On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 10:42 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:23 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The II of a proposal should serve as a flag to get people to look at it;
> > I can certainly imagine that some players won't have time to look at all
> > the proposals,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:23 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The II of a proposal should serve as a flag to get people to look at it;
> I can certainly imagine that some players won't have time to look at all
> the proposals, in which case they should look at those with the highest
> II.
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 22:00 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Why should II matter at all?
> >
> > It's an objective acknowledgment of the significance of the proposed
> > changes. IIRC, a proposal to return to a straight Disi
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why should II matter at all?
>
> It's an objective acknowledgment of the significance of the proposed
> changes. IIRC, a proposal to return to a straight Disinterested /
> Interested system (basically reducing scope from 0-to
Wooble wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:00 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 15:57 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> Proposal: Chambers II
>>> AI: 3
>>> II: 1
>> Please propose this with an II of at least 2, or you'll get an automatic
>> AGAINST from me. Changing the pro
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:00 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 15:57 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Proposal: Chambers II
>> AI: 3
>> II: 1
> Please propose this with an II of at least 2, or you'll get an automatic
> AGAINST from me. Changing the proposal system so radical
BobTHJ wrote:
> Prepend to R2156:
> {{
> There is an Ordinary chamber.
> }}
This would allow ordinary proposals to affect Power=2 rules, provided
that they get at least 2-to-1 support weighted by ordinary voting
power. Given that this weighting has undemocratic by a roughly 4-to-1
ratio lately,
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 15:57 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Proposal: Chambers II
> AI: 3
> II: 1
Please propose this with an II of at least 2, or you'll get an automatic
AGAINST from me. Changing the proposal system so radically (or at least,
moving a lot of things around that will need to be checked
Proposal: Chambers II
AI: 3
II: 1
{
Remove all but the last paragraph from R2196
Create a new rule titled "Chambers" with Power=3 and the following text:
{{
A chamber exists only if defined by a rule that specifies, for
decisions to adopt proposals circulated within that chamber:
1) The set of el
9 matches
Mail list logo
