It makes sense. Thanks. Is there a list anywhere of Atomic success stories? I'm getting a little push back along the lines of "it is too bleeding edge." Doesn't look like it will be a show stopper for us, but if I could point to successful deployments my life will be a little bit easier.
In any case thanks for getting back to me and also thanks again to Jason Brooks who contacted me directly. Cheers, Mark On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016, at 08:27 PM, Mark Dyer wrote: > > I'm trying to justify moving our CentOS 6.6 based product to Atomic Host. > > It looks like Atomic Host on CentOS is currently still in 'alpha'. > > > There are two CentOS streams: > > - Core: A rebuild of "upstream" EL7 Atomic Host, just like how "CentOS" > is a rebuild of EL7 > - Alpha: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Devel > Where we do development before things land in Core > > Does that make sense? As far as I'm aware the CentOS community treats > the Core Atomic Host build is the same as CentOS core as far as production. > > >
