I still think some thing along the lines of: "A judge may recuse emself from a case, at which point they become unassigned from said case. When a judge recuses emself, or is late to judge a CFJ and eir cade had been reassigned, they become ineligible to be assigned as a judge for a week" On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 07:49 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
> Idea: "offer" CFJs instead of assigning them. Have an Agency that lets us > accept an offered CFJ, at which point it actually assigns. > > > On May 25, 2017, at 7:41 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> > wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 14:20 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: > >> As for removing myself, I believe I am extremely appropriate for certain > >> flavors of CFJ. I wish there was a way I could be assigned mostly those > >> specifically. > > If there's a particular sort of CFJ you'd like to focus on, you can let > > me know, and I can try to bias the CFJ selection towards that. (The > > rules currently require me to balance CFJ judge selection over time, > > but with few judges having specific preferences, it's normally possible > > to give each judge the sort of CFJs they want via changing which CFJs > > are given to the judges who have no preference.) > > > > It'd help if you could give a reasonably clear and precise definition > > of the CFJs you want, though, so that I can know whether to assign CFJs > > to you. > > > > -- > > ais523 > > Arbitor >
