@ais523: Super. Thank you! I'll try to make a sufficiently eloquent but also concise and easy-to-use definition of what kind of cases I find myself more suitable for, but it's definitely the more philosophical kind, because I will go above and beyond to give it a better answer than just "it's irrelevant to gameplay".
(Like goddamn, ambiguity and concerns of language and meaning are PRECISELY a big reason why we have CFJs in the first place to get clarity, I believe. Why wouldn't "ambiguity" itself be extremely relevant! It's a cornerstone in this nomic! It's the soil we're all standing on! Aaaah!) @Nic Evans: Yes. I'm still a rookie, so all I ask for is patience as I attempt to make a better result. I find the use of the term "Agoran" a bit curious though. Even if I do make CFJs in a way that is perceived to be incorrect, I am (part of) Agora now too. So that would, while perceived to be deviant, now contribute to what makes things actually "Agoran". In fact, someone absolutely psychotic but with good faith could join and honestly submit/judge CFJs as cookie recipes, and now part of Agora is entirely seriously considering CFJs to be cookie recipes (as seriously as you may consider that CFJs should be done in the usual way that real life law does it). And in a dystropian case, plenty of that kind of mentally ill people could join, and then, what would be Agoran, would be to have CFJ be cookie recipes. However I do agree with that the standard you mention is a Good Idea.
