On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 22:00 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Why should II matter at all? > > > > It's an objective acknowledgment of the significance of the proposed > > changes. IIRC, a proposal to return to a straight Disinterested / > > Interested system (basically reducing scope from 0-to-3 to 0-to-1) > > was recently voted down, so people generally still want this (even > > if no currency earnings currently treat 1-to-3 differently). > > Let me rephrase that. Why should II matter at all to anyone's vote, > provided we're not talking about a trivial proposal that's not > disinterested?
The II of a proposal should serve as a flag to get people to look at it; I can certainly imagine that some players won't have time to look at all the proposals, in which case they should look at those with the highest II. -- ais523
