On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 10:42 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:23 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The II of a proposal should serve as a flag to get people to look at it; > > I can certainly imagine that some players won't have time to look at all > > the proposals, in which case they should look at those with the highest > > II. > > I guess, although I note that you were the one who proposed getting > rid of the current system, and I'd think that once you have read a > proposal it would make sense to vote on it based on its merits, not > reject it out of hand based on its II.
All this is partly backlash against my proposals being rejected because their II was too high, and backlash against the II system in general. If people aren't going to use it consistently (which they don't), it's worse than useless. That's why I tried to repeal it. -- ais523
