Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-04-10 15:41]:
> On 4/10/23 15:38, juan via agora-business wrote:
> > I create and submit the following proposal:
> >
> > {
> > Title: Standardizing CANs
> > Author: juan
> > A.I.: 3.0
> >
> > Ammend Rule 478 by replacing its first instance of “may”
> > with “CAN”.
> >
> > Ammend Rule 1789 by replacing its first instance of “may”
> > with “CAN”.
> >
> > }
> >
> >
>
> I (unconfidently) don't think the second change is necessary? A person
> has a natural ability to submit documents, and that doesn't need to be
> enabled with a CAN.
1. It might not be necessary, but its about standartization. Also:
2. Does that ability really exist? To “submit” is not to publish. Is
to do so under a specific intent to perform some task during some
procedure defined by rules. That's my reading, anyway. It sure works,
but isn't it clearer to make that action part of the rule's conceptual
world? Or else we should say “publish” instead of “submit”.
> (Also, it might be better to include context rather than just "first
> instance of 'may'".)
Why?
--
juan
