hi I need to get the ESI Maya 44 (not audiotrak, though their very similar) working on my favourite operating system (linux of course). Can anyone help me out? I got it for such a good deal I couldn't pass it by, but now I truly dislike having to actually use my win xp installation. I am even wil
PMG wrote:
> Hello, I have been having problems with the alsamixer. It seems usb
> devices like my Edirol UA-5 don't have mixer elements.
The UA-5 has hardware mixer controls that are not accessible by
software.
> Anyway, I've been having VERY VERY low input from microphones when
> recording. I
Hallo,
Zach Visagie hat gesagt: // Zach Visagie wrote:
> I need to get the ESI Maya 44 (not audiotrak, though their very
> similar)
They are the same devices. Really. It's just a different branding.
It should work plug and play if you blacklist the OSS driver (add
"audio" to /etc/hotplug/black
--- Clemens Ladisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PMG wrote:
> > Hello, I have been having problems with the
> alsamixer. It seems usb
> > devices like my Edirol UA-5 don't have mixer
> elements.
>
> The UA-5 has hardware mixer controls that are not
> accessible by
> software.
>
> > Anyway, I'v
Hallo,
Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Zach Visagie hat gesagt: // Zach Visagie wrote:
>
> > I need to get the ESI Maya 44 (not audiotrak, though their very
> > similar)
>
> They are the same devices. Really. It's just a different branding.
> It should work plug and pl
Hi all
I am puzzled... I do:
chrt -f -p 50 `pidof "IRQ 5"`
chrt -f 40 arecord -t wav -f cd -d 600 test.wav
and if there's accidentally an updatedb running in the background, I get
lots of "Overrun!!! (at least xxxms long)", where xxx can be hundreds of
milliseconds.
Software:
Debian Sarge (s
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:03:29PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> chrt -f -p 50 `pidof "IRQ 5"`
> chrt -f 40 arecord -t wav -f cd -d 600 test.wav
>
> and if there's accidentally an updatedb running in the background, I get
> lots of "Overrun!!! (at least xxxms long)", where xxx can be hun
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 21:03 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am puzzled... I do:
>
> chrt -f -p 50 `pidof "IRQ 5"`
> chrt -f 40 arecord -t wav -f cd -d 600 test.wav
>
That should Just Work - what happens if you leave the IRQs alone and
just try arecord?
Please post the conten
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, fons adriaensen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:03:29PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> > chrt -f -p 50 `pidof "IRQ 5"`
> > chrt -f 40 arecord -t wav -f cd -d 600 test.wav
> >
> > and if there's accidentally an updatedb running in the background, I get
> > lots o
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 21:19 +0100, fons adriaensen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:03:29PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> > chrt -f -p 50 `pidof "IRQ 5"`
> > chrt -f 40 arecord -t wav -f cd -d 600 test.wav
> >
> > and if there's accidentally an updatedb running in the background, I g
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 21:03 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I am puzzled... I do:
> >
> > chrt -f -p 50 `pidof "IRQ 5"`
> > chrt -f 40 arecord -t wav -f cd -d 600 test.wav
> >
>
> That should Just Work - what happens if you leave t
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:32:00PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> This is what "chrt -f 40 arecord" does, isn't it? SCHED_FIFO with static
> priority 40, should be enough...
Should be :-) Sorry, I overlooked the second command.
--
FA
---
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 21:57 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 21:03 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > I am puzzled... I do:
> > >
> > > chrt -f -p 50 `pidof "IRQ 5"`
> > > chrt -f 40 arecord -t wav -
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 21:57 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 21:03 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > Hi all
> > > >
> > > > I am puzzled... I do:
> > > >
> > > > chrt -
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 21:19 +0100, fons adriaensen wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:03:29PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >
> > > chrt -f -p 50 `pidof "IRQ 5"`
> > > chrt -f 40 arecord -t wav -f cd -d 600 test.wav
> > >
> > > and if there's ac
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 22:14 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 21:57 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 21:03 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 22:16 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> One doubt, though - setting SCHED_FIFO and raising the priority
> doesn't do
> mlock, can that be a problem? I do have 512MB RAM... No, after getting
> a
> couple of those overruns swap use is still 0.
Forget about SCHED_FIFO and
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 22:14 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >
> > Ok, I was running a rt-kernel right now, otherwise just started
>
> This is with all IRQ priorities left at the defaults?
Exactly.
> > arecord -t wav -f cd /tmp/test.wav
> >
> > as
All,
I am having trouble getting a Soundblaster live 24-bit to work. I have
built 1.0.11rc3 (drivers, libs, utils) on a 2.4.19 kernel running on a
very old Caldera system with limited updates (the card worked fine on my
debian/testing machine). (I don't have a choice on the system.) I had
to mo
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 22:30 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 22:14 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok, I was running a rt-kernel right now, otherwise just started
> >
> > This is with all IRQ priorities left
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 22:16 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > One doubt, though - setting SCHED_FIFO and raising the priority
> > doesn't do
> > mlock, can that be a problem? I do have 512MB RAM... No, after getting
> > a
> > couple of those overruns
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
> Try enabling latency tracing in the kernel config and see what you get
> in /proc/latency_trace.
This will take a while, compiling. And, sorry, it's rt16, not rt17.
> Is this a laptop?
No.
> Is ACPI enabled?
Yes. Should I disable it straight away? I gu
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 22:41 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> One more thing comes to mind. Lee, you would remember - there were
> some
> reports of "time ls" taking variable time under 2.6.15, unlike "time
> ls |
> cat" on LKML... Didn't read it too attentively then - was it a
> principle
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 22:41 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >
> > One more thing comes to mind. Lee, you would remember - there were
> > some
> > reports of "time ls" taking variable time under 2.6.15, unlike "time
> > ls |
> > cat" on LKML... Didn'
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 23:14 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 22:41 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > >
> > > One more thing comes to mind. Lee, you would remember - there were
> > > some
> > > reports of "time ls" takin
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
> Try enabling latency tracing in the kernel config and see what you get
> in /proc/latency_trace.
Ok, it failed - it stayed empty. I tried
echo 2 > /proc/sys/kernel/trace_enabled
gettimeofday(0,1)
gettimeofday(0,0)
still it stayed empty. Will look at it t
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 00:13 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
>
> > Try enabling latency tracing in the kernel config and see what you get
> > in /proc/latency_trace.
>
> Ok, it failed - it stayed empty. I tried
>
> echo 2 > /proc/sys/kernel/trace_enabl
Is it possible config .asoundrc with mono dmix pcm
So the following would play the wav file in only left speaker
aplay -D testpcm monofile.wav
and then config another pcm for the right speaker.
Any ideas about how can I do?
Best Regards
Halli
---
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 23:41 +, Haraldur Jóhannesson wrote:
> Is it possible config .asoundrc with mono dmix pcm
>
> So the following would play the wav file in only left speaker
> aplay -D testpcm monofile.wav
>
> and then config another pcm for the right speaker.
>
> Any ideas about how ca
Jim Gleason wrote:
> I am having trouble getting a Soundblaster live 24-bit to work. I have
> built 1.0.11rc3 (drivers, libs, utils) on a 2.4.19 kernel running on a
> very old Caldera system with limited updates (the card worked fine on my
> debian/testing machine). (I don't have a choice on the
30 matches
Mail list logo
