people's time to package it. We would love a volunteer ;-) > > > > So much work and so little time. I wish I could just knock out all of > these use cases out on a weekend, but a 19 month old has put a dent in my > free time :-) > > > > The old patches for making docker work with RHEL entitlements would > need to be ported, though. > > SUSE has a variation of these patches for their docker package[1], > maybe these could help with moby-engine? > > [1]: > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Virtualization:containers/docker > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! >
