On 4/10/23 07:40, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
AGAINST - I agree with most of this, but halving stamps every month is
too frequent, and likely going to lead to very uninteresting gameplay
(I suspect there isn't enough time to accumulate enough stamps to make
trades worthwhile) - the 1/week re
On Mon, 2023-04-10 at 09:11 -0500, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 4/10/23 07:40, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> > AGAINST - I agree with most of this, but halving stamps every month is
> > too frequent, and likely going to lead to very uninteresting gameplay
> > (I suspect there isn't eno
> Motion to extend filed: 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00
> Judged FALSE by Janet:01 Jan 1970 00:00:00
heh forgot to fill these in, defaulted to 0. Fixed in the archive as:
> History:
>
> Called by Juan: 27 Mar 2023 18:2
Hm, I thought I already asked this, but I'd like to become "interested" as
a judge.
(must be my bad, since now I can't find it!)
--
4st
Deputy(AKA FAKE) webmastor
Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:36 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Hm, I thought I already asked this, but I'd like to become "interested" as
> a judge.
> (must be my bad, since now I can't find it!)
You were added when you asked, just haven't rotated to the top yet,
from the Gazette:
Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion [2023-04-09 07:27]:
> Would Agora be interested in roleplay combat?
I would be very interested in role-playing games within Agora. Indeed,
I've even researched some minimal system that would be suitable. I found
TinyD6. Now, I can't find its rules online, so I
> On Apr 10, 2023, at 1:57 PM, juan via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> secretsnail9 via agora-official [2023-04-09 18:37]:
>> PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW
>>
>> […]
>>
>> ID Author(s) AITitle
>> ---
On 4/10/23 14:06, juan via agora-business wrote:
8950~ nix 2.0 Major Stamp Reform
AGAINST. Don't touch my stamps.
Ugh, I give up. I don't think there's a good consensus on what kind of
play people want right now.
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald, Collector
On 4/10/23 15:06, juan via agora-business wrote:
>> 8949* Janet 3.0 Might as well ask?
> Conditional: FOR if any of the following conditions are met:
>
> - Janet has pledged to vote FOR the first proposal that performs the
> following action, and no others: Turn juan's Emera
nix via agora-discussion [2023-04-10 14:11]:
> On 4/10/23 14:06, juan via agora-business wrote:
> > > 8950~ nix 2.0 Major Stamp Reform
> > AGAINST. Don't touch my stamps.
> >
>
> Ugh, I give up. I don't think there's a good consensus on what kind of play
> people want righ
secretsnail9 via agora-discussion [2023-04-10 14:10]:
> I recommend tagging your proposals with "[Proposal]". I almost missed
> G.'s proposal because it wasn't tagged, and once I got it I thought I had
> them all, but apparently not. It's my bad for missing (@Promotor) though,
> even if [Proposal]
On 4/10/23 15:32, juan via agora-business wrote:
> Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-04-10 15:25]:
>> On 4/10/23 15:06, juan via agora-business wrote:
8949* Janet 3.0 Might as well ask?
>>> Conditional: FOR if any of the following conditions are met:
>>>
>>> - Janet h
Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-04-10 15:36]:
> On 4/10/23 15:32, juan via agora-business wrote:
> > Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-04-10 15:25]:
> >> On 4/10/23 15:06, juan via agora-business wrote:
> 8949* Janet 3.0 Might as well ask?
> >>> Conditional: FOR
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:36 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Wow, ok. Just tried to be cheeky and make a fun little action. Note that
> > I also want forgiveness on a missed deadline. Just seemed fair.
>
>
> Sorry, no rebuke implied. And I admittedly didn't check whether you had
> ea
On 4/10/23 15:42, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Anyhow, I change my vote on 8949 to FOR.
>>>
>>> P.S.: how scammable?
>>>
>> I could make a pledge to do so with a time limit of 1 second.
> I mean…
>
>> Allowing a pledge to expire without carrying out an action one pledged
>> to do in it cons
Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-04-10 15:41]:
> On 4/10/23 15:38, juan via agora-business wrote:
> > I create and submit the following proposal:
> >
> > {
> > Title: Standardizing CANs
> > Author: juan
> > A.I.: 3.0
> >
> > Ammend Rule 478 by replacing its first instance of “may
On 4/10/23 15:51, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-04-10 15:41]:
>> On 4/10/23 15:38, juan via agora-business wrote:
>>> I create and submit the following proposal:
>>>
>>> {
>>> Title: Standardizing CANs
>>> Author: juan
>>> A.I.: 3.0
>>>
>>> A
On 4/10/23 14:57, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
(Also, it might be better to include context rather than just "first
instance of 'may'".)
Why?
Eliminates any chance of accidentally changing the wrong thing due to a
concurrent proposal, and is clearer for the reader on what's being cha
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 3:31 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> This has been fluctuating from serious to non-serious, which is where a
> rule should be seems there's a little more support now than before, and
> I've made some changes.
> Overall, I'm
19 matches
Mail list logo
