Bug#1086645: dbus-test-runner: autopkgtest regression: test depends on obsolete package bustle

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 11-04-2025 15:19, Jeremy Bícha wrote: We have now uploaded bustle to Unstable. I didn't notice that bustle wasn't in Testing so I did another upload today. Please consider hinting bustle in faster since I'm not sure whether there are 5 days left before the Soft Freeze. Note that bustle i

Bug#1086645: dbus-test-runner: autopkgtest regression: test depends on obsolete package bustle

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 11-04-2025 15:19, Jeremy Bícha wrote: We have now uploaded bustle to Unstable. I didn't notice that bustle wasn't in Testing so I did another upload today. Please consider hinting bustle in faster since I'm not sure whether there are 5 days left before the Soft Freeze. Note that bustle i

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
debian-installer/-/blob/master/debian/control?ref_type=heads#L155 and https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/blob/master/build/config/x86.cfg?ref_type=heads#L124 Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
debian-installer/-/blob/master/debian/control?ref_type=heads#L155 and https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/blob/master/build/config/x86.cfg?ref_type=heads#L124 Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
debian-installer/-/blob/master/debian/control?ref_type=heads#L155 and https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/blob/master/build/config/x86.cfg?ref_type=heads#L124 Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1102724: RM: win32-loader -- RoQA; not considered worthwhile to maintain further

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
just removing win32-loader use in d-i and filling of this bug report? Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1102724: RM: win32-loader -- RoQA; not considered worthwhile to maintain further

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
just removing win32-loader use in d-i and filling of this bug report? Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 12-04-2025 12:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Paul Gevers (2025-04-12): Do you speak on behalf of all maintainers here? Do you want me to find out what needs to be done to remove win32-loader from trixie? I'm not aware of anyone wanting to keep win32-loader around, so yeah, looking

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 12-04-2025 12:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Paul Gevers (2025-04-12): Do you speak on behalf of all maintainers here? Do you want me to find out what needs to be done to remove win32-loader from trixie? I'm not aware of anyone wanting to keep win32-loader around, so yeah, looking

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 12-04-2025 12:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Paul Gevers (2025-04-12): Do you speak on behalf of all maintainers here? Do you want me to find out what needs to be done to remove win32-loader from trixie? I'm not aware of anyone wanting to keep win32-loader around, so yeah, looking

Bug#1102599: Is a self-contained upgrade considered large/disruptive? (was Re: Bug#1102599: rust-tonic: please upgrade to 0.13 with upcoming upgrade of rust-prost 0.13)

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
diffs don't look good. That's not really reviewable. So you better have a good explanation of why the new version is so much better than the current version in trixie. Otherwise consider this request as just too late. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 27-03-2025 19:57, Holger Wansing wrote: Am 27. März 2025 15:25:09 MEZ schrieb Paul Gevers : I've seen multiple times that win32-loader was mentioned during a stable point release IRC discussion and I am under the impression that "we" want to remove it at some point. I

Re: Is a self-contained upgrade considered large/disruptive? (was Re: Bug#1102599: rust-tonic: please upgrade to 0.13 with upcoming upgrade of rust-prost 0.13)

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
diffs don't look good. That's not really reviewable. So you better have a good explanation of why the new version is so much better than the current version in trixie. Otherwise consider this request as just too late. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 27-03-2025 19:57, Holger Wansing wrote: Am 27. März 2025 15:25:09 MEZ schrieb Paul Gevers : I've seen multiple times that win32-loader was mentioned during a stable point release IRC discussion and I am under the impression that "we" want to remove it at some point. I

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 27-03-2025 19:57, Holger Wansing wrote: Am 27. März 2025 15:25:09 MEZ schrieb Paul Gevers : I've seen multiple times that win32-loader was mentioned during a stable point release IRC discussion and I am under the impression that "we" want to remove it at some point. I

Bug#1102718: bacula: Translation debconf PO in french

2025-04-12 Thread Guillonneau Jean-Paul
under the same license as the bacula package. # Jean-Paul Guillonneau , 2025 msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: bacula\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: bac...@packages.debian.org\n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2024-11-18 20:33+0100\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 20

[valgrind] [Bug 390310] Output summaries in XML files

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390310 --- Comment #18 from Paul Floyd --- Created attachment 180193 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=180193&action=edit With updated expecteds Now clean on FreeBSD -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Re: testing migration for Essential packages

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 12-04-2025 10:58, Bastian Blank wrote: On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 09:56:02AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: What we can already do is ask packages that depend on Essential packages, to add a hint-testsuite-triggers [1] test. That way we would at least know which packages to test for. People

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Goyette
sc, va, blkno, nblk); } !DSPAM:67fa3180268605766628163! +-----+--+--+ | Paul Goyette (.sig) | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses:| | (Retired) | 1B11 1849 721C 56C8 F63A | p...@whooppee.com| | Software Developer | 6E2E 05FD

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Goyette
1957320007! +-+--+--+ | Paul Goyette (.sig) | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses:| | (Retired) | 1B11 1849 721C 56C8 F63A | p...@whooppee.com| | Software Developer | 6E2E 05FD 15CE 9F2D 5102 | pgoye...@netbsd.org | | & Ne

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
dency not in testing. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1102694: src:harlequin-odbc: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
ease reach out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=harlequin-odbc Current text from [2]: Migration status for harlequin-odbc (0.3.0-1 to 0.3.1-1): BLOCKED: Cannot migrate due to another item, which

Bug#1102696: src:petsc4py: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=petsc4py Current text from [2]: Migration status for petsc4py (3.22.3-1 to 3.22.4-1): BLOCKED: Cannot migrate due to another item, which is blocked (please c

Bug#1102697: src:sundials: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
ease reach out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=sundials Current text from [2]: Migration status for sundials (7.1.1+dfsg1-8 to 7.1.1+dfsg1-10): BLOCKED: Cannot migrate due to another item, which

Bug#1102697: src:sundials: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
ease reach out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=sundials Current text from [2]: Migration status for sundials (7.1.1+dfsg1-8 to 7.1.1+dfsg1-10): BLOCKED: Cannot migrate due to another item, which

Bug#1099499: requires pyarrow

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
dency not in testing. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1102696: src:petsc4py: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=petsc4py Current text from [2]: Migration status for petsc4py (3.22.3-1 to 3.22.4-1): BLOCKED: Cannot migrate due to another item, which is blocked (please c

Bug#1102697: src:sundials: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
ease reach out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=sundials Current text from [2]: Migration status for sundials (7.1.1+dfsg1-8 to 7.1.1+dfsg1-10): BLOCKED: Cannot migrate due to another item, which

Bug#1102695: src:harlequin-postgres: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
e process, please reach out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=harlequin-postgres Current text from [2]: Migration status for harlequin-postgres (1.2.0-1 to 1.2.0-2): BLOCKED: Cannot migrate due to an

Bug#1102694: src:harlequin-odbc: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
ease reach out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=harlequin-odbc Current text from [2]: Migration status for harlequin-odbc (0.3.0-1 to 0.3.1-1): BLOCKED: Cannot migrate due to another item, which

Bug#1102695: src:harlequin-postgres: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
e process, please reach out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=harlequin-postgres Current text from [2]: Migration status for harlequin-postgres (1.2.0-1 to 1.2.0-2): BLOCKED: Cannot migrate due to an

Bug#1102696: src:petsc4py: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=petsc4py Current text from [2]: Migration status for petsc4py (3.22.3-1 to 3.22.4-1): BLOCKED: Cannot migrate due to another item, which is blocked (please c

Bug#1102693: src:frr: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
nually. If you have any comments with regards to the content or the process, please reach out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=frr Current text from [2]: Migration status for frr (10.2.1-6 to 10.3-1

Bug#1102693: src:frr: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
nually. If you have any comments with regards to the content or the process, please reach out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=frr Current text from [2]: Migration status for frr (10.2.1-6 to 10.3-1

Bug#1102693: src:frr: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
nually. If you have any comments with regards to the content or the process, please reach out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=frr Current text from [2]: Migration status for frr (10.2.1-6 to 10.3-1

Re: testing migration for Essential packages

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
ntial packages, to add a hint-testsuite-triggers [1] test. That way we would at least know which packages to test for. Paul [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst?ref_type=heads OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Saturday, Apr 12 2025 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Loongana 001 Contributed by: Anne Black http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/12/2025 __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/

Documentation for the REDUCE intrinsic

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Hi All, Now that the reduce intrinsic seems to be OK on all platforms, I thought that it was time to catch up with the documentation. The attached produces good .html without any additional warnings or errors using texi2any and ~/share/info/gfortran.info is as intended. OK for mainline? Paul

Documentation for the REDUCE intrinsic

2025-04-12 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Hi All, Now that the reduce intrinsic seems to be OK on all platforms, I thought that it was time to catch up with the documentation. The attached produces good .html without any additional warnings or errors using texi2any and ~/share/info/gfortran.info is as intended. OK for mainline? Paul

Bug#1102465: petsc: PETSc was configured with one MPICH/Open MPI mpi.h version but now appears to be compiling using an older version

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Gevers
grating together if not expressed in relations. And then even upstream may have overseen a problem that we only catch while testing in Debian. Again, a versioned dependency can express what we find during unstable-to-testing integration. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1102465: petsc: PETSc was configured with one MPICH/Open MPI mpi.h version but now appears to be compiling using an older version

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Gevers
grating together if not expressed in relations. And then even upstream may have overseen a problem that we only catch while testing in Debian. Again, a versioned dependency can express what we find during unstable-to-testing integration. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions (PR #135457)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kirth via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457 >From 1e5adae44b8e8ebbb0438d1c5972f3937711954a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Kirth Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:37:40 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions clang-

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Pre-commit tests for static members and functions (PR #135456)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kirth via cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135456 >From 07c9c8756b564198c2761e353b1b2b2031c9a4ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Kirth Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:11:20 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-doc] Pre-commit tests for static members and functi

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions (PR #135457)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kirth via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457 >From 1e5adae44b8e8ebbb0438d1c5972f3937711954a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Kirth Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:37:40 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions clang-

Re: ISPF EDIT CHANGE regex requirements?

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Gilmartin
's the DSFS User's Guide? >On 4/11/2025 5:46 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >> On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 23:32:55 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote: >> >>> How would vim execute in a TN3270 session? >>> >> I've used REXX address SYSCALL under ISPF for other

Re: Compilation issue between Groovy 3.0.21 & 3.0.23

2025-04-11 Thread Paul King
e.g. either changing to an instance field: private final Closure noOpClosure = { T v -> return v } Or use a static factory method (the T method placeholder here is unrelated to the class generics): private static final Closure getNoOpClosure() { { T v -> return v } } Paul.

Re: ISPF EDIT CHANGE regex requirements?

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 23:32:55 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote: >How would vim execute in a TN3270 session? > I've used REXX address SYSCALL under ISPF for other things. >____ >From: Paul Gilmartin >Sent: Friday, April 11, 2025 2:28 PM >On Fri, 11

Bug#1101211: isenkram: add support for generating and installing system-specific task-hardware-support metapackages

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 12:34 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > It turns out that since systemd 248, the hardware info is exposed > by hostnamectl (no root), which also has machine-readable output. One caveat to that is that the system serial number exposed as HardwareSerial in the JSON output, i

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions (PR #135457)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kirth via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi ready_for_review https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions (PR #135457)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kirth via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135457 clang-doc didn't visit VarDecl, and hence never collected info from class statics members and functions. Fixes #59813. >From 4b02fd4b9043237a997f01b3fa814c6f172d98d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pa

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Pre-commit tests for static members and functions (PR #135456)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kirth via cfe-commits
patches will address the missing documentation. >From 07c9c8756b564198c2761e353b1b2b2031c9a4ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Kirth Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:11:20 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Pre-commit tests for static members and functions Issue #59813 mentions that static members are

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Pre-commit tests for static members and functions (PR #135456)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kirth via cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi ready_for_review https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135456 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Handle static members and functions (PR #135457)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kirth via llvm-branch-commits
ilovepi wrote: > [!WARNING] > This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is > open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/135457?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning";

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Pre-commit tests for static members and functions (PR #135456)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kirth via cfe-commits
ilovepi wrote: * **#135457** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/135457?utm_source=stack-comment-icon"; target="_blank">https://static.graphite.dev/graphite-32x32-black.png"; alt="Graphite" width="10px" height="10px"/> * **#135456** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-

Re: Lists in annotations

2025-04-11 Thread Paul King
> lambdas), but I would rather not have arguments collected if the signature > isn't varargs. > > Christopher Smith > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025, 05:22 Paul King wrote: >> >> I think it is just the case that Java supports only a single value or >> array no

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] security: Hornet LSM

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Moore
prog_len = buf_sz; > + > + if (prog_len > markerlen && > + memcmp(buf + prog_len - markerlen, EBPF_SIG_STRING, markerlen) == 0) > + prog_len -= markerlen; > + > + memcpy(&sig, buf + (prog_len - sizeof(sig)), sizeof(sig)); > + sig_len = be32_to_cpu(sig.sig_len); > + prog_len -= sig_len + sizeof(sig); > + > + err = mod_check_sig(&sig, prog->len * sizeof(struct bpf_insn), "ebpf"); > + if (err) > + return err; > + return hornet_verify_lskel(prog, maps, buf + prog_len, sig_len); > +} -- paul-moore.com

Re: Credentials not fully initialized before bprm_check LSM hook

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Moore
curity/ would be interested in doing a revert to better support the AT_EXECVE_CHECK for a LSM. Yes, I might be wrong, but for a moment let's assume a revert is not an option, what would you propose to solve this? If you can't think of a general solution, can you think of an IMA specific solution? -- paul-moore.com

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [KeyInstr][JumpThreading] Remap atoms in blocks duplicated for threading (PR #133486)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul T Robinson via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/pogo59 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133486 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Re: [RFC PATCH 22/29] safesetid: move initcalls to the LSM framework

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Moore
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 3:20 PM Micah Morton wrote: > > Acked-by: Micah Morton Thanks Micah! -- paul-moore.com

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [KeyInstr][JumpThreading] Remap atoms in blocks duplicated for threading (PR #133486)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul T Robinson via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +; RUN: opt -S -passes=jump-threading,verify %s | FileCheck %s + +;; Modified from llvm/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-two-bbs.ll +;; +;; JumpThreading duplicates bb.cond2 to thread through bb.file to bb.f2 or exit. +;; +;; Check the duplicated instructions

Re: [RFC PATCH 20/29] smack: move initcalls to the LSM framework

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Moore
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 1:30 PM Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 4/9/2025 11:50 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > > As the LSM framework only supports one LSM initcall callback for each > > initcall type, the init_smk_fs() and smack_nf_ip_init() functions were > > wrapped with a new fun

Re: ISPF EDIT CHANGE regex requirements?

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 19:29:08 +, Farley, Peterrote: >One could enter an IBM “Idea” for that I suppose, but I do not think that the >underlying C library regex routines support those features, so it might be a >heavy ask. > Might sed- like numbered captures be a lighter ask? Or, empower ISPF

[clang] [clang][test][NFC] Use -fdriver-only over /dev/null (PR #135255)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kirth via cfe-commits
ilovepi wrote: > This one shouldn't work. We explicitly don't diagnose this in non-codegen > invocations. That's surprising, but if that's the case, I don't think this patch makes much sense. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135255 ___ cfe

[clang] [clang][test][NFC] Use -fdriver-only over /dev/null (PR #135255)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kirth via cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135255 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang][test][NFC] Use -fdriver-only over /dev/null (PR #135255)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kirth via cfe-commits
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -// RUN: %clang -fopenacc -S %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=ERROR -// RUN: %clang -fclangir -fopenacc -S %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --allow-empty -check-prefix=NOERROR -// RUN: %clang -fopenacc -fclangir -S %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileC

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-calext-subscription-upgrade-13

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kyzivat
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-calext-subscription-upgrade-13 Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat Review Date: 2025-04-11 IETF LC End Date: 2025-04-14 IESG Telechat date: ? Summary: This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described in the review. ISSUES: 8 NITS

[valgrind] [Bug 390310] Output summaries in XML files

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390310 --- Comment #17 from Paul Floyd --- And FreeBSD > memcheck/tests/long_namespace_xml(stderr) > memcheck/tests/threadname_xml(stderr) > memcheck/tests/xml1 (stderr) > drd/tests/annotate

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Fix SBTarget::ReadInstruction with flavor (PR #134626)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kirth via lldb-commits
ilovepi wrote: @da-viper Ah, shoot. Sorry for the noise, I think it may have been https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2fd860c1f559c0b0be66cc000e38270a04d0a1a3, which was just reverted. thanks for taking a look. :) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134626 ___

Re: [v3,1/2] rcutorture: Perform more frequent testing of ->gpwrap

2025-04-11 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 05:36:32AM -, Joel Fernandes wrote: > Hello, Paul, > > On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 05:33:16 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:54:13AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:29:03AM -0700,

[valgrind] [Bug 390310] Output summaries in XML files

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390310 --- Comment #16 from Paul Floyd --- As a note to myself, on Illumos I currently get the following extra fails: > memcheck/tests/gone_abrt_xml (stderr) > memcheck/tests/mismatches_xml(stderr) > memcheck/t

Re: Store-Clock-Fast Facility

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 4/11/25 12:20, Dan Greiner wrote: As to Charles' statement that "STCKF is potentially so much faster ...", well, that depends. STCK and STCKE are required to produce monitonically-advancing results. That is, they will never produce the same results in an MP environment, and the results wil

Bug#1087696: fonts-spleen: "Spleen" not available to console-setup

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Saunders
On 10/04/2025 19:02, Alex Myczko wrote: Hi Paul Well mostly the fonts- packages install vector fonts of formats ttf or otf. The setfont command and your configure thing uses fonts from the package console-setup-linux, mostly compressed pcf font format (bitmap). Try dpkg -L console-setup

Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] audit: record AUDIT_ANOM_* events regardless of presence of rules

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Moore
enied(int type, const char > *operation) > { > struct audit_buffer *ab; > > - if (!audit_enabled || audit_dummy_context()) > + if (!audit_enabled) > return; > > /* Generate log with subject, operation, outcome. */ > -- >

Re: Store-Clock-Fast Facility

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 4/11/25 11:38, Mario Bezzi wrote. @Charles: You make a good point about STCKE, but I was under the impression, confirmed by a quick check that as STCK, it also requires synchronization. ... Yes, but because of the finer granularity of the ETOE, the serialization is likely to take less

Re: [PATCH v2] audit,module: restore audit logging in load failure case

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Moore
t. >*/ > - if (!module_allocated) > + if (!module_allocated) { > + audit_log_kern_module(info->name ? info->name : > "(unavailable)"); In keeping with audit tradition, wouldn't we want this to be "?" instead of "(unavailable)"? > mod_stat_bump_becoming(info, flags); > + } > free_copy(info, flags); > return err; > } > -- > 2.43.5 -- paul-moore.com

Re: [PATCH v2] audit,module: restore audit logging in load failure case

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Moore
t. >*/ > - if (!module_allocated) > + if (!module_allocated) { > + audit_log_kern_module(info->name ? info->name : > "(unavailable)"); In keeping with audit tradition, wouldn't we want th

Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] audit: record AUDIT_ANOM_* events regardless of presence of rules

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Moore
enied(int type, const char > *operation) > { > struct audit_buffer *ab; > > - if (!audit_enabled || audit_dummy_context()) > + if (!audit_enabled) > return; > > /* Generate log with subject, operation, outcome. */ > -- > 2.43.5 -- paul-moore.com

Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] audit: record fanotify event regardless of presence of rules

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Moore
nse_info_audit_rule > *friar) > +void audit_fanotify(u32 response, struct fanotify_response_info_audit_rule > *friar) > { > /* {subj,obj}_trust values are {0,1,2}: no,yes,unknown */ > switch (friar->hdr.type) { > -- > 2.43.5 -- paul-moore.com ___ Linux-audit mailing list -- linux-audit@lists.linux-audit.osci.io To unsubscribe send an email to linux-audit-le...@lists.linux-audit.osci.io

Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] audit: record fanotify event regardless of presence of rules

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Moore
nse_info_audit_rule > *friar) > +void audit_fanotify(u32 response, struct fanotify_response_info_audit_rule > *friar) > { > /* {subj,obj}_trust values are {0,1,2}: no,yes,unknown */ > switch (friar->hdr.type) { > -- > 2.43.5 -- paul-moore.com

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] audit: Mark audit_log_vformat() with __printf() attribute

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Moore
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 6:02 PM Paul Moore wrote: > On Mar 13, 2025 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > audit_log_vformat() is using printf() type of format, and GCC compiler > > (Debian 14.2.0-17) is not happy about this: > > > > kernel/audit.c:1978:9: error: functi

[PATCH] selftests: Removing deprecated strncpy()

2025-04-11 Thread Kevin Paul Reddy Janagari
erred replacement because it overcomes the limitations of strncpy mentioned above. Compile Tested Signed-off-by: Kevin Paul Reddy Janagari --- tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync.c b/tools/te

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Fix SBTarget::ReadInstruction with flavor (PR #134626)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Kirth via lldb-commits
ilovepi wrote: I think we're seeing this persist on x86_64 mac bots https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/fuchsia/builders/toolchain.ci/lldb-mac-x64/b8717871333718166241/infra I'm not sure what the right spelling is to opt out.. I think @DavidSpickett's original suggestion may work better if we need to

[mou-net] Anyone missing a homing pigeon?

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Schlick
roof. We're on the east side of Fish Lake near Chesshire Lane N and 79th Ave. Let me know if it's yours and you want to try and retrieve it. Paul Schlick General information and guidelines for posting: https://moumn.org/listservice.html Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

Bug#1102664: src:petsc: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Gevers
reach out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=petsc Current text from [2]: Migration status for petsc (3.22.3+dfsg1-1 to 3.22.5+dfsg1-1): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a

Bug#1102664: src:petsc: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Gevers
reach out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=petsc Current text from [2]: Migration status for petsc (3.22.3+dfsg1-1 to 3.22.5+dfsg1-1): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a

Bug#1102664: src:petsc: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Gevers
reach out to me. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=petsc Current text from [2]: Migration status for petsc (3.22.3+dfsg1-1 to 3.22.5+dfsg1-1): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a

[VOTE] Release Felix HTTP Jetty12 1.0.28, HTTP base 5.1.12

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Rütter
Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for 72 hours. -- Paul Rütter | Tech Lead | BlueConic | Wijchenseweg 101, 6538 SW | Nijmegen, The Netherlands | www.blueconic.com

Re: [Rd] Check for protection (was: table() and as.character() performance for logical values)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul McQuesten
For a long-term horizon, would it help R developers to use a naming convention? Perhaps, varName_PROT, or the inverse varName_UNPROT? Eventually, teach some linter about that? On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:40 AM Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On a tangent from the main topic of this thread: sometimes (es

Bug#1102414: moreinfo needed

2025-04-11 Thread Paul R. Tagliamonte
tags 1102414 moreinfo thanks removing this package breaks b-d -- mind taking a look into this breakage and removing the tag when it's addressed? Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Build-Depends: rails: ruby-chromedriver-helper thanks!

Bug#1102277: moreinfo needed

2025-04-11 Thread Paul R. Tagliamonte
tags 1102277 moreinfo thanks # Broken Depends: endless-sky-high-dpi: endless-sky-high-dpi mind taking a look into this and removing the moreinfo tag when it's addressed? paultag -- :wq

Bug#1101962: moreinfo

2025-04-11 Thread Paul R. Tagliamonte
tags 1101962 moreinfo thanks Thanks for filing this/doing QA work This looks to break two related packages: Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: php-mdb2-driver-mysql: php-mdb2-driver-mysql php-mdb2-driver-pgsql: php-mdb2-driver-pgsql They may also need a ROM bug if there's no r-d

Bug#1090743: moreinfo needed

2025-04-11 Thread Paul R. Tagliamonte
tags 1090743 moreinfo thanks as noted in the report: # Broken Build-Depends: fonts-dejavu: woff-tools fonts-fantasque-sans: woff-tools that are pending some work - please remove the tag when this is ready and we can process right away. paultag -- :wq

Re: Lists in annotations

2025-04-11 Thread Paul King
sting to see whether it is a simple or ugly change at the grammar/early parsing level. Cheers, Paul. On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 7:19 PM Gianluca Sartori wrote: > > Hi folks, > > we use the following well known annotation in our Grails controllers: > > @Secured(['ROLE_USE

Re: Updated Debian Ports installation images 2025-03-31

2025-04-11 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi, On Fri, 2025-04-11 at 10:33 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > About these failures, that is due to unresolved dependencies, for > > example with caja: > > > > # sudo apt install caja > > Solving dependencies... Error! > > Some packages could

Re: Updated Debian Ports installation images 2025-03-31

2025-04-11 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Mathias, On Mon, 2025-04-07 at 16:09 +0200, Mathias Parnaudeau wrote: > On 31/03/2025 14:48, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have just created updated installation images for Debian Ports. > > Thank you very much for these new images, I didn

bug#77640: [platform-testers] new snapshot available: gzip-1.13.56-e549

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Eggert
On 2025-04-10 15:13, Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: I made this change against the original test file: % diff dfly-openat-bug.c dfly-openat-bug-3.c 8c8 < int dirfd = open ("d/", O_SEARCH | O_DIRECTORY); --- > int dirfd = open ("d/", O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY)

[sr-dev] Re: [kamailio/kamailio] docs discrepancies for cd module (in 6.0.x) (Issue #4201)

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Donald via sr-dev
systemcrash left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4201) Sorry for off topic here: but [6.0.x modules](https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/6.0.x) lists [APP_LUA_SR](https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/6.0.x/modules/app_lua_sr.html), which was removed(?) -- Reply to this email directly or view

[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Friday, Apr 11 2025 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Camel Donga Contributed by: Matthias Baermann http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/11/2025 __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mail

Re: symbolic link curiousity in 3.6.0

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Eggert
On 2025-04-10 15:47, Bruno Haible wrote: But what I could do is to change Gnulib's file-has-acl module so that if the environment variable CYGWINLY_PEDANTIC is set, Oh, let's not do that. We have too many environment variables already. Thanks for explaining.

bug#77724: [PATCH] maint: include errno.h

2025-04-11 Thread Paul Eggert
On 2025-04-10 22:27, Andreas Stieger via GNU gzip discussion and bug reports. wrote: Found building for s390x on openSUSE --- dfltcc.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/dfltcc.c b/dfltcc.c index 9f86581..7333757 100644 --- a/dfltcc.c +++ b/dfltcc.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include #in

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >