On 16/11/16 23:46, Mark Dyer wrote: > We're already on an older version of CentOS and since we are container > based I'm trying to get us onto Atomic. > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Jason Brooks <jbro...@redhat.com > <mailto:jbro...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Mark Dyer <m...@markyshouse.com > <mailto:m...@markyshouse.com>> wrote: > > It makes sense. Thanks. > > > > Is there a list anywhere of Atomic success stories? I'm getting a little > > push back along the lines of "it is too bleeding edge." Doesn't look > like it > > will be a show stopper for us, but if I could point to successful > > deployments my life will be a little bit easier. > > > > In any case thanks for getting back to me and also thanks again to Jason > > Brooks who contacted me directly. > > Ah, I forgot to include the list in those replies -- we don't have a > list of user stories that I'm aware of, that would be good to have for > sure. > > Red Hat sells a RHEL Atomic Host product, and those product folks > would likely have more information of the sort you're after. > > Also, everything you can do with an atomic host, you can do with a > regular centos or fedora host, just without the atomic system update > mechanism, so you could start in one place and fairly easily > transition to another. > > Jason > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Mark > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org > <mailto:walt...@verbum.org>> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Mark, > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016, at 08:27 PM, Mark Dyer wrote: > >> > >> I'm trying to justify moving our CentOS 6.6 based product to > Atomic Host. > >> > >> It looks like Atomic Host on CentOS is currently still in 'alpha'. > >> > >> > >> There are two CentOS streams: > >> > >> - Core: A rebuild of "upstream" EL7 Atomic Host, just like how > "CentOS" > >> is a rebuild of EL7 > >> - Alpha: > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Devel > <https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Devel> Where > >> we do development before things land in Core > >> > >> Does that make sense? As far as I'm aware the CentOS community > treats > >> the Core Atomic Host build is the same as CentOS core as far as > >> production. > >> > >> > > > >
The other thing that is worth noting is that the actual content on the CentOS Atomic Host is identical to the CentOS Linux payload ( by way of kernel, glibc, container tech stack etc ). What is different is how you deploy it, manage it and lifecycle it. Regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
