On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 23:14 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 22:41 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > 
> > > One more thing comes to mind. Lee, you would remember - there were
> > > some 
> > > reports of "time ls" taking variable time under 2.6.15, unlike "time
> > > ls | 
> > > cat" on LKML... Didn't read it too attentively then - was it a
> > > principle 
> > > problem of 2.6.15 or only specific PCs? In any case, mine has it too.
> > 
> > That has been broken forever - at least since the beginning of the 2.6
> > series, on every machine I have tried.  It might have been broken on 2.4
> > also.  It's not related to this problem.
> 
> Ok, good to know:-) Another shot in the dark - since about 2.6.9, i.e., 
> with all my sound-recording attempts, I've been forcing "lapic" on the 
> kernel command-line. And as a penalty was getting some "ERR:" counts in 
> /proc/interrupts. Now with 2.6.15 I don't force lapic. Could that make a 
> difference?

Only one way to find out...



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Alsa-user mailing list
Alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user

Reply via email to