Re: [atomic-devel] CentOS Atomic Host schedule

Thanks! That is a great point and I will definitely add use it! On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 16/11/16 23:46, Mark Dyer wrote: > > We're already on an older version of CentOS and since we are container > > based I'm trying to get us onto Atomic. > > > > > > On Wed,

Re: [atomic-devel] CentOS Atomic Host schedule

On 16/11/16 23:46, Mark Dyer wrote: > We're already on an older version of CentOS and since we are container > based I'm trying to get us onto Atomic. > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Jason Brooks > wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Mark Dyer

Re: [atomic-devel] CentOS Atomic Host schedule

We're already on an older version of CentOS and since we are container based I'm trying to get us onto Atomic. On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Mark Dyer wrote: > > It makes sense. Thanks. > > > > Is there a list anywhere of Atomic success

Re: [atomic-devel] CentOS Atomic Host schedule

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Mark Dyer wrote: > It makes sense. Thanks. > > Is there a list anywhere of Atomic success stories? I'm getting a little > push back along the lines of "it is too bleeding edge." Doesn't look like it > will be a show stopper for us, but if I could point to successfu

Re: [atomic-devel] CentOS Atomic Host schedule

It makes sense. Thanks. Is there a list anywhere of Atomic success stories? I'm getting a little push back along the lines of "it is too bleeding edge." Doesn't look like it will be a show stopper for us, but if I could point to successful deployments my life will be a little bit easier. In any c

Re: [atomic-devel] CentOS Atomic Host schedule

Hi Mark, On Mon, Nov 14, 2016, at 08:27 PM, Mark Dyer wrote: > I'm trying to justify moving our CentOS 6.6 based product to > Atomic Host. > > It looks like Atomic Host on CentOS is currently still in 'alpha'. There are two CentOS streams: - Core: A rebuild of "upstream" EL7 Atomic Host, just l