Thanks! That is a great point and I will definitely add use it! On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-li...@karan.org> wrote:
> On 16/11/16 23:46, Mark Dyer wrote: > > We're already on an older version of CentOS and since we are container > > based I'm trying to get us onto Atomic. > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Jason Brooks <jbro...@redhat.com > > <mailto:jbro...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Mark Dyer <m...@markyshouse.com > > <mailto:m...@markyshouse.com>> wrote: > > > It makes sense. Thanks. > > > > > > Is there a list anywhere of Atomic success stories? I'm getting a > little > > > push back along the lines of "it is too bleeding edge." Doesn't > look like it > > > will be a show stopper for us, but if I could point to successful > > > deployments my life will be a little bit easier. > > > > > > In any case thanks for getting back to me and also thanks again to > Jason > > > Brooks who contacted me directly. > > > > Ah, I forgot to include the list in those replies -- we don't have a > > list of user stories that I'm aware of, that would be good to have > for > > sure. > > > > Red Hat sells a RHEL Atomic Host product, and those product folks > > would likely have more information of the sort you're after. > > > > Also, everything you can do with an atomic host, you can do with a > > regular centos or fedora host, just without the atomic system update > > mechanism, so you could start in one place and fairly easily > > transition to another. > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org > > <mailto:walt...@verbum.org>> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi Mark, > > >> > > >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016, at 08:27 PM, Mark Dyer wrote: > > >> > > >> I'm trying to justify moving our CentOS 6.6 based product to > > Atomic Host. > > >> > > >> It looks like Atomic Host on CentOS is currently still in 'alpha'. > > >> > > >> > > >> There are two CentOS streams: > > >> > > >> - Core: A rebuild of "upstream" EL7 Atomic Host, just like how > > "CentOS" > > >> is a rebuild of EL7 > > >> - Alpha: > > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Devel > > <https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Devel> Where > > >> we do development before things land in Core > > >> > > >> Does that make sense? As far as I'm aware the CentOS community > > treats > > >> the Core Atomic Host build is the same as CentOS core as far as > > >> production. > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > The other thing that is worth noting is that the actual content on the > CentOS Atomic Host is identical to the CentOS Linux payload ( by way of > kernel, glibc, container tech stack etc ). What is different is how you > deploy it, manage it and lifecycle it. > > Regards > > -- > Karanbir Singh > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > >
