I have some thoughts for revamping it and I could throw something together,
if others share there ideas on what would make it helpful.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 25 May 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-05-25 at
My bad. Just forgot
Gaelan
> On May 25, 2017, at 10:32 AM, Josh T wrote:
>
> @Gaelan: I have expressed a desire to not be referred to by my real name.
> While there is nothing in the rules that prevents you from doing so, I shall
> glare at you menacingly for ignore my wishes.
>
> I have go
On Thu, 25 May 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 14:53 +, Quazie wrote:
> > I still think some thing along the lines of: "A judge may recuse emself
> > from a case, at which point they become unassigned from said case. When a
> > judge recuses emself, or is late to judge a CFJ a
@Gaelan: I have expressed a desire to not be referred to by my real name.
While there is nothing in the rules that prevents you from doing so, I
shall glare at you menacingly for ignore my wishes.
I have gotten the mailing list to accept 天火狐 as my name as of this message,
and if everything goes we
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:54 AM, CuddleBeam
wrote:
> @ais523: Super. Thank you! I'll try to make a sufficiently eloquent but also
> concise and easy-to-use definition of what kind of cases I find myself more
> suitable for, but it's definitely the more philosophical kind, because I will
> go
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 16:58 +, Quazie wrote:
> Well bad judgments can be overturned - so the cookie recepies likely
> wouldn't stand
>
> Unless:
>
> I CFJ on the following statement:
>
> 'The judge assigned to this CFJ will be kind enough to include eir
> favorite cookie recipe in eir ju
@ais523: Super. Thank you! I'll try to make a sufficiently eloquent
but also concise and easy-to-use definition of what kind of cases I
find myself more suitable for, but it's definitely the more
philosophical kind, because I will go above and beyond to give it a
better answer than just "it's irrel
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 14:53 +, Quazie wrote:
> I still think some thing along the lines of: "A judge may recuse emself
> from a case, at which point they become unassigned from said case. When a
> judge recuses emself, or is late to judge a CFJ and eir cade had been
> reassigned, they become in
I still think some thing along the lines of: "A judge may recuse emself
from a case, at which point they become unassigned from said case. When a
judge recuses emself, or is late to judge a CFJ and eir cade had been
reassigned, they become ineligible to be assigned as a judge for a week"
On Thu, Ma
Idea: "offer" CFJs instead of assigning them. Have an Agency that lets us
accept an offered CFJ, at which point it actually assigns.
> On May 25, 2017, at 7:41 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 14:20 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote:
>> As for removing myself, I believe I am extremely ap
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 14:45 +, Quazie wrote:
> Is it reasonable to request to you not be eligible for certain
> judicial subsets?
>
> Could I ask to be ineligible for CFJs about Card based actions for
> example?
> - not that I want this, just asking about the concept.
I think that's a reasona
Is it reasonable to request to you not be eligible for certain judicial
subsets?
Could I ask to be ineligible for CFJs about Card based actions for example?
- not that I want this, just asking about the concept.
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 07:42 Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 14:20 +0200,
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 14:20 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote:
> As for removing myself, I believe I am extremely appropriate for certain
> flavors of CFJ. I wish there was a way I could be assigned mostly those
> specifically.
If there's a particular sort of CFJ you'd like to focus on, you can let
me know,
13 matches
Mail list logo
