Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-04-18 17:08]:
> On 4/18/23 17:00, juan via agora-official wrote:
> > juan [2023-04-14 16:37]:
> >> I intend, without objection, to flip the Publicity of Tue to Foreign.
> > I do so.
> >
>
> Was this the intent sent to tue? I didn't receive it if so.
🤦
--
ju
On 4/18/23 17:00, juan via agora-official wrote:
> juan [2023-04-14 16:37]:
>> I intend, without objection, to flip the Publicity of Tue to Foreign.
> I do so.
>
Was this the intent sent to tue? I didn't receive it if so.
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-04-14 15:04]:
> On 4/14/23 14:57, nix via agora-business wrote:
> > I intend, with 3 Agoran Consent, to enact the following emergency
> > regulation:
> >
> > {The PM CAN flip the publicity of Tue to Foreign, by announcement.}
> >
> > It's time to let tue sleep
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:33 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> But you're not PM...
For now.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 6:12 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 21:01, Aris Merchant via agora-business
> wrote:
> >
> > I submit the following proposals.
> >
> > -Aris
> > ---
> > Title: Fix Emergencies
> > Adoption index: 3.0
>
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Pavitra wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> And it's also true under the related legal maxim (not mathematical logic)
>> of exceptio probat regulam (de rebus non exceptis). Overuse of
>> mathematical symbolic constructs in the courts and in law makes us forget
>> that legal logic
comex wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>> It occurs to me that R754(3) fails to establish a precedence relation
>> between legal and mathematical definitions.
>
> I've never seen "if A, then B" used as iff as an _expression_-- to
> answer "is it true that if A, then B?".
I
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> It occurs to me that R754(3) fails to establish a precedence relation
> between legal and mathematical definitions.
I've never seen "if A, then B" used as iff as an _expression_-- to
answer "is it true that if A, then B?".
--
-c.
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>>> 2009/8/28 Roger Hicks :
(If X then Y) implies (if X then Y else (not Y))
>>>
>>> Jesus
>>> flippin'
>>> Christ
>>> on
>>> a
>>> pogo
>>> stick
>>> Please tell me this was a typo.
>>
>>
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> 2009/8/28 Roger Hicks :
>>> (If X then Y) implies (if X then Y else (not Y))
>>
>> Jesus
>> flippin'
>> Christ
>> on
>> a
>> pogo
>> stick
>> Please tell me this was a typo.
>
> It's true for CANs on regulated th
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2009/8/28 Roger Hicks :
>> (If X then Y) implies (if X then Y else (not Y))
>
> Jesus
> flippin'
> Christ
> on
> a
> pogo
> stick
> Please tell me this was a typo.
It's true for CANs on regulated things because the default state is not Y.
Roger Hicks wrote:
> I don't see the equivalence. (If X then Y) implies (if X then Y else
> (not Y)) which is why it seems broken to me.
I believe you're confusing "if" with "iff".
Do we need to add IF,IMPLIES,SUFFICIENT and IFF,IF AND ONLY IF,NECESSARY
AND SUFFICIENT to MMI?
signature.asc
Des
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 16:52 +0100, ais523 wrote:
> "If X then Y" implies nothing about the truth value of Y if X turns out
> to be true.
That should read:
> "If X then Y" implies nothing about the truth value of Y if X turns
> out to be false.
Obviously, I suck at correcting things.
--
ais523
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 16:52 +0100, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 09:45 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> > I don't see the equivalence. (If X then Y) implies (if X then Y else
> > (not Y)) which is why it seems broken to me.
> Err, no it doesn't.
>
> "If X then Y" implies nothing about the truth
2009/8/28 Roger Hicks :
> (If X then Y) implies (if X then Y else (not Y))
Jesus
flippin'
Christ
on
a
pogo
stick
Please tell me this was a typo.
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 09:45 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> I don't see the equivalence. (If X then Y) implies (if X then Y else
> (not Y)) which is why it seems broken to me.
Err, no it doesn't.
"If X then Y" implies nothing about the truth value of Y if X turns out
to be true.
--
ais523
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 09:22, comex wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 28, 2009, at 8:08 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>>
>> Well, to be honest the whole thing doesn't make sense. comex's
>> arguments only further convinced me that the rule has been broken all
>> along. I retract the above pro
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 28, 2009, at 8:08 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
Well, to be honest the whole thing doesn't make sense. comex's
arguments only further convinced me that the rule has been broken all
along. I retract the above proposal (which wasn't distributable anyway
because I forgot II
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 23:50 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 6:34 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I still have a strong feeling that Agora needs some sort of safety valve
> >> to escape from situat
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 20:10 -0400, ihope wrote:
> The proposal system's 12 (actually higher than 12, of course) gets
> bigger whenever 26 gets bigger. A with-support rule's 12 does not.
I challenge that "actually higher"; barring vetos, I believe that a team
of 11 Scamsters working together could c
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 6:34 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I still have a strong feeling that Agora needs some sort of safety valve
>> to escape from situations where the normal proposal system doesn't work,
>>
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 6:34 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I still have a strong feeling that Agora needs some sort of safety valve
>> to escape from situations where the normal proposal system doesn't work,
>>
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 6:34 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still have a strong feeling that Agora needs some sort of safety valve
> to escape from situations where the normal proposal system doesn't work,
> maybe after seeing it happen to B Nomic at least twice in the last year.
B does
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> Nobody has 12 friends. Unless, I guess, they're non-Agoran friends who
>> all register at once. Maybe we could limit registrations to
>> one-per-week-or-without-three-objections.
>
> That was the sort of situation I met, and I don't think this would be
> wo
> >> No, it has the problem that anybody with 12 friends can do
> >> anything they want.
> >
> > Isn't this true of the proposal system in general, for
> > sufficiently large values of 12?
>
> The proposal system's 12 (actually higher than 12, of course) gets
> bigger whenever 26 gets bigger. A wit
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 20 September 2008 05:53:58 pm Ian Kelly wrote:
>> No, it has the problem that anybody with 12 friends can do anything
>> they want.
>
> Isn't this true of the proposal system in general, for sufficiently
> large va
On Saturday 20 September 2008 05:53:58 pm Ian Kelly wrote:
> No, it has the problem that anybody with 12 friends can do anything
> they want.
Isn't this true of the proposal system in general, for sufficiently
large values of 12?
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 5:03 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 4:34 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I still have a strong feeling that Agora needs some sort of safety valve
>>> to escape
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 4:34 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I still have a strong feeling that Agora needs some sort of safety valve
>> to escape from situations where the normal proposal system doesn't work,
>> maybe
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 4:34 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still have a strong feeling that Agora needs some sort of safety valve
> to escape from situations where the normal proposal system doesn't work,
> maybe after seeing it happen to B Nomic at least twice in the last year.
> I tho
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 16:31 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 3:58 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I submit the following proposal (AI=3, II=1):
> >
> > Add a rule with the following text, and set its power to 3:
> > {{{
> > Any player can make arbitrary changes to th
On Sun, 11 May 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2008/5/9 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Does IRCNomic actually have enough players to successfully invade Agora?
>>
>> -root
>>
>
> s/IRCNomic/Canada/
>
> And no. No it does not.
Canada doesn't have enough players to invade Agora? I always said they
2008/5/9 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Does IRCNomic actually have enough players to successfully invade Agora?
>
> -root
>
s/IRCNomic/Canada/
And no. No it does not.
ehird
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a former IRCNomician, I SUPPORT. Let the fun begin.
NttPF.
On 19:19 Sat 10 May , Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2008/5/10 Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > As a former IRCNomician, I SUPPORT. Let the fun begin.
>
> 'Former' is questionable, as you are in #ircnomic and have not opted out.
>
> ehird
I don't pay attention much. I've opted out alreay.
2008/5/10 Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As a former IRCNomician, I SUPPORT. Let the fun begin.
'Former' is questionable, as you are in #ircnomic and have not opted out.
ehird
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> On 5/9/08, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > Hora iam est pro Viri Clarissimi venire succuro pro patria.
>>>
>>> Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of th
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gives "Hour now is for Green Clarissimi to come to run up under
> for fatherland."
I'll draw up the proposal to rename Ribbons to Clarissimi right away.
Well, in my opinion, that translation certainly isn't a valid reason to call
for an emergency session.
--
ais523
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ed Murphy
Sent: Fri 09/05/2008 20:06
To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Emer
Eris wrote:
> On 5/9/08, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hora iam est pro Viri Clarissimi venire succuro pro patria.
>>
>> Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country?
>
> I thought i
On 5/9/08, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hora iam est pro Viri Clarissimi venire succuro pro patria.
>
> Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country?
I thought it said "Now is the time
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hora iam est pro Viri Clarissimi venire succuro pro patria.
>
Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country?
2008/5/9 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm not surprised. comex also proposed the B Nomic proposal to
> declare war on Agora.
>
> -root
>
Of course, rubbish has many uses as well - especially if it can be recycled.
ehird
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4. comex is the one who proposed the 'war' proposal and it was quickly
> shot down and ignored.
A minor technicality.
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4. comex is the one who proposed the 'war' proposal and it was quickly
> shot down and ignored.
I'm not surprised. comex also proposed the B Nomic proposal to
declare war on Agora.
-root
45 matches
Mail list logo
