Oh, and forgot, would like to see it in EPEL for reasons that you will likely see this week :-)
On Mon, May 6, 2019, 11:28 AM Scott McCarty <smcca...@redhat.com> wrote: > Neal, > Yeah, we will not port to RHEL (no ans at all), but to get moby-engine > working on CentOS should be just stealing the Fedora spec file and doing a > little work... > > On Mon, May 6, 2019, 10:57 AM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 4:52 AM Scott McCarty <smcca...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > >> > Muayyad & Neal, >> > That makes perfect sense. Thank you for the feedback. It might >> sound crazy but I am keeping a list of every use case I can find and >> tracking our progress with podman. >> > >> > All of these use cases make sense (and I plan on tracking them in my >> list when I get back to a computer). If I were to surmise, it sounds like >> many people need some time to migrate certain use cases which have Docker >> specific requirements. Hence, having the option of moby-engine around would >> make that more convenient. >> > >> > Sounds like there are two short term goals: >> > >> > 1. Update podman in CentOS. I have to dig into this to see if it is >> tracking g the version in RHEL properly. >> > 2. Add moby-engine to CentOS. This one might be interesting for for the >> same reason, but admittedly it would be hard for me to push to dedicate Red >> Hat people's time to package it. We would love a volunteer ;-) >> > >> > So much work and so little time. I wish I could just knock out all of >> these use cases out on a weekend, but a 19 month old has put a dent in my >> free time :-) >> > >> >> The old patches for making docker work with RHEL entitlements would >> need to be ported, though. >> >> SUSE has a variation of these patches for their docker package[1], >> maybe these could help with moby-engine? >> >> [1]: >> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Virtualization:containers/docker >> >> >> -- >> 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! >> >
